Cladosporium chlorocephalum (= C. paeoniae) is a common, widespread leaf-spotting hyphomycete of peony (Paeonia spp.), characterised by having dimorphic conidiophores. During the season, one stage of this fungus causes distinct, necrotic leaf-blotch symptoms on living leaves of Paeonia spp. In late autumn, winter or after overwintering, a second morphologically distinct conidiophore type occurs on dead, blackish, rotting stems. Conspecificity of the two morphs, previously proposed on the basis of observations in culture, was supported by DNA sequence data from the ITS and LSU gene regions, using cultures obtained from leaf-blotch symptoms on living leaves, as well as from dead stems of Paeonia spp. Sequence data were identical, indicating a single species with two morphs. On account of its distinct conidiogenous loci and conidial hila, as well as its sequence-based phylogenetic position separate from the Davidiella/Cladosporium clade, the peony fungus has to be excluded from Cladosporium s. str., but still belongs to the Davidiellaceae (Capnodiales). The leaf-blotching (cladosporioid) morph of this fungus morphologically resembles species of Fusicladium, but differs in having dimorphic fruiting, and is phylogenetically distant from the Venturiaceae. The macronematous (periconioid) morph resembles Metulocladosporiella (Chaetothyriales), but lacks rhizoid conidiophore hyphae, and has 0-5-septate conidia. Hence, C. chlorocephalum is assigned to the new genus Dichocladosporium.
Cladosporium chlorocephalum (= C. paeoniae) is a common, widespread leaf-spotting hyphomycete of peony (Paeonia spp.), characterised by having dimorphic conidiophores. During the season, one stage of this fungus causes distinct, necrotic leaf-blotch symptoms on living leaves of Paeonia spp. In late autumn, winter or after overwintering, a second morphologically distinct conidiophore type occurs on dead, blackish, rotting stems. Conspecificity of the two morphs, previously proposed on the basis of observations in culture, was supported by DNA sequence data from the ITS and LSU gene regions, using cultures obtained from leaf-blotch symptoms on living leaves, as well as from dead stems of Paeonia spp. Sequence data were identical, indicating a single species with two morphs. On account of its distinct conidiogenous loci and conidial hila, as well as its sequence-based phylogenetic position separate from the Davidiella/Cladosporium clade, the peony fungus has to be excluded from Cladosporium s. str., but still belongs to the Davidiellaceae (Capnodiales). The leaf-blotching (cladosporioid) morph of this fungus morphologically resembles species of Fusicladium, but differs in having dimorphic fruiting, and is phylogenetically distant from the Venturiaceae. The macronematous (periconioid) morph resembles Metulocladosporiella (Chaetothyriales), but lacks rhizoid conidiophore hyphae, and has 0-5-septate conidia. Hence, C. chlorocephalum is assigned to the new genus Dichocladosporium.
Fresenius (1850) described
Periconia chlorocephala Fresen. from Germany on dead stems of
Paeonia sp. Mason & Ellis
(1953) examined this species
in vitro and in vivo and stated that it only occurred on
dead stems of Paeonia spp. They described, illustrated and discussed
this species in detail, and reallocated it to the genus Cladosporium
Link.A second, cladosporioid hyphomycete on Paeonia spp.,
Cladosporium paeoniae Pass., was collected by Passerini on living
leaves of P. albiflora (as P. edulis) in Italy, and
distributed in Thümen, Herbarium mycologicum oeconomicum, Fasc. IX, No.
416 (1876), together with the first valid description, which was repeated by
Passerini (1876). Later,
Passerini collected this fungus on Paeonia officinalis at Parma in
Italy and distributed it in Thümen, Mycotheca universalis, No. 670
(1877). Saccardo (1882) listed
a collection of this species on Paeonia anomala from Russia, Siberia,
which he later described as Cladosporium paeoniae var.
paeoniae-anomalae Sacc. (Saccardo
1886). A first examination of C. paeoniae in culture was
accomplished by Meuli (1937),
followed by a treatment in vitro by de Vries
(1952). Mason & Ellis
(1953) described and
illustrated in their treatment of C. chlorocephalum
macroconidiophores, agreeing with those of the original diagnosis and
illustration of Periconia chlorocephala, as well as
semi-macronematous conidiophores concurring with those of C.
paeoniae, although no mention was made of the latter name. McKemy &
Morgan-Jones (1991) carried
out comprehensive studies on Cladosporium on Paeonia spp.
in vitro and in vivo, including detailed discussions of the
history of the taxa concerned, taxonomic implications and comprehensive
descriptions and illustrations. They concluded that Cladosporium
paeoniae, found in culture together with C. chlorocephalum, was
a semi-macronematous form (synanamorph) of the latter species, and reduced
C. paeoniae to synonymy with the latter species.In the present study, re-examination and reassessment of morphological
characters, conidiogenesis, and DNA sequence data of the ITS and 28S nrDNA
were used to confirm the identity of Cladosporium chlorocephalum (the
periconioid morph) and C. paeoniae (the cladosporioid morph), and
clarify their relation to Cladosporium s. str.
