Literature DB >> 18483809

Characterization of methylphenidate self-administration and reinstatement in the rat.

Leigh C P Botly1, Christie L Burton, Zoë Rizos, Paul J Fletcher.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Methylphenidate, which is used to treat attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, increases extracellular dopamine by inhibiting the dopamine transporter. Methylphenidate has an abuse potential, and there are increasing reports of recreational use of methylphenidate. Little work has examined methylphenidate self-administration in rodent models.
OBJECTIVES: This work characterized intravenous methylphenidate self-administration in rats, determined whether dopamine mediates its reinforcing effects and examined the influence of route of administration on the ability of methylphenidate to reinstate extinguished drug-seeking behaviour.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were trained to self-administer methylphenidate (0.25 mg per infusion) via an intravenous catheter according to a fixed ratio 1 (FR1) or progressive ratio (PR) schedule. The effects of manipulating the dose of methylphenidate and of treatment with the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 or the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist eticlopride (both at 0.01 and 0.03 mg/kg) were examined. Finally, the ability of noncontingent administrations of methylphenidate (intraperitoneal [IP] or gavage) to reinstate extinguished drug-seeking behaviour was examined.
RESULTS: Rats readily self-administered methylphenidate dose dependently on FR1 and PR schedules. Treatment with SCH23390 or eticlopride increased the number methylphenidate infusions taken by rats on the FR1 schedule and reduced breaking points on the PR schedule. Following extinction of drug-seeking behaviour, methylphenidate reinstated responding and was more effective at doing so when administered IP.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that intravenous methylphenidate is a reinforcer and that its reinforcing efficacy is related to increased dopamine activity at D1 and D2 receptors. Methylphenidate reinstates drug-seeking behaviour; the route of administration modifies this response suggesting that pharmacokinetic factors are important in determining methylphenidate-induced reinstatement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18483809     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1093-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  90 in total

1.  Self-administration of CNS stimulants by dog.

Authors:  M E Risner; B E Jones
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1975-09-17

2.  Prediction of abuse liability of drugs using IV self-administration by rats.

Authors:  R J Collins; J R Weeks; M M Cooper; P I Good; R R Russell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Methylphenidate and cocaine have a similar in vivo potency to block dopamine transporters in the human brain.

Authors:  N D Volkow; G J Wang; J S Fowler; M Fischman; R Foltin; N N Abumrad; S J Gatley; J Logan; C Wong; A Gifford; Y S Ding; R Hitzemann; N Pappas
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.037

4.  Locomotor effects of acute and repeated threshold doses of amphetamine and methylphenidate: relative roles of dopamine and norepinephrine.

Authors:  R Kuczenski; D S Segal
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Methylphenidate: increased abuse or appropriate use?

Authors:  M E Llana; M L Crismon
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash)       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

6.  Sensitization to amphetamine, but not PCP, impairs attentional set shifting: reversal by a D1 receptor agonist injected into the medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Paul J Fletcher; Catherine C Tenn; Zoë Rizos; Vedran Lovic; Shitij Kapur
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Poison centers' experience with methylphenidate abuse in pre-teens and adolescents.

Authors:  Wendy Klein-Schwartz; Jean McGrath
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.829

8.  Cocaine-induced cocaine craving.

Authors:  J H Jaffe; N G Cascella; K M Kumor; M A Sherer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Is methylphenidate like cocaine? Studies on their pharmacokinetics and distribution in the human brain.

Authors:  N D Volkow; Y S Ding; J S Fowler; G J Wang; J Logan; J S Gatley; S Dewey; C Ashby; J Liebermann; R Hitzemann
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1995-06

Review 10.  Comparing the abuse potential of methylphenidate versus other stimulants: a review of available evidence and relevance to the ADHD patient.

Authors:  Scott H Kollins
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.384

View more
  21 in total

1.  The dopamine dilemma: using stimulants and antipsychotics concurrently.

Authors:  Jason Yanofski
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2010-06

Review 2.  Behavioral and neurobiological mechanisms of extinction in Pavlovian and instrumental learning.

Authors:  Travis P Todd; Drina Vurbic; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Oral methylphenidate establishes a conditioned place preference in rats.

Authors:  Thomas E Wooters; Matthew T Walton; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Strain differences in self-administration of methylphenidate and sucrose pellets in a rat model of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Julie A Marusich; William Travis McCuddy; Joshua S Beckmann; Cassandra D Gipson; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  The Dopamine Dilemma-Part II: Could Stimulants Cause Tolerance, Dependence, and Paradoxical Decompensation?

Authors:  Jason Yanofski
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-01

6.  The dopamine D2 antagonist eticlopride accelerates extinction and delays reacquisition of food self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Jonathon Koerber; David Goodman; Jesse L Barnes; Jeffrey W Grimm
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Methylphenidate as a reinforcer for rats: contingent delivery and intake escalation.

Authors:  Julie A Marusich; Joshua S Beckmann; Cassandra D Gipson; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  The effects of adolescent methylphenidate self-administration on responding for a conditioned reward, amphetamine-induced locomotor activity, and neuronal activation.

Authors:  Christie L Burton; José N Nobrega; Paul J Fletcher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Differences in impulsivity on a delay-discounting task predict self-administration of a low unit dose of methylphenidate in rats.

Authors:  Julie A Marusich; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  Environmental enrichment during development decreases intravenous self-administration of methylphenidate at low unit doses in rats.

Authors:  Kristin M Alvers; Julie A Marusich; Cassandra D Gipson; Joshua S Beckmann; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.