BACKGROUND: Most febrile children contacting a GP cooperative are seen by a GP, although the incidence of serious illness is low. The guidelines for triage might not be suitable in primary care. AIM: To investigate the determinants related to the outcome of triage in febrile children. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Dutch GP cooperative. METHOD: Receptionists filled out a triage questionnaire when parents called regarding their febrile child (aged between 3 months and 6 years) and estimated the level of concern of the parents. The outcome was either telephone advice, a consultation, or a home visit. Children were divided in subgroups based on age <18 months or > or = 18 months, and prognostic models for a consultation were constructed. RESULTS: Of 422 children, 73% were seen by a GP. Children aged <18 months were more likely to be seen when their parents reported less drinking or shortness of breath. In children aged > or = 18 months, a duration of fever of > or = 3 days, drowsiness, or a pale, ashen, or mottled skin were predictors of consultation. Children with alarm symptoms were seen according to the guideline. In both subgroups, children without alarm symptoms were more likely to be seen when their parents were concerned. CONCLUSION: The available guideline was followed to a large extent at a GP cooperative. Because, surprisingly, most children were reported to have alarm symptoms, the validity of the triage questions asking parents about alarm symptoms is questionable.
BACKGROUND: Most febrile children contacting a GP cooperative are seen by a GP, although the incidence of serious illness is low. The guidelines for triage might not be suitable in primary care. AIM: To investigate the determinants related to the outcome of triage in febrile children. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Dutch GP cooperative. METHOD: Receptionists filled out a triage questionnaire when parents called regarding their febrile child (aged between 3 months and 6 years) and estimated the level of concern of the parents. The outcome was either telephone advice, a consultation, or a home visit. Children were divided in subgroups based on age <18 months or > or = 18 months, and prognostic models for a consultation were constructed. RESULTS: Of 422 children, 73% were seen by a GP. Children aged <18 months were more likely to be seen when their parents reported less drinking or shortness of breath. In children aged > or = 18 months, a duration of fever of > or = 3 days, drowsiness, or a pale, ashen, or mottled skin were predictors of consultation. Children with alarm symptoms were seen according to the guideline. In both subgroups, children without alarm symptoms were more likely to be seen when their parents were concerned. CONCLUSION: The available guideline was followed to a large extent at a GP cooperative. Because, surprisingly, most children were reported to have alarm symptoms, the validity of the triage questions asking parents about alarm symptoms is questionable.
Authors: Evelien Kerkhof; Monica Lakhanpaul; Samiran Ray; Jan Y Verbakel; Ann Van den Bruel; Matthew Thompson; Marjolein Y Berger; Henriette A Moll; Rianne Oostenbrink Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Elizabeth Morris; Margaret Glogowska; Fatene Abakar Ismail; George Edwards; Susannah Fleming; Kay Wang; Jan Y Verbakel; Ann Van den Bruel; Gail Hayward Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Jan Y Verbakel; Ann Van den Bruel; Matthew Thompson; Richard Stevens; Bert Aertgeerts; Rianne Oostenbrink; Henriette A Moll; Marjolein Y Berger; Monica Lakhanpaul; David Mant; Frank Buntinx Journal: BMC Med Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 8.775