(Davidiellaceae) (emend.
David 1997,
Braun ).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolates
Single-conidial isolates were obtained from symptomatic leaves and dead
stems, and cultured as detailed in Crous
(1998). Cultural
characteristics and morphology of isolates
(Table 1) were recorded from
plates containing either 2 % potato-dextrose agar (PDA) or synthetic
nutrient-poor agar (SNA) (Gams ). Plates were incubated at 25 °C under
continuous near-UV light to promote sporulation.
Table 1.
Isolates subjected to DNA analysis and morphological examination.
Species
Accession
number1
Host
Country
Collector
GenBank accession number
Dichocladosporium chlorocephalum
CBS 213.73; IMI
048108a
Paeonia sp.
United Kingdom
F. Rilstone
EU009455
CBS 100405
Paeonia sp.
New Zealand
M. Braithwaite
EU009456
CBS 121522; CPC
11383
Paeonia delavayi
Germany
K. Schubert
EU009457
CBS
121523*;
CPC 11969
Paeonia officinalis
Germany
K. Schubert
EU009458
CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC:
Culture collection of Pedro Crous, housed at CBS; IMI: International
Mycological Institute, CABI-Bioscience, Egham, Bakeham Lane, U.K.
Ex-type cultures.
Isolates subjected to DNA analysis and morphological examination.CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC:
Culture collection of Pedro Crous, housed at CBS; IMI: International
Mycological Institute, CABI-Bioscience, Egham, Bakeham Lane, U.K.Ex-type cultures.
DNA isolation, amplification and sequencing
Fungal colonies were established on agar plates, and genomic DNA was
isolated following the protocol of Lee & Taylor
(1990). The primers V9G
(de Hoog & Gerrits van den Ende
1998) and LR5 (Vilgalys &
Hester 1990) were used to amplify part (ITS) of the nuclear rDNA
operon spanning the 3' end of the 18S rRNA gene (SSU), the first internal
transcribed spacer (ITS1), the 5.8S rRNA gene, the second ITS region and the
5' end of the 28S rRNA gene (LSU). The primers ITS4
(White ),
LR0R (Rehner & Samuels
1994), LR3R
(www.biology.duke.edu/fungi/mycolab/primers.htm)
and LR16 (Moncalvo ) were used as internal sequence primers to ensure good
quality sequences over the entire length of the amplicon. The PCR conditions,
sequence alignment and subsequent phylogenetic analysis followed the methods
of Crous et al.
(2006b). Gaps longer than 10
bases were coded as single events for the phylogenetic analyses; the remaining
gaps were treated as new character states. Sequence data were deposited in
GenBank (Table 1) and
alignments in TreeBASE
(www.treebase.org).
Morphology
Morphological examinations were made from herbarium samples, fresh
symptomatic leaves and stems, as well as cultures sporulating on SNA.
Structures were mounted in water or Shear's solution
(Dhingra & Sinclair 1985),
and 30 measurements at × 1 000 magnification were made of each structure
under an Olympus BX 50 microscope (Hamburg, Germany). The 95 % confidence
levels were determined and the extremes of spore measurements given in
parentheses. Scanning electron microscopic examinations were conducted at the
Institute of Zoology, Martin-Luther-University, Halle (Saale), Germany, using
a Hitachi S-2400. Samples were coated with a thin layer of gold applied with a
sputter coater SCD 004 (200 s in an argon atmosphere of 20 mA, 30 mm distant
from the electrode). Colony colours were noted after 2 wk growth on PDA at 25
°C in the dark, using the colour charts of Rayner
(1970). All cultures studied
were deposited in the culture collection of the Centraalbureau voor
Schimmelcultures (CBS), Utrecht, the Netherlands
(Table 1). Taxonomic novelties
were lodged with MycoBank
(www.MycoBank.org).
RESULTS
DNA phylogeny
Amplification products of approximately 1 700 bases were obtained for the
isolates listed in Table 1. The
ITS region of the sequences was used to obtain additional sequences from
GenBank which were added to the alignment. The manually adjusted alignment
contained 26 sequences (including the two outgroup sequences) and 518
characters including alignment gaps. Of the 518 characters used in the
phylogenetic analysis, 226 were parsimony-informative, 33 were variable and
parsimony-uninformative, and 259 were constant. Neighbour-joining analysis
using three substitution models on the sequence data yielded trees supporting
the same clades but with a different arrangement at the deeper nodes. These
nodes were supported poorly in the bootstrap analyses (the highest value
observed for one of these nodes was 64 %; data not shown).Two equally most parsimonious trees (TL = 585 steps; CI = 0.761; RI =
0.902; RC = 0.686), one of which is shown in
Fig. 1, was obtained from the
parsimony analysis of the ITS region. The Dichocladosporium K.
