Literature DB >> 18485300

Gain- and loss-of-function approaches in the chick embryo.

Tatjana Sauka-Spengler1, Meyer Barembaum.   

Abstract

The chicken embryo has been used as a classical embryological model for studying developmental events because of its ready availability, similarity to the human embryos, and amenability to embryological and surgical manipulations. With the arrival of the molecular era, however, avian embryos presented distinct experimental limitations, largely because of the difficulty of performing targeted mutagenesis or transgenic studies. However, in the last decade and a half, a number of new methods for transient transgenesis have been developed that allow efficient alteration of gene function during early embryonic development. These techniques have made it possible to study the effects of gene inactivation or overexpression on downstream transcriptional regulation as well as on embryonic derivatives. This, together with sequencing of the chicken genome, has allowed the chicken embryo to enter the genomic era. While attempts to establish germ line transgenesis are ongoing, methods for rapid, transient spatiotemporally targeted gene alterations have thus again re-established the chick embryo as an important experimental niche by making it possible to apply genetics in concert with classical embryological techniques. This provides a unique tool to explore the role of developmentally important genes (Ishii and Mikawa, 2005; Itasaki et al., 1999; Krull, 2004; Ogura, 2002; Swartz et al., 2001). Transient transfection methods have allowed for efficient mis- and overexpression of transgenes. For long-term analyses, retrovirally mediated gene transfer has particular advantage. For short-term experiments, electroporation and adenoviral-mediated gene transfer methods provide transient expression, largely because of the short persistence time of the transgene within the cell. More recently, Tol2 transposon-mediated constructs have been employed, allowing for integration into the genome and prolonged expression of the transgene (Sato et al., 2007), see Chapter 14 by Takahashi et al., this volume). These methods today are routinely used for gain-of-function analysis, to overexpress or ectopically express genes of interest (Arber et al., 1999; Barembaum and Bronner-Fraser, 2007; Bel-Vialar et al., 2002). Loss-of-function experiments are also possible using electroporation of dominant-negative constructs that act as competitive inhibitors (Bel-Vialar et al., 2002; Renzi et al., 2000; Suzuki-Hirano et al., 2005), morpholino antisense oligos (Basch et al., 2006; Kos et al., 2001; Sheng et al., 2003) that block translation or splicing, or constructs expressing small interfering or small hairpin RNAs (siRNAs or shRNAs) (Chesnutt and Niswander, 2004; Das et al., 2006; Katahira and Nakamura, 2003). Electroporation as the most popular method of the transient transfection into the chick embryos. Electroporation of chicken embryos involves application of an electric field to the exposed tissue that transiently disrupts the stability of the cell plasma membrane, creating reversible pores through which nucleic acids or their analogues can be readily transported into the cytosol. The use of this method for transfection into the vertebrate embryos has been facilitated by adapting the voltage parameters and the type and the duration of the electric pulse. By applying several successive square pulses at a very low voltage, with long rest periods in between, one can successfully deliver a DNA construct or another small charged particle into the cytoplasm, with minimal cell death, high efficiency of the uptake and good embryonic survival rate. The size limit of the DNA molecule that can be transfected in such a way is not yet known, though it is more likely that the size limitation in this procedure (if any) lies within the practical problems of cloning large fragments into the plasmid. We routinely overexpress constructs containing 3-4 kb inserts and coharboring a GFP or RFP reporter whose translation is initiated from an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES), thus allowing easy detection of the electroporated cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18485300     DOI: 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)00212-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Cell Biol        ISSN: 0091-679X            Impact factor:   1.441


  71 in total

Review 1.  Avian models in teratology and developmental toxicology.

Authors:  Susan M Smith; George R Flentke; Ana Garic
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

2.  Ancestral network module regulating prdm1 expression in the lamprey neural plate border.

Authors:  Natalya Nikitina; Leslie Tong; Marianne E Bronner
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.780

3.  The tight junction protein claudin-1 influences cranial neural crest cell emigration.

Authors:  Katherine J Fishwick; Theresa E Neiderer; Sharon Jhingory; Marianne E Bronner; Lisa A Taneyhill
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 1.882

4.  A simple technique for early in vivo electroporation of E1 chick embryos.

Authors:  Charmaine Y Brown; Dae Seok Eom; Smita Amarnath; Seema Agarwala
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 5.  Genetic model system studies of the development of the enteric nervous system, gut motility and Hirschsprung's disease.

Authors:  G Burzynski; I T Shepherd; H Enomoto
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 6.  Review: the role of neural crest cells in the endocrine system.

Authors:  Meghan Sara Adams; Marianne Bronner-Fraser
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 7.  The role of vertebrate models in understanding craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Greg Holmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Genomic code for Sox10 activation reveals a key regulatory enhancer for cranial neural crest.

Authors:  Paola Betancur; Marianne Bronner-Fraser; Tatjana Sauka-Spengler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Stage-dependent plasticity of the anterior neural folds to form neural crest.

Authors:  Maxellende Ezin; Meyer Barembaum; Marianne E Bronner
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.880

10.  RNA-Seq analysis of differential gene expression in electroporated chick embryonic spinal cord.

Authors:  Felipe M Vieceli; C Y Irene Yan
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.