Literature DB >> 18491228

Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles on fish cells in vitro.

William F Vevers1, Awadhesh N Jha.   

Abstract

Intrinsic genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of titanium dioxide (TiO2) engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) were evaluated in a metabolically competent, established fish cell line derived from rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss) gonadal tissue (i.e. RTG-2 cells). Prior to evaluation of the toxic potential, mean size of the ENPs was determined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). As a prerequisite, an extensive characterisation of the ENPs was carried out following sonication which enabled the synthesis of an efficient dosing strategy for the cells in which exposure in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) gave an optimal agglomeration effects compared to distilled water (H2O) and minimal essential media (MEM). Interaction of the ENPs with cells under scanning electron microscope (SEM) was also studied. The genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of the ENPs were determined either alone or in combination with ultraviolet radiation (i.e. UVA). Whilst genotoxic potential was determined by evaluating DNA strand breaks using single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) or the comet assay and induction of cytogenetic damage using cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus (MN) assay, cytotoxicity was determined by measuring the retention of supra vital stain, neutral red, by the lysosomes using the neutral red retention (NRR) assay. In addition, while performing the comet assay, lesion specific bacterial endonuclease, formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg), which recognises oxidised purine bases, was used to determine oxidative DNA damage. The results suggested that the highest concentration of the ENPs (i.e. 50 microg ml(-1)) did not produce elevations in DNA damage over 4 h (comet assay), 24 h (modified comet assay) or 48 h (MN assay) exposures in the absence of UVA irradiation, although there was a significant reduction in lysosomal integrity over 24 h exposure (NRR assay). The induction of MN did not show any enhanced levels as a function of ENP concentration. A significantly increased level of strand breaks was observed in combination with UVA (3 kJ m(-2)). In general, the NRR assay suggested elevated levels of cytotoxicity when the UVA exposure was carried out with MEM compared to PBS, although both showed an increase when in combination with the highest concentration of ENPs (i.e. 50 microg ml(-1)). Overall, the study emphasises the need for adoption of an holistic approach while evaluating the potential toxic effects of ENPs in which appropriate measures should be taken to avoid agglomeration or aggregation to facilitate efficient cellular uptake to evaluate potential biological responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18491228     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-008-0226-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  36 in total

Review 1.  Genotoxicological studies in aquatic organisms: an overview.

Authors:  Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Comparative eco-toxicity of nanoscale TiO2, SiO2, and ZnO water suspensions.

Authors:  Laura K Adams; Delina Y Lyon; Pedro J J Alvarez
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Oxidative damage to nucleic acids photosensitized by titanium dioxide.

Authors:  W G Wamer; J J Yin; R R Wei
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 4.  Marine invertebrate eco-genotoxicology: a methodological overview.

Authors:  David R Dixon; Audrey M Pruski; Linda R J Dixon; Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Induction of cytotoxicity by photoexcited TiO2 particles.

Authors:  R Cai; Y Kubota; T Shuin; H Sakai; K Hashimoto; A Fujishima
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Ultrafine titanium dioxide particles in the absence of photoactivation can induce oxidative damage to human bronchial epithelial cells.

Authors:  Jia-Ran Gurr; Alexander S S Wang; Chien-Hung Chen; Kun-Yan Jan
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.221

7.  Quantitative determination of OH radical generation and its cytotoxicity induced by TiO(2)-UVA treatment.

Authors:  T Uchino; H Tokunaga; M Ando; H Utsumi
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): gill injury, oxidative stress, and other physiological effects.

Authors:  Gillian Federici; Benjamin J Shaw; Richard D Handy
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 9.  A toxicologic review of quantum dots: toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors.

Authors:  Ron Hardman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Evidence that ultrafine titanium dioxide induces micronuclei and apoptosis in Syrian hamster embryo fibroblasts.

Authors:  Qamar Rahman; Mohtashim Lohani; Elke Dopp; Heidemarie Pemsel; Ludwig Jonas; Dieter G Weiss; Dietmar Schiffmann
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  35 in total

1.  Toxicity and genotoxicity of organic and inorganic nanoparticles to the bacteria Vibrio fischeri and Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  I Lopes; R Ribeiro; F E Antunes; T A P Rocha-Santos; M G Rasteiro; A M V M Soares; F Gonçalves; R Pereira
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  The effects of nanomaterials as endocrine disruptors.

Authors:  Ivo Iavicoli; Luca Fontana; Veruscka Leso; Antonio Bergamaschi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface.

Authors:  Andre E Nel; Lutz Mädler; Darrell Velegol; Tian Xia; Eric M V Hoek; Ponisseril Somasundaran; Fred Klaessig; Vince Castranova; Mike Thompson
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 4.  Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far?

Authors:  Richard D Handy; Nico van den Brink; Mark Chappell; Martin Mühling; Renata Behra; Maria Dušinská; Peter Simpson; Jukka Ahtiainen; Awadhesh N Jha; Jennifer Seiter; Anthony Bednar; Alan Kennedy; Teresa F Fernandes; Michael Riediker
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Towards a more representative in vitro method for fish ecotoxicology: morphological and biochemical characterisation of three-dimensional spheroidal hepatocytes.

Authors:  Matthew G Baron; Wendy M Purcell; Simon K Jackson; Stewart F Owen; Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of silica nanoparticles using fish cell lines.

Authors:  Nguyen T K Vo; Mary R Bufalino; Kurtis D Hartlen; Vladimir Kitaev; Lucy E J Lee
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Study of mitochondrial swelling, membrane fluidity and ROS production induced by nano-TiO2 and prevented by Fe incorporation.

Authors:  Tejal Barkhade; Santosh Kumar Mahapatra; Indrani Banerjee
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.524

8.  Phototoxicity of nano titanium dioxides in HaCaT keratinocytes--generation of reactive oxygen species and cell damage.

Authors:  Jun-Jie Yin; Jun Liu; Marilyn Ehrenshaft; Joan E Roberts; Peter P Fu; Ronald P Mason; Baozhong Zhao
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 9.  Cadmium-containing nanoparticles: perspectives on pharmacology and toxicology of quantum dots.

Authors:  Beverly A Rzigalinski; Jeannine S Strobl
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Anti-proliferative activity of silver nanoparticles.

Authors:  P V Asharani; M Prakash Hande; Suresh Valiyaveettil
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.