Schub., U. Braun & Crous isolates formed a well-supported clade (100 %
bootstrap support), distinct from clades containing species of
Davidiella Crous & U. Braun, Mycosphaerella Johanson and
Teratosphaeria Syd. & P. Syd. This placement was also supported
by analyses of the first part of the 28S rRNA gene (see
Crous -
this volume).
Fig. 1.
One of two equally most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search
with 100 random taxon additions of the ITS sequence alignment. The scale bar
shows 10 changes, and bootstrap support values from 1 000 replicates are shown
at the nodes. Thickened lines indicate the strict consensus branches. The tree
was rooted to two Botryosphaeria species.
Taxonomy
Because conidia formed holoblastically in simple or branched acropetal
chains, Cladosporium chlorocephalum and C. paeoniae
coincided with previous concepts of Cladosporium s. lat.
(Braun ,
Schubert 2005), belonging to a
wide assemblage of genera classified by Kiffer & Morelet
(1999) as
“Acroblastosporae”. Previous studies conducted in
vitro concluded that Cladosporium chlorocephalum and C.
paeoniae represent two developmental stages (morphs) of a single species,
a result confirmed here by DNA sequence analyses. A detailed analysis of
conidiogenesis, structure of the conidiogenous loci and conidial hila, and a
comparison with Cladosporium s. str., typified by C.
herbarum (Pers. : Fr.) Link, revealed obvious differences: The
conidiogenous loci and conidial hila of C. chlorocephalum are quite
distinct from those of Cladosporium s. str. by being denticulate or
subdenticulate, apically broadly truncate, unthickened or slightly thickened,
but somewhat darkened-refractive. The scars in Cladosporium s. str.
are, however, characteristically coronate, i.e., with a central convex dome
surrounded by a raised periclinal rim
(David 1997,
Braun ,
Schubert 2005). Hence, the
peony fungus has to be excluded from Cladosporium s. str. A
comparison with phaeoblastic hyphomycetous genera revealed a close similarity
of this fungus with the genus Metulocladosporiella Crous, Schroers,
J.Z. Groenew., U. Braun & K. Schub. recently introduced for the
Cladosporium speckle disease of banana
(Crous ).
Both fungi have dimorphic fruiting, pigmented macronematous conidiophores
often with distinct basal swellings and densely branched terminal heads
composed of short branchlets and ramoconidia, denticulate or subdenticulate
unthickened, but somewhat darkened-refractive conidiogenous loci, as well as
phaeoblastic conidia, formed in simple or branched acropetal chains. The
semi-macronematous leaf-blotching morph is close to and barely distinguishable
from Fusicladium Bonord. However, unlike
Metulocladosporiella, the peony fungus does not form rhizoid hyphae
at the base of conidiophore swellings and the conidia are amero- to
phragmosporous [0-5-septate versus 0(-1)-septate in
Metulocladosporiella]. Furthermore, the peony fungus neither clusters
within the Chaetothyriales (with Metulocladosporiella) nor
within the Venturiaceae (with Fusicladium), but clusters
basal to the Davidiellaceae (see also
Crous -
this volume). Hence, we propose to place C. chlorocephalum in the new
genus Dichocladosporium.K. Schub., U. Braun & Crous, gen.
nov. MycoBank
MB504428. Figs
2,
3,
4 and
5.
Fig. 2.
Dichocladosporium chlorocephalum (HAL 1924 F), periconioid, stem
rotting morph. Conidiophores and conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Fig. 3.
Dichocladosporium chlorocephalum
(CBS 121523 = CPC
11969). A-B. Symptoms of the periconioid, stem rotting morph. C-E, H.
Macroconidiophores and conidia. F-G. Semi-macronematous conidiophores and
conidia. I-J. Ramoconidia and conidia. K-M. Scanning electron microscopic
photographs. K. Conidiophores. L. Conidial chain. M. Single conidium showing
the surface ornamentation and scar structure. Scale bars: C-J, L = 10 μm; K
= 100 μm; M = 2 μm.
Fig. 4.
Dichocladosporium chlorocephalum (HAL 2011 F), cladosporioid,
leaf-spotting morph. Conidiophores and conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Fig. 5.
Dichocladosporium chlorocephalum
(CBS 121522 = CPC
11383). A-B. Symptoms on leaves of Paeonia officinalis and P.
delavayi caused by the cladosporioid, leaf spotting morph. C-D.
Conidiophores and conidia. E. Ramoconidia and conidia. F-G. Scanning electron
microscopic photographs. F. Conidial chain still attached to a conidiophore.
G. Conidia showing surface ornamentation and scar structure. Scale bars: C-E,
G = 10 μm; F = 5 μm.
Etymology: dicha in Greek = twofold.Differt a Metulocladosporiella conidiophoris cum cellulis
basalibus saepe inflatis, sed sine hyphis rhizoidibus, conidiis amero- ad
phragmosporis (0-5-septatis).Type species: Dichocladosporium chlorocephalum (Fresen.) K.
Schub., U. Braun & Crous, comb. nov.(Fresen.) K. Schub., U.
