Literature DB >> 18491165

Maps of interaural time difference in the chicken's brainstem nucleus laminaris.

Christine Köppl1, Catherine E Carr.   

Abstract

Animals, including humans, use interaural time differences (ITDs) that arise from different sound path lengths to the two ears as a cue of horizontal sound source location. The nature of the neural code for ITD is still controversial. Current models differentiate between two population codes: either a map-like rate-place code of ITD along an array of neurons, consistent with a large body of data in the barn owl, or a population rate code, consistent with data from small mammals. Recently, it was proposed that these different codes reflect optimal coding strategies that depend on head size and sound frequency. The chicken makes an excellent test case of this proposal because its physical prerequisites are similar to small mammals, yet it shares a more recent common ancestry with the owl. We show here that, like in the barn owl, the brainstem nucleus laminaris in mature chickens displayed the major features of a place code of ITD. ITD was topographically represented in the maximal responses of neurons along each isofrequency band, covering approximately the contralateral acoustic hemisphere. Furthermore, the represented ITD range appeared to change with frequency, consistent with a pressure gradient receiver mechanism in the avian middle ear. At very low frequencies, below 400 Hz, maximal neural responses were symmetrically distributed around zero ITD and it remained unclear whether there was a topographic representation. These findings do not agree with the above predictions for optimal coding and thus revive the discussion as to what determines the neural coding strategies for ITDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18491165      PMCID: PMC3170859          DOI: 10.1007/s00422-008-0220-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  51 in total

Review 1.  Reassessing mechanisms of low-frequency sound localisation.

Authors:  Alan R Palmer
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  A physiologically based model of interaural time difference discrimination.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cross correlation by neurons of the medial superior olive: a reexamination.

Authors:  Ranjan Batra; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-06-17

4.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization.

Authors:  J M Goldberg; P B Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Spatial mapping of intracranial auditory events for various degrees of interaural coherence.

Authors:  J Blauert; W Lindemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency neurons in inferior colliculus of the cat. III. Effects of changing frequency.

Authors:  T C Yin; S Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Detectability of a pulsed tone in the presence of a masker with time-varying interaural correlation.

Authors:  D W Grantham; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: tonotopic organization of n. magnocellularis and n. laminaris.

Authors:  E W Rubel; T N Parks
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1975-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: organization of projections from n. magnocellularis to n. laminaris.

Authors:  T N Parks; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1975-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Frequency-specific projections of individual neurons in chick brainstem auditory nuclei.

Authors:  S R Young; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  54 in total

1.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Sound-intensity-dependent compensation for the small interaural time difference cue for sound source localization.

Authors:  Eri Nishino; Rei Yamada; Hiroshi Kuba; Hiroyuki Hioki; Takahiro Furuta; Takeshi Kaneko; Harunori Ohmori
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Two GABAA responses with distinct kinetics in a sound localization circuit.

Authors:  Zheng-Quan Tang; Yong Lu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Control of a depolarizing GABAergic input in an auditory coincidence detection circuit.

Authors:  Zheng-Quan Tang; Hongxiang Gao; Yong Lu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Sound localization in the alligator.

Authors:  Hilary S Bierman; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  Inhibition in the balance: binaurally coupled inhibitory feedback in sound localization circuitry.

Authors:  R Michael Burger; Iwao Fukui; Harunori Ohmori; Edwin W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Binaural processing by the gecko auditory periphery.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Yezhong Tang; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Tonotopic tuning in a sound localization circuit.

Authors:  Sean J Slee; Matthew H Higgs; Adrienne L Fairhall; William J Spain
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Mechanisms for adjusting interaural time differences to achieve binaural coincidence detection.

Authors:  Armin H Seidl; Edwin W Rubel; David M Harris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The Binaural Interaction Component in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Presents few Differences to Mammalian Data.

Authors:  Nicolas Palanca-Castan; Geneviève Laumen; Darrin Reed; Christine Köppl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.