Literature DB >> 18492920

Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer.

Kazuhiro Kitajima1, Koji Murakami, Erena Yamasaki, Ichio Fukasawa, Noriyuki Inaba, Yasushi Kaji, Kazuro Sugimura.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of integrated PET and CT (PET/CT) using (18)F-FDG in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer, using surgical and histopathologic findings as the reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with clinical stages IA to IIIC underwent radical hysterectomy, including pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without paraaortic lymphadenectomy, after FDG PET/CT. Lymphadenectomy involved removing all visible lymph nodes in the surgical fields. PET/CT findings were interpreted by two experienced radiologists in consensus and compared with histopathologic results. The criterion for malignancy on PET/CT images was increased radiotracer uptake by a lymph node independent of node size.
RESULTS: In total, 62 pathologically positive nodes were found in 10 patients and 60 of 62 dissected metastatic nodes were identified on the CT component. The overall node-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases were 53.3% (32/60), 99.6% (1,419/1,424), and 97.8% (1,451/1,484), respectively. The sensitivity for detecting metastatic lesions 4 mm or less in diameter was 16.7% (4/24), that for lesions between 5 and 9 mm was 66.7% (14/21), and that for lesions 10 mm or larger was 93.3% (14/15). The overall patient-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 50% (5/10), 86.7% (26/30), and 77.5% (31/40), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Integrated FDG PET/CT is superior to conventional imaging techniques, but it is only moderately sensitive in predicting lymph node metastasis preoperatively in patients with endometrial cancer. Even PET/CT should not replace lymphadenectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18492920     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  33 in total

1.  Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI.

Authors:  Eugene K Choi; Jeong Kon Kim; Hyuck Jae Choi; Seong Ho Park; Bum-Woo Park; Namkug Kim; Jae Seung Kim; Ki Chun Im; Gyunggoo Cho; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  FDG-PET in gynaecological cancers: recent observations.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Positron Lymphography via Intracervical 18F-FDG Injection for Presurgical Lymphatic Mapping in Cervical and Endometrial Malignancies.

Authors:  Jennifer J Mueller; Lawrence T Dauer; Rajmohan Murali; Alexia Iasonos; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Jan Grimm
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Current therapy of patients with endometrial carcinoma. A critical review.

Authors:  S Marnitz; C Köhler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Retrocrural Lymph Node Metastasis Disclosed by (18)F-FDG PET/CT: A Predictor of Supra-diaphragmatic Spread in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Im; Yong-Il Kim; Jin Chul Paeng; June-Key Chung; Soon-Beom Kang; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-10-28

6.  Preoperative PET/CT standardized FDG uptake values of pelvic lymph nodes as a significant prognostic factor in patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Gi Jeong Cheon; Hee Seung Kim; Jae Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong Sang Song
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koji Murakami; Erena Yamasaki; Yasushi Kaji; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance lymphography in gynaecological malignancies.

Authors:  Noor Jahan; Priya Narayanan; Andrea Rockall
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison with integrated FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koji Murakami; Erena Yamasaki; Yasushi Kaji; Mitsugi Shimoda; Keiichi Kubota; Narufumi Suganuma; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with intra-abdominal malignancies: CT vs PET.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Lee; Mi Jin Yun; Mi-Suk Park; Seung Hwan Cha; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jong Doo Lee; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.