Braun & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504429. Figs
2,
3,
4 and
5.Basionym: Periconia chlorocephala Fresen., Beiträge
zur Mykologie 1: 21. 1850.≡ Haplographium chlorocephalum (Fresen.) Grove, Sci. Gossip
21: 198. 1885.≡ Graphiopsis chlorocephala (Fresen.) Trail, Scott.
Naturalist (Perth) 10: 75. 1889.≡ Cladosporium chlorocephalum (Fresen.) E.W. Mason &
M.B. Ellis, Mycol. Pap. 56: 123. 1953.= Cladosporium paeoniae Pass., in Thümen, Herb. Mycol.
Oecon., Fasc. IX, No. 416. 1876, and in Just́s
Bot. Jahresber. 4: 235. 1876.= Periconia ellipsospora Penz. & Sacc., Atti Reale Ist. Veneto
Sci. Lett. Arti, Ser. 6, 2: 596. 1884.= Cladosporium paeoniae var. paeoniae-anomalae Sacc.,
Syll. Fung. 4: 351. 1886.= Haplographium chlorocephalum var. ovalisporum Ferraris,
Fl. Ital. Cryptog., Hyphales: 875. 1914.Descriptions: Mason & Ellis
(1953: 123-126), McKemy &
Morgan-Jones (1991: 140-144),
Schubert (2005: 216).Illustrations: Fresenius
(1850: Pl. IV, figs 10-15),
Mason & Ellis (1953:
124-125, figs 42-43), McKemy & Morgan-Jones
(1991: 137,
fig. 1; 141,
fig. 2; 139, pl. 1; 143, pl.
2), Schubert (2005: 217, fig.
113; 275, pl. 34).One of two equally most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search
with 100 random taxon additions of the ITS sequence alignment. The scale bar
shows 10 changes, and bootstrap support values from 1 000 replicates are shown
at the nodes. Thickened lines indicate the strict consensus branches. The tree
was rooted to two Botryosphaeria species.Dichocladosporium chlorocephalum (HAL 1924 F), periconioid, stem
rotting morph. Conidiophores and conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm.Dichocladosporium chlorocephalum
(CBS 121523 = CPC
11969). A-B. Symptoms of the periconioid, stem rotting morph. C-E, H.
Macroconidiophores and conidia. F-G. Semi-macronematous conidiophores and
conidia. I-J. Ramoconidia and conidia. K-M. Scanning electron microscopic
photographs. K. Conidiophores. L. Conidial chain. M. Single conidium showing
the surface ornamentation and scar structure. Scale bars: C-J, L = 10 μm; K
= 100 μm; M = 2 μm.Characters of the cladosporioid morph: Leaf-blotch
symptoms on living leaves amphigenous, variable in shape and size,
subcircularoval to irregular, broad, oblong to expanded, up to 30 mm long and
20 mm wide, at times covering the entire leaf surface, forming
olivaceous-brown to blackish brown patches, rarely violet-brown, margin
usually indefinite, attacked areas turning dry with age, also occurring on
young, green stems. Colonies amphigenous, punctiform to effuse, loose
to dense, caespitose, brown, villose. Mycelium immersed, subcuticular
to intraepidermal; hyphae sparingly branched, 4-7(-10) μm wide, septate,
sometimes with swellings and constrictions, swollen cells up to 13 μm diam,
subhyaline to pale brown, smooth, walls thickened, hyphae sometimes
aggregated; in vitro mycelium at first mainly immersed, later also
superficial, branched, 1-5(-7) μm wide, pluriseptate, often constricted at
septa and with swellings and constrictions, therefore irregular in outline,
smooth to verruculose or irregularly rough-walled, loosely verruculose with
distinct large warts. Semimacronematous conidiophores formed on
leaf-blotches solitary or in small, loose groups, arising from internal hyphae
or swollen hyphal cells, erumpent through the cuticle, occasionally emerging
through stomata, erect, straight to somewhat flexuous, oblong-cylindrical,
usually unbranched or occasionally branched, 13-80(-120) × (4-)5-8(-10)
μm, slightly attenuated towards the apex, septate, septa often dense,
unconstricted, pale to medium brown, sometimes paler towards the apex, smooth,
thick-walled, wall often with two distinct layers, often somewhat inflated at
the very base, up to 14 μm diam, occasionally proliferating
enteroblastically; in vitro conidiophores arising laterally from
plagiotropous hyphae or terminally from ascending hyphae, the latter usually
appearing more filiform than those arising laterally from plagiotropous
hyphae, erect, straight to slightly flexuous, cylindrical-oblong, not
geniculate, usually unbranched, rarely with a short lateral prolongation near
the apex, 18-60(-100) × 3-6 μm, slightly attenuated towards the apex,
septate, pale to medium brown or olivaceous-brown, smooth to asperulate, walls
somewhat thickened. Conidiogenous cells integrated, terminal or
intercalary, subcylindrical, 7-45 μm long, proliferation sympodial, with
one to several conidiogenous loci, subdenticulate or denticulate, protuberant,
terminally broadly truncate, 1.5-3 μm wide, unthickened or almost so,
somewhat darkened-refractive. Conidia catenate, in simple or branched
chains, polymorphous, small conidia globose, subglobose, broadly obovoid, 3-9
× 3-5 μm, aseptate, pale to medium brown, smooth, intercalary conidia
limoniform, ellipsoid-fusiform, oblong, 5-23 × 3.5-6.5 μm,
0-2-septate, medium brown, smooth to minutely verruculose or irregularly
rough-walled, large conidia ellipsoid, oblong-cylindrical, ampulliform,
