Literature DB >> 10403500

Methylphenidate and cocaine have a similar in vivo potency to block dopamine transporters in the human brain.

N D Volkow1, G J Wang, J S Fowler, M Fischman, R Foltin, N N Abumrad, S J Gatley, J Logan, C Wong, A Gifford, Y S Ding, R Hitzemann, N Pappas.   

Abstract

The reinforcing effects of cocaine and methylphenidate have been linked to their ability to block dopamine transporters (DAT). Though cocaine and methylphenidate have similar in vitro affinities for DAT the abuse of methylphenidate in humans is substantially lower than of cocaine. To test if differences in in vivo potency at the DAT between these two drugs could account for the differences in their abuse liability we compared the levels of DAT occupancies that we had previously reported separately for intravenous methylphenidate in controls and for intravenous cocaine in cocaine abusers. DAT occupancies were measured with Positron Emission Tomography using [11C]cocaine, as a DAT ligand, in 8 normal controls for the methylphenidate study and in 17 active cocaine abusers for the cocaine study. The ratio of the distribution volume of [11C]cocaine in striatum to that in cerebellum, which corresponds to Bmax/Kd +1, was used as measure of DAT availability. Parallel measures were obtained to assess the cardiovascular effects of these two drugs. Methylphenidate and cocaine produced comparable dose-dependent blockade of DAT with an estimated ED50 (dose required to block 50% of the DAT) for methylphenidate of 0.07 mg/kg and for cocaine of 0.13 mg/kg. Both drugs induced similar increases in heart rate and blood pressure but the duration of the effects were significantly longer for methylphenidate than for cocaine. The similar in vivo potencies at the DAT for methylphenidate than for cocaine are in agreement with their reported relative in vitro affinities (Ki 390 nM and 640 nM respectively), which is likely to reflect the similar degree of uptake (8-10% of the injected dose) and regional distribution of these two drugs in the human brain. Thus, differences in the in vivo potency of these two drugs at the DAT cannot be responsible for the differences in their rate of abuse in humans. Other variables i.e. longer duration of methylphenidate's side effects may counterbalance its reinforcing effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10403500     DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3205(99)00225-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life Sci        ISSN: 0024-3205            Impact factor:   5.037


  45 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts in pharmacotherapy of substance abuse.

Authors:  P C Gottschalk; L K Jacobsen; T R Kosten
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Adolescent rat circadian activity is modulated by psychostimulants.

Authors:  M Bergheim; P B Yang; K D Burau; N Dafny
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Neuroimaging in drug abuse.

Authors:  Kimberly P Lindsey; S John Gatley; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Smoking produces rapid rise of [11C]nicotine in human brain.

Authors:  Marc S Berridge; Scott M Apana; Kenichi K Nagano; Catherine E Berridge; Gregory P Leisure; Mark V Boswell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Agonist replacement therapy for cocaine dependence: a translational review.

Authors:  Craig R Rush; William W Stoops
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.808

6.  Acute and chronic methylphenidate alters prefrontal cortex neuronal activity recorded from freely behaving rats.

Authors:  R Layla Salek; Catherine M Claussen; Adriana Pérez; Nachum Dafny
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 7.  Metabolomics of Methylphenidate and Ethylphenidate: Implications in Pharmacological and Toxicological Effects.

Authors:  Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.441

8.  Acute and chronic methylphenidate dose-response assessment on three adolescent male rat strains.

Authors:  Pamela B Yang; Alan C Swann; Nachum Dafny
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Glutaminergic signaling in the caudate nucleus is required for behavioral sensitization to methylphenidate.

Authors:  Nicholas King; Samuel Floren; Natasha Kharas; Ming Thomas; Nachum Dafny
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Nucleus accumbens lesions modulate the effects of methylphenidate.

Authors:  Adam Podet; Min J Lee; Alan C Swann; Nachum Dafny
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.