Literature DB >> 18492391

Vascular surgery, ICU and HDU: a 14-year observational study.

Mary Teli1, Gareth Morris-Stiff, John R Rees, Paul V Woodsford, Michael H Lewis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Over the course of the past decade, numerous changes have occurred in the management of patients undergoing vascular surgical operations. The introduction of high dependency units (HDUs) has meant that many patients previously requiring observation in intensive care units (ICUs) are now managed in this new environment. In addition, many vascular patients may now be suitable for management on a vascular ward immediately following their surgery. This study reports the chronological changes in resource utilisation of patients undergoing major vascular surgery in a district general hospital over a 14-year period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Details of all patients admitted to either the ICU or HDU under the care of a single vascular surgeon during the period 1991-2004 were extracted from a prospectively maintained anaesthetic department database. Details of the age and gender of the patients were obtained together with source of admission, place of discharge and need for re-admission. Operative details for each patient were extracted from a prospectively maintained vascular surgery database including type of procedure undertaken and degree of urgency.
RESULTS: During the 14-year period under study, there was a dramatic decrease in the use of ICU facilities for the management of vascular patients from 100% in 1991 to 36% in 2004. There was a corresponding increase in the use of HDU for major vascular cases during the same period from 0% to 66%. However, despite a significant increase in the total number of major vascular operations performed, from 67 in 1991 to 185 in 2004 as a result of sub-specialisation, overall use of all high-care facilities fell as the number of patients returned directly to the vascular ward increased from 34% in 1991 to 64% in 2004. The efficacy of the choice of management venue was confirmed by the observation that only 7.7% of those managed on ICU had been initially managed at a lower level of care. In addition, only 1.8% of patients managed on HDU had been admitted after initially being managed on the vascular ward.
CONCLUSIONS: Sub-specialisation over the past decade has meant a significantly increased major vascular work-load. Since the introduction of the HDU, there has been a significant fall in the use of ICU facilities for routine cases. These changes in resource utilisation have significant implications in terms of budget allocation. It would appear that finances, in relation to vascular surgery, should be concentrated on expanding HDU facilities and ensuring vascular surgery expertise amongst ward nursing staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18492391      PMCID: PMC2647189          DOI: 10.1308/003588408X241980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  17 in total

1.  The evolution of a vascular surgeon at a district general hospital: is sub-specialisation inevitable?

Authors:  C D Sutton; J P Gilmour; D P Berry; M H Lewis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Carotid endarterectomy: perioperative and anesthetic considerations.

Authors:  H J Wilke; J E Ellis; J F McKinsey
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  The safety of immediate extubation after abdominal aortic surgery: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  J Cohen; J Loewinger; K Hutin; J Sulkes; A Zelikovski; P Singer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A survey of methods used for cardiac risk assessment prior to major vascular surgery.

Authors:  J A Michaels; S P Payne; R B Galland
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  Cost-efficient carotid surgery: a comprehensive evaluation.

Authors:  A D Ammar
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a hypertensive population.

Authors:  I M Williams; O D Hughes; E Townsend; R K Winter; M H Lewis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Overnight intensive recovery: elective open aortic surgery without a routine ICU bed.

Authors:  C J Callaghan; A G Lynch; I Amin; M Fazel; M J Lindop; M E Gaunt; K Varty
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 7.069

9.  The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  H A Ashton; M J Buxton; N E Day; L G Kim; T M Marteau; R A P Scott; S G Thompson; N M Walker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-11-16       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  A retrospective analysis of postoperative patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  S Uzman; Y Yilmaz; M Toptas; I Akkoc; Y G Gul; H Daskaya; Y Toptas
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Effects of the intermediate care unit on the oldest-old general surgical patients: a retrospective, pre- and postintervention study.

Authors:  Lichun Wang; Junpu Qing; Xiaofei Zhang; Lei Chen; Zheqing Li; Wen Xu; Lin Yao
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 3.  Triage of high-risk surgical patients for intensive care.

Authors:  Julia B Sobol; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Does intermediate care improve patient outcomes or reduce costs?

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Gordon D Rubenfeld
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.