22-45(-52) × (4.5-)5-8 μm, 0-5-septate, medium brown, smooth to
minutely verruculose or irregularly rough-walled, walls somewhat thickened,
hila truncate, 1-3 μm wide, unthickened or almost so, somewhat
darkened-refractive; occasionally with microcyclic conidiogenesis; in
vitro numerous, polymorphous, catenate, in loosely branched chains, small
conidia globose, subglobose, or obovoid, 3-8 × 3-4 μm, aseptate,
intercalary conidia limoniform to ellipsoid-fusiform, 9-18 × 3.5-4.5
μm, 0-1-septate, large conidia ellipsoid to cylindrical-oblong, 14-30(-38)
× 3-6(-7) μm, 0-3-septate, pale to medium brown, asperulate, minutely
verruculose to irregularly rough-walled, walls thickened, hila usually short
denticle-like, protuberant, truncate, in smaller conidia 0.5-1.8 μm wide,
in larger conidia (1.5-)2-3 μm wide, unthickened or almost so but usually
darkened-refractive; with occasional microcyclic conidiogenesis.Dichocladosporium chlorocephalum (HAL 2011 F), cladosporioid,
leaf-spotting morph. Conidiophores and conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm.Characters of the periconioid morph: Macronematous
conidiophores formed on faded or dead stems in late autumn, winter or
after overwintering; colonies at first visible as reddish brown streaks, later
turning olivaceous-brown to black, sometimes linear, sometimes encircling the
stems, often occupying large stem segments, effuse, densely caespitose,
velvety. Mycelium immersed, subcuticular to intraepidermal; hyphae at
first sparsely branched, 3-7 μm wide, septate, not constricted at the
septa, becoming swollen and wider, up to 11 μm wide, often branched, pale
to medium olivaceous-brown, walls thickened, forming loose to dense hyphal
aggregations; in vitro mycelium immersed to superficial, loosely
branched, 2-6(-7) μm wide, pluriseptate, usually without swellings and
constrictions, subhyaline to medium brown or olivaceous-brown, almost smooth
to asperulate or irregularly rough-walled, in older colonies on PDA up to 10
μm wide, sometimes single hyphal cells distinctly swollen, up to 16(-20)
μm wide, mainly at the base of conidiophores, sometimes covered by a slime
coat or enveloped in a polysaccharide-like layer. Stromata
well-developed, large and expanded, up to about 50-320 μm in length, 15-30
μm deep, composed of a single to several layers of swollen pale to medium
brown stromatic cells, 5-18 μm diam, thick-walled. Conidiophores
solitary or in loose groups, arising from swollen hyphal cells or stromata,
erumpent through the cuticle, erect, straight, rigid to slightly flexuous,
150-680 μm long, composed of a subcylindrical stipe, 13-24 μm wide at
the base, slightly attenuated towards the apex, 5-15 μm just below the
branched head, pluriseptate, not constricted at the septa, young conidiophores
pale medium olivaceous-brown, later medium to usually dark brown, sometimes
slightly paler at the distal end, smooth or almost so, often appearing
somewhat granular, roughened, walls distinctly thickened, 1.5-3(-4) μm
wide; apex with a roughly subglobose to ovoid head, about 35-70 μm diam,
composed of dense branchlets and ramoconidia, primary branchlets close to the
apex and below the first and sometimes second and third septa, solitary, in
pairs or small verticils, appressed against the stipe or somewhat divergent,
subcylindrical to ellipsoid-oval, aseptate, rarely 1-septate, pale olivaceous
to dark brown, 10-20 × 5-8.5 μm; in vitro conidiophores
initially micro- and semimacronematous, then progressively macronematous as
colonies age, arising laterally from plagiotropous hyphae or terminally from
ascending hyphae, sometimes also from swollen hyphal cells; micronematous
conidiophores filiform, narrowly cylindrical-oblong, unbranched, up to 150
μm long, 2-3.5 μm wide, septate, septa often appear to be darkened, pale
to pale medium olivaceous-brown, asperulate, walls slightly thickened;
semimacronematous conidiophores often resembling those formed by the
leaf-blotching (cladosporioid) morph on the natural host, subcylindrical to
cylindrical-oblong, straight to slightly flexuous, unbranched, rarely
branched, (10-)15-120 × 3-5(-6) μm, slightly attenuated towards the
apex, septate, medium brown, minutely verruculose to irregularly rough-walled,
walls more or less thickened; macronematous conidiophores formed in older
cultures on SNA, PDA and also MEA (according to
McKemy & Morgan-Jones
1991), but more prominent on PDA and MEA, resembling those formed
by the stem-rotting morph (i.e., the periconioid morph, in planta), consisting
of a long unbranched stipe and a subglobose head, but in culture the heads are
often more loosely branched than on the natural substratum, not always forming
a compact head, up to 580 μm long, 5-13 μm wide, attenuated towards the
apex, 4-8 μm just below the branched upper part, somewhat swollen at the
base, septate, medium to very dark brown, minutely verruculose, walls
distinctly thickened, two distinct wall layers visible, 1-2 μm thick.
Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, integrated, terminal, intercalary or
even discrete, ellipsoid to cylindrical or doliiform, subdenticulate,
proliferation sympodial, multilocal, conidiogenous loci truncate, flat,
unthickened, 1-3 μm wide, somewhat darkened-refractive; in culture
conidiogenous loci appearing to be somewhat thickened and distinctly
darkened-refractive, 1-2.5(-3) μm wide. Conidia catenate, in long,
branched chains, straight, subglobose, aseptate, 3.5-7 μm diam, or
ellipsoid-ovoid, 6-15 × 4-9 μm, 0(-1)-septate, pale olivaceous to
olivaceous-brown, smooth to verruculose (under the light microscope), hila
flat, truncate, unthickened, (0.5-)1-2(-2.5) μm wide, not darkened, but
somewhat refractive; in vitro conidia numerous, catenate, formed in
long, branched chains, small conidia globose to subglobose, (2-)3-7 ×
(2-)3-4 μm, aseptate, intercalary ones ellipsoid-ovoid, 6-16 × 3.5-5
μm, 0(-1)-septate, secondary ramoconidia ellipsoid to
cylindrical-oblong, (13-)15-34(-47) × (3-)4-6(-7) μm, 0-2-septate,
sometimes slightly constricted at the septa, medium olivaceous-brown,
verruculose or irregularly rough-walled, walls slightly to distinctly
thickened, hila more or less protuberant, subdenticulate to denticulate, in
small and intercalary conidia 0.5-1(-1.5) μm, in secondary ramoconidia
1-2.5(-3) μm, unthickened or somewhat thickened, darkened-refractive;
occasional microcyclic conidiogenesis.Cultural characteristics: Colonies on PDA at first whitish or
smoke grey, reverse smoke-grey to olivaceous-grey, with age smoke-grey to
olivaceous or olivaceous-grey, sometimes even dark mouse-grey, reverse
iron-grey to dark mouse-grey or black, felty; margin white to smoke-grey,
narrow to more or less broad, regular to slightly undulate, glabrous to
somewhat feathery; aerial mycelium at first mainly in the colony centre, with
age abundantly formed, covering almost the whole colony, whitish, smoke-grey
to olivaceous, felty; growth low convex to raised; numerous small exudates
formed, sometimes becoming prominent; fertile.Specimens examined: Czechoslovakia, Bohemia, Turnau, on
leaves of Paeonia arborea, 15 Sep. 1905, J.E. Kabát,
Kabát & Bubák, Fungi Imperf. Exs. 396, B 70-6669.
France, on dead stems of Paeonia sp., 1901, ex Herbario Musei
Parisiensis, ex herb. Magnus, exs. Desmazières, Pl. Crypt. N. France,
Ed. 2, Ser. 1, 1621, HBG, as “Periconia atra”;
Chailly-en-Biere, Seine-et-Marne, Feuilleaubois, on stems of P.
officinalis, 27 Mar. 1881, Roumeguère, Fungi Sel. Gall. Exs. 1803,
HBG, as “Periconia atra”. Germany,
Baden-Würtemberg, Kreis Tübingen, Drusslingen, on leaves of P.
officinalis, Jun. 1935, Raabe, B 70-6670; Bayern, Freising, on leaves of
P. officinalis, Sep. 1918, Prof. Dr. J.E. Weiß, Herbarium
pathologicum, B 70-6663; Brandenburg, Schloßpark zu Tamsel, on leaves of
P. officinalis, 15 Aug. 1924, P. Vogel, Sydow, Mycoth. Germ. 2447,
M-57751, PH; Triglitz, on leaves of P. officinalis, 3 Oct. 1909,
Jaap, B 70-6668; Hessen, Frankfurt am Main, botanical garden, on leaves of
P. potaninii, 7 Oct. 2004, R. Kirschner, HAL, RoKi 2222; Kreis
Kassel, Hofgeismar, Garten von Prof. Grupe, on leaves of P.
officinalis, 3 Sep. 1947, Schulz, B 70-6658; Mecklenburg-Vorpommern,
Rostock, neuer botanischer Garten, on leaves of P. corallina (=
P. mascula), 27 Aug. 1950, Becker, B 70-6662; Nordrhein-Westfalen,
Duisburg, Dinslake, private garden, on leaves of P. anomala, 9 Aug.
