Literature DB >> 18493759

Correlation of femoral head coverage and Graf alpha angle in infants being screened for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

C Gunay1, H Atalar, H Dogruel, O Y Yavuz, I Uras, U Sayli.   

Abstract

Ultrasonography has become accepted as a useful imaging modality in the early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent to which ultrasonographic measurements of femoral head coverage correspond to the categories of hip maturity defined by Graf's angle alpha. The infants in this study (1,037 infants, 2,034 hips) were examined as part of an ultrasound screening program for detecting DDH. We found that femoral head coverage is positively correlated with alpha angle, and we also found upper and lower threshold values of femoral head coverage (51% and 39%), such that all hips having these values or beyond had mature or pathological development, respectively. For the detection of hips having mature development, this provided a specificity of 100% (by definition) and a sensitivity of 82.6%. For hips having pathological development, specificity was 100% and sensitivity was 79.2%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18493759      PMCID: PMC2903126          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0570-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  14 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  S Wientroub; F Grill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The importance of combined clinical and sonographic examination of instability of the neonatal hip.

Authors:  N Rosenberg; V Bialik; D Norman; S Blazer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Ultrasonography in the management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Authors:  P Nimityongskul; R A Hudgens; L D Anderson; R E Melhem; A E Green; S F Saleeb
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

4.  Classification of hip joint dysplasia by means of sonography.

Authors:  R Graf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1984

5.  Examination of the infant hip with real-time ultrasonography.

Authors:  H T Harcke; N M Clarke; M S Lee; P F Borns; G D MacEwen
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Clinical examination versus ultrasonography in detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  H Dogruel; H Atalar; O Y Yavuz; U Sayli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic Combound treatment.

Authors:  R Graf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1980

8.  Ultrasonography in congenital dislocation of the hip. Simultaneous imaging of both hips from in front.

Authors:  S Suzuki; Y Kasahara; T Futami; S Ushikubo; T Tsuchiya
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-11

9.  The infant hip: real-time US assessment of acetabular development.

Authors:  C Morin; H T Harcke; G D MacEwen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Ultrasound for hip assessment in the newborn.

Authors:  T Terjesen; T Bredland; V Berg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-11
View more
  15 in total

1.  Low incidence of early developmental dysplasia of the hip in universal ultrasonographic screening of newborns: analysis and evaluation of risk factors.

Authors:  Alexander Kolb; Nina Schweiger; Mariella Mailath-Pokorny; Alexandra Kaider; Gerhard Hobusch; Catharina Chiari; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Measurement considerations on examiner-dependent factors in the ultrasound assessment of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Alexander Kolb; Emir Benca; Madeleine Willegger; Stephan E Puchner; Reinhard Windhager; Catharina Chiari
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Hip ultrasound for developmental dysplasia: the 50% rule.

Authors:  H Theodore Harcke; B Pruszczynski
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-02-27

4.  Exploration of femoral head coverage in screening developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Xue-Jiao Li; Hong Gao; Xin Yi; Qiao-Jian Liu
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  New "L value" parameter simplifies and enhances hip ultrasound interpretation in the detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Ivan Rakovac; Anton Tudor; Branko Sestan; Tomislav Prpic; Gordan Gulan; Tomislav Madarevic; Veljko Santic; Lana Ruzic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The pubo-femoral distance decreases with Pavlik harness treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns.

Authors:  Daniel Augusto Maranho; Felipe Nunes Donati; Vitor Faeda Dalto; Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip: what have we learned?

Authors:  Jennifer Bracken; Michael Ditchfield
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-09-02

8.  Hip dysplasia screening - epidemiological data from Valcea County.

Authors:  R C Colta; C Stoicanescu; M Nicolae; S Oros; G Burnei
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

9.  Pavlik Harness Disease Revisited: Does Prolonged Treatment of a Dislocated Hip in a Harness Adversely Affect the α Angle?

Authors:  Alex L Gornitzky; Emily K Schaeffer; Charles T Price; Wudbhav N Sankar
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Interobserver agreement and clinical disparity between the Graf method and femoral head coverage measurement in developmental dysplasia of the hip screening: A prospective observational study of 198 newborns.

Authors:  Wen-Chieh Chang; Kuei-Hsiang Hsu; I-Fang Lo; Kai-Hao Liao; Yu-Ping Su
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.