Literature DB >> 18484852

Evidence against the temporal subsampling account of illusory motion reversal.

Keith A Kline1, David M Eagleman.   

Abstract

An illusion of reversed motion may occur sporadically while viewing continuous smooth motion. This has been suggested as evidence of discrete temporal sampling by the visual system in analogy to the sampling that generates the wagon-wheel effect on film (D. Purves, J. A. Paydarfar, & T. J. Andrews, 1996; R. VanRullen, L. Reddy, & C. Koch, 2005). In an alternative theory, the illusion is not the result of discrete sampling but instead of perceptual rivalry between appropriately activated and spuriously activated motion detectors (K. A. Kline, A. O. Holcombe, & D. M. Eagleman, 2004, 2006). Results of the current study demonstrate that illusory reversals of two spatially overlapping and orthogonal motions often occur separately, providing evidence against the possibility that illusory motion reversal (IMR) is caused by temporal sampling within a visual region. Further, we find that IMR occurs with non-uniform and non-periodic stimuli-an observation that is not accounted for by the temporal sampling hypothesis. We propose, that a motion aftereffect is superimposed on the moving stimulus, sporadically allowing motion detectors for the reverse direction to dominate perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484852      PMCID: PMC2856842          DOI: 10.1167/8.4.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  13 in total

Review 1.  A framework for consciousness.

Authors:  Francis Crick; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Illusory percepts of moving patterns due to discrete temporal sampling.

Authors:  William A Simpson; Uma Shahani; Velitchko Manahilov
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Illusory motion reversal in tune with motion detectors.

Authors:  Alex O Holcombe; Colin W G Clifford; David M Eagleman; Pooya Pakarian
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Do discreteness and rivalry coexist in illusory motion reversals?

Authors:  Daniel Rojas; Carlos Carmona-Fontaine; Javier López-Calderón; Francisco Aboitiz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The wagon-wheel illusion in continuous light.

Authors:  Tim Andrews; Dale Purves
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion is object-based.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Attention-driven discrete sampling of motion perception.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen; Leila Reddy; Christof Koch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion depends on, but is not identical to neuronal adaptation.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Temporal events in cyclopean vision.

Authors:  T J Andrews; L E White; D Binder; D Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality.

Authors:  D Purves; J A Paydarfar; T J Andrews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  10 in total

1.  Neural correlates of the continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion: a functional MRI study.

Authors:  Leila Reddy; Florence Rémy; Nathalie Vayssière; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Beta oscillations define discrete perceptual cycles in the somatosensory domain.

Authors:  Thomas J Baumgarten; Alfons Schnitzler; Joachim Lange
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Wagon Wheel Illusions and models of orientation selection.

Authors:  Patrick Martineau
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 4.  On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen; Benedikt Zoefel; Barkin Ilhan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Consciousness: a unique way of processing information.

Authors:  Giorgio Marchetti
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-02-08

6.  Ongoing EEG Phase as a Trial-by-Trial Predictor of Perceptual and Attentional Variability.

Authors:  R Vanrullen; N A Busch; J Drewes; Julien Dubois
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-09

7.  The psychophysics of brain rhythms.

Authors:  Rufin Vanrullen; Julien Dubois
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-08-27

8.  Attention in natural scenes: contrast affects rapid visual processing and fixations alike.

Authors:  Bernard Marius 't Hart; Hannah Claudia Elfriede Fanny Schmidt; Ingo Klein-Harmeyer; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Subliminal stimuli modulate somatosensory perception rhythmically and provide evidence for discrete perception.

Authors:  Thomas J Baumgarten; Sara Königs; Alfons Schnitzler; Joachim Lange
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Physical Time Within Human Time.

Authors:  Ronald P Gruber; Richard A Block; Carlos Montemayor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.