Literature DB >> 18489204

Biases in interpretation and memory in generalized social phobia.

Paula T Hertel1, Faith Brozovich2, Jutta Joormann2, Ian H Gotlib2.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the link between interpretation and memory in individuals diagnosed with Generalized Social Phobia (GSP). In Experiment 1, GSP and control participants generated continuations for nonsocial and ambiguous social scenarios. GSP participants produced more socially anxious and negative continuations for the social scenarios than did the controls. On the subsequent test of recalling the social scenarios, intrusion errors that shared meaning with the original continuations were made more frequently by the GSP group, producing false recall with emotionally negative features. To examine whether nonanxious individuals would also produce such errors if given emotional interpretations, in Experiment 2 the authors asked university students to read the scenarios plus endings produced by GSP participants in Experiment 1. The students either constructed vivid mental images of themselves as the main characters or thought about whether the endings provided closure. Low-anxious students in the closure condition produced fewer ending-based intrusions in recalling the social scenarios than did students in the other 3 conditions. Results illustrate the importance of examining the nature of source-monitoring errors in investigations of memory biases in social anxiety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18489204     DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol        ISSN: 0021-843X


  10 in total

1.  Capturing the biases of socially anxious people by addressing partner effects and situational parameters.

Authors:  Todd B Kashdan; Antonina A Savostyanova
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2011-01-18

2.  Paths to positivity: the relationship of age differences in appraisals of control to emotional experience.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Young; Joseph A Mikels
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2019-12-06

3.  Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation in Major Depression: Effects on Memory and Stress Reactivity.

Authors:  Jutta Joormann; Christian E Waugh; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-01-01

4.  The interpretative lenses of older adults are not rose-colored--just less dark: Aging and the interpretation of ambiguous scenarios.

Authors:  Joseph A Mikels; Michael M Shuster
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2015-08-31

5.  Interpretation training influences memory for prior interpretations.

Authors:  Elske Salemink; Paula Hertel; Bundy Mackintosh
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-12

6.  Effects of standard and explicit cognitive bias modification and computer-administered cognitive-behaviour therapy on cognitive biases and social anxiety.

Authors:  Sirous Mobini; Bundy Mackintosh; Jo Illingworth; Lina Gega; Peter Langdon; Laura Hoppitt
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12-31

7.  The Role of Self-reports and Behavioral Measures of Interpretation Biases in Children with Varying Levels of Anxiety.

Authors:  Anke M Klein; Emmelie Flokstra; Rianne van Niekerk; Steven Klein; Ronald M Rapee; Jennifer L Hudson; Susan M Bögels; Eni S Becker; Mike Rinck
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2018-12

8.  Content-Specific Interpretation Bias in Children with Varying Levels of Anxiety: The Role of Gender and Age.

Authors:  Lynn Mobach; Mike Rinck; Eni S Becker; Jennifer L Hudson; Anke M Klein
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2019-10

9.  Appraisal-based cognitive bias modification in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Rianne A de Kleine; Marcella L Woud; Hannah Ferentzi; Gert-Jan Hendriks; Theo G Broekman; Eni S Becker; Agnes Van Minnen
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2019-07-08

10.  Memory cueing during sleep modifies the interpretation of ambiguous scenes in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Sabine Groch; Dana McMakin; Patrick Guggenbühl; Björn Rasch; Reto Huber; Ines Wilhelm
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 6.464

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.