CONTEXT: Career satisfaction among physicians is a topic of importance to physicians in practice, physicians in training, health system administrators, physician organization executives, and consumers. The level of career satisfaction derived by physicians from their work is a basic yet essential element in the functioning of the health care system. OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which professional autonomy, compensation, and managed care are determinants of career satisfaction among physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using data from 1996-97 Community Tracking Study physician telephone survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of 12,385 direct patient care physicians. The survey response rate was 65%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall career satisfaction among U.S. physicians. RESULTS: Bivariate results show that physicians with low managed care revenues are significantly more likely to be "very satisfied" than are physicians with high managed care revenue (P < .05), and that physicians with low managed care revenues are significantly more likely to report higher levels of clinical freedom than are physicians with high managed care revenue (P < .05). Multivariate analyses demonstrate that, among our measures, traditional core professional values and autonomy are the most important determinants of career satisfaction after controlling for all other factors. Relative income is also an important independent predictor. Multiple dimensions of professional autonomy hold up as strong, independent predictors of career satisfaction, while the effect of managed care does not. Managed care appears to exert its effect on satisfaction through its impact on professional autonomy, not through income reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that when managed care (or other influences) erode professional autonomy, the result is a highly negative impact on physician career satisfaction.
CONTEXT: Career satisfaction among physicians is a topic of importance to physicians in practice, physicians in training, health system administrators, physician organization executives, and consumers. The level of career satisfaction derived by physicians from their work is a basic yet essential element in the functioning of the health care system. OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which professional autonomy, compensation, and managed care are determinants of career satisfaction among physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using data from 1996-97 Community Tracking Study physician telephone survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of 12,385 direct patient care physicians. The survey response rate was 65%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall career satisfaction among U.S. physicians. RESULTS: Bivariate results show that physicians with low managed care revenues are significantly more likely to be "very satisfied" than are physicians with high managed care revenue (P < .05), and that physicians with low managed care revenues are significantly more likely to report higher levels of clinical freedom than are physicians with high managed care revenue (P < .05). Multivariate analyses demonstrate that, among our measures, traditional core professional values and autonomy are the most important determinants of career satisfaction after controlling for all other factors. Relative income is also an important independent predictor. Multiple dimensions of professional autonomy hold up as strong, independent predictors of career satisfaction, while the effect of managed care does not. Managed care appears to exert its effect on satisfaction through its impact on professional autonomy, not through income reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that when managed care (or other influences) erode professional autonomy, the result is a highly negative impact on physician career satisfaction.
Authors: P Kemper; D Blumenthal; J M Corrigan; P J Cunningham; S M Felt; J M Grossman; L T Kohn; C E Metcalf; R F St Peter; R C Strouse; P B Ginsburg Journal: Inquiry Date: 1996 Impact factor: 1.730
Authors: K Donelan; R J Blendon; G D Lundberg; D R Calkins; J P Newhouse; L L Leape; D K Remler; H Taylor Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 1997 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: M R DiMatteo; C D Sherbourne; R D Hays; L Ordway; R L Kravitz; E A McGlynn; S Kaplan; W H Rogers Journal: Health Psychol Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Vineet Arora; Tosha B Wetterneck; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Andrew D Auerbach; Peter Kaboli; Robert M Wachter; Wendy Levinson; Holly J Humphrey; David Meltzer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Christine A Sinsky; Rachel Willard-Grace; Andrew M Schutzbank; Thomas A Sinsky; David Margolius; Thomas Bodenheimer Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166