An imaging method capable of using a signal from pancreatic beta cells to determine their mass would be of immense value in monitoring the progression of diabetes as well as response to treatment. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are expressed on beta cells and are a potential target for imaging. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether pancreatic beta cells are a target for radiolabeled naphthylalanine derivatives. The molecules were subjected to in vitro and ex vivo evaluations. Pancreatic uptake of radioactivity was lower in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice than normal mice at all time points investigated (P < .05) and correlated with the number of islets in tissue sections of both control and NOD mice. Immunohistochemical and confocal fluorescent microscopic studies showed colocalization of insulin and the conjugate radioligand in the pancreas. The results demonstrated that pancreatic uptake is receptor-mediated, and that beta cells are the primary target.
An imaging method capable of using a signal from pancreatic beta cells to determine their mass would be of immense value in monitoring the progression of diabetes as well as response to treatment. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are expressed on beta cells and are a potential target for imaging. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether pancreatic beta cells are a target for radiolabeled naphthylalanine derivatives. The molecules were subjected to in vitro and ex vivo evaluations. Pancreatic uptake of radioactivity was lower in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice than normal mice at all time points investigated (P < .05) and correlated with the number of islets in tissue sections of both control and NOD mice. Immunohistochemical and confocal fluorescent microscopic studies showed colocalization of insulin and the conjugate radioligand in the pancreas. The results demonstrated that pancreatic uptake is receptor-mediated, and that beta cells are the primary target.
Beta cell mass
(BCM) in the pancreas is a key factor in determining the amount of insulin
secreted to maintain normal blood glucose level. Currently, this information can
only be determined precisely at autopsy. Although BCM can be deduced from blood
measurements, it has not been shown to correlate well with the dysfunction of
beta cells that result from morphological and biochemical changes in the
pancreas [1]. Additionally,
there are no known noninvasive methods to differentiate between functional and
anatomical defects in insulin secretion.Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
(type-1, T1D) is characterized by an autoimmune process that leads to the
destruction of beta cells in individuals who are genetically predisposed to
the disease [2-5]. The occult phase of the disease involves infiltration of the
pancreas by mononuclear cells that begins long before the onset of the disease
and progressively decreases as the BCM declines [6-12]. Consequently, after substantial
loss of BCM and function, there is a need for therapeutic insulin replacement
(the overt symptomatic phase of diabetes). One of the characteristics of type 2
diabetes (T2D) is insulin resistance in a setting of inadequate compensatory
insulin secretory response. Additionally, several insulin production and
secretion abnormalities have been described in patients with T2D [13]. Current
treatment approaches for T2D include alterations in diet, commencement of an exercise
program, and a variety of drugs such as insulin, biguanides, sulphonylureas (SUs), and thiazolidinediones [6]. The success of any
interventional strategy may depend largely on a clear understanding of disease
progression. The lack of a technique that can measure or visualize pancreatic
beta cells noninvasively has left many unanswered questions regarding disease
progression. Progress has been made towards imaging the endocrine pancreas, and nuclear
imaging leads the way relative to other imaging modalities such as magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) and optical imaging [11]. Indium-111-oxine-labeled
autologous lymphocytes [12], interleukin-2 labeled with iodine-123 and technetium-99m [14-16], technetium-99m-labeled
human polyclonal immunoglobulins (Tc-99m-HIG) [17], and a specific antibody to
the islet antigen have been reported as potential endocrine pancreas imaging
agents [18].Modulation of insulin secretion by
antidiabetic secretagogues involves binding to high affinity sulphonylurea
receptors (SURs) expressed by beta cells. Hence, SU analogs have been radiolabeled with fluorine-18 and carbon-11 and
investigated as potential nuclear imaging agents. The results from these
studies were not satisfactory because of negligible pancreatic uptake of the
potential tracers [19-21]. Clark et al. imaged the pancreatic body with fluorine-18-benzyltrozamicol
