Literature DB >> 18484975

Challenges, benefits and weaknesses of intermediate care: results from five UK case study sites.

Emma Regen1, Graham Martin, Jon Glasby, Graham Hewitt, Susan Nancarrow, Hilda Parker.   

Abstract

The authors explore the views of practitioners and managers on the implementation of intermediate care for elderly people across England, including their perceptions of the challenges involved in its implementation, and their assessment of the main benefits and weaknesses of provision. Qualitative data were collected in five case study sites (English primary care trusts) via semistructured interviews (n = 61) and focus group discussions (n = 21) during 2003 to 2004. Interviewees included senior managers, intermediate care service managers, clinicians and health and social care staff involved in the delivery of intermediate care. The data were analysed thematically using an approach based on the 'framework' method. Workforce and funding shortages, poor joint working between health and social care agencies and lack of support/involvement on the part of the medical profession were identified as the main challenges to developing intermediate care. The perceived benefits of intermediate care for service-users included flexibility, patient centredness and the promotion of independence. The 'home-like' environment in which services were delivered was contrasted favourably with hospitals. Multidisciplinary teamworking and opportunities for role flexibility were identified as key benefits by staff. Insufficient capacity, problems of access and awareness at the interface between intermediate care and 'mainstream' services combined with poor co-ordination between intermediate care services emerged as the main weaknesses in current provision. Despite reported benefits for service-users and staff, the study indicates that intermediate care does not appear to be achieving its full potential for alleviating pressure within health and social care systems. The strengthening of capacity and workforce, improvements to whole systems working and the promotion of intermediate care among doctors and other referrers were identified as key future priorities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484975     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00788.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  7 in total

1.  Improved outcomes for elderly patients who received care on a transitional care unit.

Authors:  Margaret Manville; Michael C Klein; Lesley Bainbridge
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Effectiveness of an intermediate care hospital on readmissions, mortality, activities of daily living and use of health care services among hospitalized adults aged 60 years and older--a controlled observational study.

Authors:  Unni Dahl; Aslak Steinsbekk; Roar Johnsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  "It's very complicated": a qualitative study of medicines management in intermediate care facilities in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  Anna N Millar; Carmel M Hughes; Cristín Ryan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Hospital discharge of elderly patients to primary health care, with and without an intermediate care hospital - a qualitative study of health professionals' experiences.

Authors:  Unni Dahl; Aslak Steinsbekk; Svanhild Jenssen; Roar Johnsen
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.120

5.  Health-care professionals' experiences of patient participation among older patients in intermediate care-At the intersection between profession, market and bureaucracy.

Authors:  Linda Aimée Hartford Kvael; Jonas Debesay; Asta Bye; Astrid Bergland
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Impact of 'Enhanced' Intermediate Care Integrating Acute, Primary and Community Care and the Voluntary Sector in Torbay and South Devon, UK.

Authors:  Julian Elston; Felix Gradinger; Sheena Asthana; Matthew Fox; Louise Dawson; Dawn Butler; Richard Byng
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  The role of an intermediate unit in a clinical pathway.

Authors:  Anne-Kari Johannessen; Hilde Lurås; Sissel Steihaug
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 5.120

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.