Alexander Kolb1, Emir Benca2, Madeleine Willegger2, Stephan E Puchner2, Reinhard Windhager2, Catharina Chiari2. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. alexander.kolb@meduniwien.ac.at. 2. Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The standardized sonographic hip screening according to Graf has increased reliability and comparability of measurements in the screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, examiner dependent factors have been discussed to influence sonographic measurements. The objectives of this study were to examine the tolerance of the transducer positioning and to analyse the impact of transducer inclinations on Graf's hip grading system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four hips in consecutive newborns were screened sonographically in combination with an optoelectronic motion capture system to trace transducer positions in space. Subsequently five defined inclinations of the transducer relative to Graf's neutral transducer position were analysed, giving a total of 144 sonographic images. RESULTS: We found a permissible transducer inclination in the axial plane of 8.8° to anterior and 8.1° to posterior. In the frontal plane we found a permissible inclination of 15.4° to caudal and 7.2° to cranial. The impact on the α-angle was significant for posterior-cranial (p < 0.001), cranial (p = 0.009), and caudal (p < 0.001) inclined transducer positions. The effect on the results according to Graf's grading system was significant for the caudal inclination of the transducer position (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings show that the standardized plane defined by Graf's criteria allows notable inclinations of the transducer positions. Transducer inclinations show an impact on measurement results, which are clinically relevant. Those effects cannot be ruled out using Graf's ultrasound criteria alone. The examiner should pay attention to avoid transducer inclinations in the frontal plane and a combination of posterior and cranial inclination.
PURPOSE: The standardized sonographic hip screening according to Graf has increased reliability and comparability of measurements in the screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, examiner dependent factors have been discussed to influence sonographic measurements. The objectives of this study were to examine the tolerance of the transducer positioning and to analyse the impact of transducer inclinations on Graf's hip grading system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four hips in consecutive newborns were screened sonographically in combination with an optoelectronic motion capture system to trace transducer positions in space. Subsequently five defined inclinations of the transducer relative to Graf's neutral transducer position were analysed, giving a total of 144 sonographic images. RESULTS: We found a permissible transducer inclination in the axial plane of 8.8° to anterior and 8.1° to posterior. In the frontal plane we found a permissible inclination of 15.4° to caudal and 7.2° to cranial. The impact on the α-angle was significant for posterior-cranial (p < 0.001), cranial (p = 0.009), and caudal (p < 0.001) inclined transducer positions. The effect on the results according to Graf's grading system was significant for the caudal inclination of the transducer position (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings show that the standardized plane defined by Graf's criteria allows notable inclinations of the transducer positions. Transducer inclinations show an impact on measurement results, which are clinically relevant. Those effects cannot be ruled out using Graf's ultrasound criteria alone. The examiner should pay attention to avoid transducer inclinations in the frontal plane and a combination of posterior and cranial inclination.
Entities:
Keywords:
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH); Hip sonography
Authors: Dorien Geertsema; Joris E Meinardi; Dagmar R J Kempink; Marta Fiocco; Michiel A J van de Sande Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-08-18 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Alexander Kolb; Catharina Chiari; Markus Schreiner; Stephan Heisinger; Madeleine Willegger; Gregor Rettl; Reinhard Windhager Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 4.379