2005, N. Ale-Agha, HAL 2014 F; Hamborn, botanical garden, on leaves of P.
obovata, 10 Aug. 2005, N. Ale-Agha, HAL 2017 F; Essen, botanical garden
of the university of Essen, on leaves of P. mlokosewitschii, 10 Aug.
2005, N. Ale-Agha, HAL 2013 F; on leaves of P. officinalis and P.
suffruticosa, 11 Aug. 2005, N. Ale-Agha, HAL 2016, 2017 F; Sachsen,
Königstein, in Gärten, verbreitet, on leaves of P.
officinalis, Aug. 1896, W. Krieger, Krieger, Fungi Saxon. Exs. 1545,
M-57749; Aug., Sep. 1896, 1915, W. Krieger, Krieger, Schädliche Pilze, B
70-6666, 70-6667; Sachsen-Anhalt, Halle (Saale), Botanical Garden, on leaves
of P. delavayi, 22 Jun. 2004, K. Schubert, HAL 2011 F, culture
deposited at the CBS, CBS
121522 = CPC 11383; on leaves of P. officinalis, 22 Jun.
2004, K. Schubert, HAL 2012 F; on stems of P. officinalis, 16 Mar.
2005, K. Schubert, neotype of HAL 1924 F, isoneotype
CBS-H 19869, culture
ex-neotype CBS
121523 = CPC 11969; on dead stems of Paeonia sp., Jan.
1873, G. Winter, Rabenhorst, Fungi Eur. Exs. 1661, HBG, as
“Periconia chlorocephala”; Thüringen,
Fürstlicher Park zu Sondershausen, on leaves of P. arborea, 20
Aug. 1903, G. Oertel, Sydow, Mycoth. Germ. 196, PH. Italy, Thümen,
Herb. Mycol. Oecon. 416, on living leaves of Paeonia lactiflora [=
P. edulis] (M-57753), lectotype of ; isolectotypes: Thümen,
Herb. Mycol. Oecon. 416; Padova, on leaves of P. officinalis, Aug.
1902, P.A. Saccardo, Saccardo, Mycoth. Ital. 1186, B 70-6660, SIENA; Parma, on
leaves of P. officinalis, Jul. 1876, Prof. Passerini, Thümen,
Mycoth. Univ. 670, B 70-6654, 70-6655, M-57752; Pavia, botanical garden, on
leaves of P. officinalis, summer 1889, Briosi & Cavara, Fung.
Paras. Piante Colt. Utili Ess. 78, M-57748; F. Cavara, Roumeguère,
Fungi Sel. Gall. Exs. 5193, mixed infection with Cladosporium
herbarum, B 70-6656; Siena, Hort. Bot., on leaves of Paeonia
sp., Nov. 1899, SIENA. Latvia, prov. Vidzeme, Kreis Riga, Riga, in a
garden, on leaves of P. foemina [= P. officinalis], 28 Aug.
1936, J. Smarods, Fungi Lat. Exs. 799, M-57747. New Zealand, isolated
from red leaf and stem lesions on Paeonia sp., M. Braithwaite,
CBS 100405.
Romania, Râmnicu-Vâlcea, distr. Vâlcea, Oltenia, on
leaves of P. officinalis, 17 Aug. 1930, Tr. Săvulescu & C.
Sandu, Săvulescu, Herb. Mycol. Roman. 298, M-57742. U.K.,
England, Cornwall, Lambounce Hill, Perranzubuloe, isolated from dead stems of
Paeonia sp., isol. F. Rilstone,
CBS 213.73 = IMI
048108a. U.S.A., on leaves of Paeonia sp., Sep. 1878, Ellis,
N. Amer. Fungi 543, B 70-6659, M-57744, PH; Illinois, Cobden, on leaves of
Paeonia sp., 8 Aug. 1882, F.S. Earle, No. 91, B 70-6657; Kansas,
Topeka, on leaves of P. officinalis, 7 Jul. 1922, C.F. Menninger, US
Dept. Agric., Pathol. Mycol. Coll. 60085, B 70-6661, F; Montana, Columbia, on
leaves of P. officinalis, Aug. 1886, B.T. Galloway, Ellis &
Everh., N. Amer. Fungi Ser. II, 1991, PH; on leaves of Paeonia sp.,
18 Oct. 1931, W.E. Maneval, F.Host range and distribution: On Paeonia anomala, P. arborea,
P. delavayi, P. hybrida, P. lactiflora, P. mascula, P. mlokosewitschii, P.
moutan, P. obovata, P. obovata var. willmotiae, P. officinalis, P.
potaninii, P. suffruticosa, Paeonia spp. (Paeoniaceae), Asia
(Armenia, China, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Russia), Europe (Belgium,
Czechoslovakia, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Moldova, Poland,
Romania, Switzerland, U.K., Ukraine), North America (Canada, U.S.A.), New
Zealand.Dichocladosporium chlorocephalum
(CBS 121522 = CPC
11383). A-B. Symptoms on leaves of Paeonia officinalis and P.
delavayi caused by the cladosporioid, leaf spotting morph. C-D.
