Literature DB >> 12435847

Marine invertebrate eco-genotoxicology: a methodological overview.

David R Dixon1, Audrey M Pruski, Linda R J Dixon, Awadhesh N Jha.   

Abstract

The last 25 years have seen major advances in the field of mammalian genotoxicology, particularly with the advent of molecular methods, some of which have spilled over into the relatively new field of eco-genotoxicology, which aims to evaluate the impact of contaminants on the natural biota. Unlike mammalian genotoxicology, where the focus is centred on a limited number of model species, efforts in the marine field have generally lacked coordination and focus, with the result that progress has been somewhat slow and fragmented. However, it is recognized that at the DNA and chromosome levels, marine invertebrates express qualitatively similar types of induced damage to that found in higher organisms (e.g. point mutations, strand breaks and chromosomal aberrations). Given that many of these species (bivalve molluscs, crustaceans, polychaete worms, etc.) are linked directly or indirectly to the human food chain, this is an important reason why one should be concerned about their exposure to environmental mutagens and carcinogens, particularly as many of these organisms have the capacity to (i) transform these agents to biologically active metabolites and (ii) accumulate toxicants in their cells and tissues at concentrations several orders of magnitude above that found in the environment. This review covers the advantages and limitations of those cytogenetic and molecular assays that have been used to address the question of genotoxicity in the cells and early life stages of selected marine invertebrate species. It concludes with the recommendation for the adoption of standardized test procedures, leading to a tiered approach in future eco-genotoxicity testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12435847     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/17.6.495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  26 in total

1.  Detecting micronuclei frequency in some aquatic organisms for monitoring pollution of Izmir Bay (Western Turkey).

Authors:  Ozlem Cakal Arslan; Hatice Parlak; Selma Katalay; Meltem Boyacioglu; Muhammet Ali Karaaslan; Hale Guner
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Contamination of bivalve haemolymph samples by adductor muscle components: implications for biomarker studies.

Authors:  Sherain N Al-Subiai; Awadhesh N Jha; A John Moody
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-12-14       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Mussel micronucleus cytome assay.

Authors:  Claudia Bolognesi; Michael Fenech
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far?

Authors:  Richard D Handy; Nico van den Brink; Mark Chappell; Martin Mühling; Renata Behra; Maria Dušinská; Peter Simpson; Jukka Ahtiainen; Awadhesh N Jha; Jennifer Seiter; Anthony Bednar; Alan Kennedy; Teresa F Fernandes; Michael Riediker
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Handling of Astyanax sp. for biomonitoring in Cangüiri Farm within a fountainhead (Iraí River Environment Preservation Area) through the use of genetic biomarkers.

Authors:  Wanessa Algarte Ramsdorf; Taynah Vicari; Marina I M de Almeida; Roberto Ferreira Artoni; Marta Margarete Cestari
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Microelectrophoretic study of environmentally induced DNA damage in fish and its use for early toxicity screening of freshwater bodies.

Authors:  Bilal Hussain; Tayyaba Sultana; Salma Sultana; K A Al-Ghanim; Shahreef Masood; Muhammad Ali; Shahid Mahboob
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Genotoxic effects of the herbicide Roundup(®) in the fish Corydoras paleatus (Jenyns 1842) after short-term, environmentally low concentration exposure.

Authors:  Nédia de Castilhos Ghisi; Marta Margarete Cestari
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Using the pea aphid Acrythociphon pisum as a tool for screening biological responses to chemicals and drugs.

Authors:  Aviv Dombrovsky; Terence Neil Ledger; Gilbert Engler; Alain Robichon
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-09-16

9.  Variation in genotoxic susceptibility and biomarker responses in Cirrhinus mrigala and Catla catla from different ecological niches of the Chenab River.

Authors:  Bilal Hussain; Tayyaba Sultana; Salma Sultana; Shahid Mahboob; K A Al-Ghanim; Shahid Nadeem
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles on fish cells in vitro.

Authors:  William F Vevers; Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.