Literature DB >> 17005233

The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion is object-based.

Rufin VanRullen1.   

Abstract

The occurrence of perceived reversed motion while observers view a periodic, continuously moving stimulus (the "continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion") has been taken as evidence that some aspects of motion perception rely on discrete sampling of visual information. The spatial extent of this sampling is currently under debate. When two separate motion stimuli are viewed simultaneously, the illusion of reversed motion rarely occurs for both objects together: this rules out global sampling of the visual field. The same result holds when the objects are superimposed by transparency: this argues against location-based sampling. Here we show that the sampling is in fact object-based: we use a rotating ring stimulus split in two halves. When the two halves move in opposite directions, appearing to belong to separate objects, perceptual reversals occur in either half at a time, but rarely in both. When the two halves physically move in compatible directions, they generally appear to reverse simultaneously: the illusion keeps the perceptual object united. Rather than the local low-level properties of the motion stimulus (which are comparable in both cases), it is thus the high-level organization of the scene that determines the extent of perceived motion reversals. These results imply that the continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion, and any discrete perceptual sampling that may cause it, is restricted to the object of our attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17005233     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Neural correlates of the continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion: a functional MRI study.

Authors:  Leila Reddy; Florence Rémy; Nathalie Vayssière; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Evidence against the temporal subsampling account of illusory motion reversal.

Authors:  Keith A Kline; David M Eagleman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen; Benedikt Zoefel; Barkin Ilhan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  The 'when' parietal pathway explored by lesion studies.

Authors:  Lorella Battelli; Vincent Walsh; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Seeing via Miniature Eye Movements: A Dynamic Hypothesis for Vision.

Authors:  Ehud Ahissar; Amos Arieli
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  The psychophysics of brain rhythms.

Authors:  Rufin Vanrullen; Julien Dubois
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-08-27

7.  The continuous Wagon wheel illusion and the 'when' pathway of the right parietal lobe: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.