Literature DB >> 18484849

Excitatory and inhibitory interaction fields of flankers revealed by contrast-masking functions.

Chien-Chung Chen1, Christopher W Tyler.   

Abstract

To study spatial interactions corresponding to the non-classical receptive field organization for human vision, we used a dual-masking paradigm to measure how target contrast discrimination can be affected by the relative location of the flankers. The observers' task was to detect a 4 cycle/deg vertical Gabor superimposed on a matching Gabor pedestal in the presence of vertical Gabor flankers. The flankers were either (i) collinear with the target and varying in distance or (ii) at a fixed distance from the target but with varying in location relative to the vertical axis. Compared with the no-flanker condition, the collinear flankers decreased target threshold at low pedestal contrasts (facilitation) and increased threshold at high contrasts (suppression). The low contrast facilitation increased with distance up to 4 wavelengths and decreased beyond that. Both facilitative and suppressive flanker effects were greatest at the collinear location and decreased monotonically as flanker location deviated from the collinear axis. These flanker effects are modeled with our sensitivity modulation model, which suggests that the flanker effects are multiplicative terms applied to both the excitatory and inhibitory terms of a divisive inhibition response function. The model parameters show that the facilitative flanker effect is narrowly tuned in space. The data are not compatible with a model of additive normalization by the pedestal contrast or with the uncertainty model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484849     DOI: 10.1167/8.4.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  17 in total

1.  Perceived contrast in complex images.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Lateral effects in pattern vision.

Authors:  John M Foley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  A preclinical cognitive test battery to parallel the National Institute of Health Toolbox in humans: bridging the translational gap.

Authors:  Shikha Snigdha; Norton W Milgram; Sherry L Willis; Marylin Albert; S Weintraub; Norbert J Fortin; Carl W Cotman
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Anisotropy in spatial summation properties of human Ocular-Following Response (OFR).

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; E J FitzGibbon; B G Cumming
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Psychometric functions for detection and discrimination with and without flankers.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Peeling plaids apart: context counteracts cross-orientation contrast masking.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Linking structure and function: development of lateral spatial interactions in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Da-Peng Li; Maureen A Hagan; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  What is visible across the visual field?

Authors:  Andrew M Haun
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2021-06-01

9.  Principles of perceptual grouping: implications for image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Birgitta Dresp-Langley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-20

10.  What is the primary cause of individual differences in contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Daniel H Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.