AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Reduced oxidative capacity of the mitochondria in skeletal muscle has been suggested to contribute to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Moreover, a set of genes influencing oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) is downregulated in diabetic muscle. Here we studied whether genetic, epigenetic and non-genetic factors influence a component of the respiratory chain, COX7A1, previously shown to be downregulated in skeletal muscle from patients with type 2 diabetes. The specific aims were to: (1) evaluate the impact of genetic (single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]), epigenetic (DNA methylation) and non-genetic (age) factors on the expression of COX7A1 in human skeletal muscle; and (2) investigate whether common variants in the COX7A1 gene are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes. METHODS: COX7A1 mRNA expression was analysed in muscle biopsies from young (n = 110) and elderly (n = 86) non-diabetic twins and related to measures of in vivo metabolism. Genetic variants (three SNPs) from the COX7A1 locus were genotyped in the twins and in two independent type 2 diabetes case-control cohorts (n = 1466 and 6380, respectively). DNA methylation of the COX7A1 promoter was analysed in a subset of twins (ten young, ten elderly) using bisulphite sequencing. RESULTS: While DNA methylation of the COX7A1 promoter was increased in muscle from elderly compared with young twins (19.9 +/- 8.3% vs 1.8 +/- 2.7%; p = 0.035), the opposite was found for COX7A1 mRNA expression (elderly 1.00 +/- 0.05 vs young 1.68 +/- 0.06; p = 0.0005). The heritability of COX7A1 expression was estimated to be 50% in young and 72% in elderly twins. One of the polymorphisms investigated, rs753420, influenced basal COX7A1 expression in muscle of young (p = 0.0001) but not of elderly twins. The transcript level of COX7A1 was associated with increased in vivo glucose uptake and VO(2max) (p = 0.009 and p = 0.001, respectively). We did not observe any genetic association between COX7A1 polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes after correcting for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Our results provide further evidence for age as a factor influencing DNA methylation and expression of OXPHOS genes, and thereby in vivo metabolism.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Reduced oxidative capacity of the mitochondria in skeletal muscle has been suggested to contribute to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Moreover, a set of genes influencing oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) is downregulated in diabetic muscle. Here we studied whether genetic, epigenetic and non-genetic factors influence a component of the respiratory chain, COX7A1, previously shown to be downregulated in skeletal muscle from patients with type 2 diabetes. The specific aims were to: (1) evaluate the impact of genetic (single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]), epigenetic (DNA methylation) and non-genetic (age) factors on the expression of COX7A1 in human skeletal muscle; and (2) investigate whether common variants in the COX7A1 gene are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes. METHODS:COX7A1 mRNA expression was analysed in muscle biopsies from young (n = 110) and elderly (n = 86) non-diabetic twins and related to measures of in vivo metabolism. Genetic variants (three SNPs) from the COX7A1 locus were genotyped in the twins and in two independent type 2 diabetes case-control cohorts (n = 1466 and 6380, respectively). DNA methylation of the COX7A1 promoter was analysed in a subset of twins (ten young, ten elderly) using bisulphite sequencing. RESULTS: While DNA methylation of the COX7A1 promoter was increased in muscle from elderly compared with young twins (19.9 +/- 8.3% vs 1.8 +/- 2.7%; p = 0.035), the opposite was found for COX7A1 mRNA expression (elderly 1.00 +/- 0.05 vs young 1.68 +/- 0.06; p = 0.0005). The heritability of COX7A1 expression was estimated to be 50% in young and 72% in elderly twins. One of the polymorphisms investigated, rs753420, influenced basal COX7A1 expression in muscle of young (p = 0.0001) but not of elderly twins. The transcript level of COX7A1 was associated with increased in vivo glucose uptake and VO(2max) (p = 0.009 and p = 0.001, respectively). We did not observe any genetic association between COX7A1 polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes after correcting for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Our results provide further evidence for age as a factor influencing DNA methylation and expression of OXPHOS genes, and thereby in vivo metabolism.
Authors: E Arnaudo; M Hirano; R S Seelan; A Milatovich; C L Hsieh; G M Fabrizi; L I Grossman; U Francke; E A Schon Journal: Gene Date: 1992-10-01 Impact factor: 3.688
Authors: Clinton R Bruce; Mitchell J Anderson; Andrew L Carey; David G Newman; Arend Bonen; Adamandia D Kriketos; Gregory J Cooney; John A Hawley Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Florian Eckhardt; Joern Lewin; Rene Cortese; Vardhman K Rakyan; John Attwood; Matthias Burger; John Burton; Tony V Cox; Rob Davies; Thomas A Down; Carolina Haefliger; Roger Horton; Kevin Howe; David K Jackson; Jan Kunde; Christoph Koenig; Jennifer Liddle; David Niblett; Thomas Otto; Roger Pettett; Stefanie Seemann; Christian Thompson; Tony West; Jane Rogers; Alex Olek; Kurt Berlin; Stephan Beck Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2006-10-29 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: David A Nielsen; Sara Hamon; Vadim Yuferov; Colin Jackson; Ann Ho; Jurg Ott; Mary Jeanne Kreek Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Z Hochberg; R Feil; M Constancia; M Fraga; C Junien; J-C Carel; P Boileau; Y Le Bouc; C L Deal; K Lillycrop; R Scharfmann; A Sheppard; M Skinner; M Szyf; R A Waterland; D J Waxman; E Whitelaw; K Ong; K Albertsson-Wikland Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2010-10-22 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Scott M Langevin; E Andres Houseman; Brock C Christensen; John K Wiencke; Heather H Nelson; Margaret R Karagas; Carmen J Marsit; Karl T Kelsey Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Hye Jin Hwang; Scott G Lynn; Ajith Vengellur; Yogesh Saini; Elizabeth A Grier; Shelagh M Ferguson-Miller; John J LaPres Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Tina Rönn; Pernille Poulsen; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Bo Isomaa; Leif Groop; Allan Vaag; Charlotte Ling Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240