Literature DB >> 18491185

Annoyances, disruptions, and interruptions in surgery: the Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI).

Nick Sevdalis1, Damien Forrest, Shabnam Undre, Ara Darzi, Charles Vincent.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have investigated disruptions to surgical process via observation. We developed the Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI) to assess operating room professionals' self-perceptions of disruptions that affect surgical processes. MATERIALS: The DiSI assesses individual issues, operating room environment, communication, coordination/situational awareness, patient-related disruptions, team cohesion, and organizational issues. Sixteen surgeons, 26 nurses, and 20 anesthetists/operating departmental practitioners participated. Participants judged for themselves and for their colleagues how often each disruption occurs, its contribution to error, and obstruction of surgical goals.
RESULTS: We combined the team cohesion and organizational disruptions to improve reliability. All participants judged that individual issues, operating room environment, and communication issues affect others more often and more severely than one's self. Surgeons reported significantly fewer disruptions than nurses or anesthetists.
CONCLUSION: Although operating room professionals acknowledged disruptions and their impact, they attributed disruptions related to individual performance and attitudes more to their colleagues than to themselves. The cross-professional discrepancy in perceived disruptions (surgeons perceiving fewer than the other two groups) suggests that attempts to improve the surgical environment should always start with thorough assessment of the views of all its users. DiSI is useful in that it differentiates between the frequency and the severity of disruptions. Further research should explore correlations of DiSI-assessed perceptions and other observable measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18491185     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9624-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  26 in total

1.  A systems approach to surgical safety.

Authors:  J F Calland; S Guerlain; R B Adams; C G Tribble; E Foley; E G Chekan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement.

Authors:  Charles Vincent; Krishna Moorthy; Sudip K Sarker; Avril Chang; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature.

Authors:  S Yule; R Flin; S Paterson-Brown; N Maran
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Observational assessment of surgical teamwork: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Shabnam Undre; Andrew N Healey; Ara Darzi; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Distracting communications in the operating theatre.

Authors:  Nick Sevdalis; Andrew N Healey; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 6.  Objective assessment of technical performance.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Managing intraoperative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training program?

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis; Debra Nestel; Tanya Tierney; Maria Woloshynowych; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams.

Authors:  Nick Sevdalis; Rachel Davis; Mary Koutantji; Shabnam Undre; Ara Darzi; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Environmental psychology 1989-1994.

Authors:  E Sundstrom; P A Bell; P L Busby; C Asmus
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS): refinement and application in urological surgery.

Authors:  Shabnam Undre; Nick Sevdalis; Andrew N Healey; Ara Darzi; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  27 in total

1.  The Imperial Stress Assessment Tool (ISAT): a feasible, reliable and valid approach to measuring stress in the operating room.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Tanya Tierney; Nick Sevdalis; Rajesh Aggarwal; Debra Nestel; Maria Woloshynowych; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Surgical flow disruptions: measurement and impact of stressful events in the operating room.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments.

Authors:  Nick Sevdalis; Shabnam Undre; James McDermott; Jasdeep Giddie; Lila Diner; Gillian Smith
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Stress impairs psychomotor performance in novice laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis; Rajesh Aggarwal; Pramudith Sirimanna; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Safety in the OR: who's in and who's out?

Authors:  Debra Sudan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Intra-operative disruptions, surgeon's mental workload, and technical performance in a full-scale simulated procedure.

Authors:  Matthias Weigl; Philipp Stefan; Kamyar Abhari; Patrick Wucherer; Pascal Fallavollita; Marc Lazarovici; Simon Weidert; Ekkehard Euler; Ken Catchpole
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Assessing the Safety of Custom Web-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Electronic Health Records: A Case Study.

Authors:  Jeritt G Thayer; Jeffrey M Miller; Alexander G Fiks; Linda Tague; Robert W Grundmeier
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  Ergonomics perspective for identifying and reducing internal operative flow disruption for laparoscopic urological surgery.

Authors:  Latif Al-Hakim; Jiaquan Xiao; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A cross-sectional observation of burnout in a sample of Irish junior doctors.

Authors:  G J Nason; S Liddy; T Murphy; E M Doherty
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  The impact of intra-operative interruptions on surgeons' perceived workload: an observational study in elective general and orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Matthias Weigl; Sophia Antoniadis; Costanza Chiapponi; Christiane Bruns; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.