Conidiophores and conidia. E. Ramoconidia and conidia. F-G. Scanning electron
microscopic photographs. F. Conidial chain still attached to a conidiophore.
G. Conidia showing surface ornamentation and scar structure. Scale bars: C-E,
G = 10 μm; F = 5 μm.Notes: Type material of Periconia chlorocephala is not
preserved in the herbarium of G. Fresenius at FR (Forschungsinstitut
Senkenberg, Frankfurt a. M., Germany). Hence, a new specimen collected in the
Botanical Garden of the Martin-Luther-University Halle (Saale), Germany, is
proposed to serve as neotype. A culture derived from this collection is
deposited at the CBS, Utrecht, the Netherlands as ex-neotype culture. A
leaf-blotch sample, also collected in the Botanical Garden at Halle (Saale),
from which we also derived a living culture, is designated as representative
of the synanamorph, Cladosporium paeoniae. Both cultures have been
used to generate DNA sequence data.The two stages (morphs) of this fungus are usually ecologically and
seasonally separated, but sometimes conidiophores of the leaf-blotching
(cladosporioid) morph also occur on dead stems of peony intermixed with the
macronematous conidiophores of the periconioid morph. In culture conidiophore
and conidial width tends to be narrower than on the natural substratum, and
the conidia are not as frequently septate.
DISCUSSION
Cultural studies by ourselves and McKemy & Morgan-Jones
(1991), and molecular sequence
analyses documented herein clearly demonstrate that Cladosporium
chlorocephalum, occurring on necrotic stems, and C. paeoniae,
causing leaf-blotch symptoms on living leaves of Paeonia spp., are
two synanamorphs of a single species, which has to be excluded from
Cladosporium s. str. since the conidiogenous loci are quite distinct
from the characteristically coronate scars in the latter genus and because ITS
sequences indicate clear separation from Cladosporium s. str.Analysis of the morphology and conidiogenesis showed that the macronematous
stage of this fungus (C. chlorocephalum, the periconioid morph)
closely resembles Metulocladosporiella, recently introduced for the
Cladosporium speckle disease of banana. There are, however, some differences.
In Metulocladosporiella musae (E.W. Mason) Crous et al., the
type species, micronematous conidiophores occur in vitro and in
vivo, and macronematous conidiophores occur on leaf-spots, whereas in
C. chlorocephalum the semi-macronematous conidiophores usually
accompany leaf-blotch symptoms on living leaves and the macronematous
conidiophores occur in saprobic growth on old necrotic stems. Rhizoid hyphae
arising from the swollen basal cells of the macronematous conidiophores are
characteristic for M. musae, but lacking in C.
chlorocephalum, and the conidia in the latter species are 0-5-septate,
but only 0(-1)-septate in M. musae. The semimacronematous,
leaf-blotching stage (the cladosporioid morph) is barely distinguishable from
the present concept of Fusicladium, which includes species with
catenate conidia (Schubert ). However, the peony fungus does not cluster within the
Venturiaceae. Since C. chlorocephalum clusters apart of the
Chaetothyriales, the clade to which Metulocladosporiella
belongs, the differences observed here seem to be sufficient to place this
fungus in a new genus (also see Crous
- this volume). Crous et al.
(2006a) discussed differences
between Metulocladosporiella and allied dematiaceous hyphomycete
genera and provided a key to the latter genus and morphologically similar
genera. Using this key, attempts to determine the macronematous morph of
Cladosporium chlorocephalum lead to Metulocladosporiella.
Differences between morphologically similar genera have been discussed in the
paper by Crous et al.
(2006a) and are also valid for
the new genus Dichocladosporium. Parapericoniella U. Braun, Heuchert
& K. Schub., a fungicolous genus recently introduced to accommodate
Cladosporium asterinae Deighton, is also morphologically similar in
having apically, densely branched conidiophores and truncate, unthickened
conidiogenous loci and hila, but is quite distinct in not having micronematous
conidiophores (Heuchert ).
Authors: Pedro W Crous; Bernard Slippers; Michael J Wingfield; John Rheeder; Walter F O Marasas; Alan J L Philips; Artur Alves; Treena Burgess; Paul Barber; Johannes Z Groenewald Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2006 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: K Bensch; J Z Groenewald; J Dijksterhuis; M Starink-Willemse; B Andersen; B A Summerell; H-D Shin; F M Dugan; H-J Schroers; U Braun; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2010 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: K Bensch; J Z Groenewald; M Meijer; J Dijksterhuis; Ž Jurjević; B Andersen; J Houbraken; P W Crous; R A Samson Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: K Bensch; J Z Groenewald; U Braun; J Dijksterhuis; M de Jesús Yáñez-Morales; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 16.097