[22]. This radioligand binds specifically to neuroreceptors present on presynaptic vesicles in neurons
innervating the pancreas. Simpson et al. recently reported imaging pancreatic
beta cells using [11C]dihydrotetrabenazine ([11C]-DTBZ),
a ligand that targets the vesicular monoamine transporter expressed on
pancreatic beta cells in rodent models and in baboons [23-25]. This is a promising radiotracer and was the
first of the kind to be evaluated in primates as far as we know. However, there
are other potential targets that needed to be investigated targeting the beta
cells.Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are expressed
in the endocrine pancreas, and five subtypes of human SSTRs (hSSTR1–hSSTR5) have been
cloned and characterized. These receptor subtypes bind endogenous SST-14 and
SST-28 with low nanomolar affinity. Reports on the selectivity of all five
subtypes for synthetic SST analogs have been controversial [26-29]. However, of
the known receptor subtypes, SSTR1 and SSTR5 have been colocalized to these cells
[30-35]. Although there is no direct evidence of association between BCM, aging,
and the status of SSTRs in diabetes, it is likely that destruction or decline
in beta cell numbers would result in reduction of the densities of these
receptors. We recently observed that a radioiodinated derivative of naphthylalanine,
(2R)-N-(6-amino-2,2,4-tri- methylhexyl)-2-[(5-iodo(3-pyridyl))carbonylamino]-3-(2-naphthyl)propanamide (IPC-β-AL3) localized
to the pancreas in mice [36]. In addition, we have synthesized (2R)-N-(6-amino-2,2,4-trimethylhexyl)-2-[(5-iodo(3-pyridyl))- carbonylamino]- 3 -(naphthyl)propanamide,
(IPC-α-AL3). This
paper reports further biological evaluation of the tracers as potential
pancreatic beta cell detection agents.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
All chemicals and
reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Fisher, or Fluka. Radioactive
samples were counted in a Packard-Canberra Cobra 5000 gamma counter. The NOD
mice were purchased from Taconic,
USA. Blood
glucose levels were measured with a glucometer (AccuCheck, Roche). Radioligand
binding data was analyzed using GraphPad
Prism 4.0 (San Diego, USA).
2.1. Isolation of mouse pancreatic
islets
The method used was adopted from a published
procedure with minor modifications [37]. Briefly, the pancreata of the mice
(females, aged 8 weeks) were removed immediately after death by CO2 asphyxiation and minced on ice in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM).
Excess fat was dissected and removed by washing with the medium. The tissue was
digested with collagenase type IV (10 mg/g of wet tissue) for 45 minutes at 37°C on a shaker. The reaction was
quenched by the addition of DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and
centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes. The cell pellet was washed three times and
resuspended in the same medium containing 11 mmol/L glucose. Viability was
checked by the trypan blue exclusion method, and cells were quantified using a
hemocytometer. The islets were maintained in culture in the DMEM medium at 37°C and 5% CO2 atmosphere.
2.2. Stable transfection of CHO cells
with somatostatin receptor subtype-1 (SSTR1)
The CHO cell line was obtained from
ATCC (Rockville, MD, USA) and maintained in Ham's F12 medium supplemented with
fetal calf serum (10%), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin in a
humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The cells were transfected
with the SSTR1 construct under the control of the CMV promoter (UMR cDNA Resource Center,
Rolla, MO, USA, www.cdna.org), using lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, CA, USA). Forty-eight hours after
transfection, the cells were cultured in the F12 medium containing 400 μg/mL of
G418. Three weeks after G418 selection, the stable clones were pooled for the
binding experiments.
2.3. Radioligand binding studies
The mouse islets were isolated as described
above and used immediately after recovery in DMEM medium containing glucose (3 mmol/L) for 60 minutes. The [125I]-Tyr11-SS-14 was prepared as described earlier [36].
Briefly, the islets were placed in the binding buffer system (TRIS buffer 0.15
mol/L, 0.1% BSA, 1 mmol/L CaCl2, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 50 μg/mL
bacitracin, and 50 μg phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride [PMSF]) in the presence of
increasing concentration of the radioligand (0.02–5 nmol/L). The
reactants were incubated for 1 hour, and the reaction was quenched with ice-cold
buffer (1 mL). The cells were isolated using a cell harvester (Brandel, Inc. USA)
and washed twice with cold-buffered saline. Cell-bound radioactivity was
assayed using a gamma counter. The data were fitted to a regression function to
estimate binding affinity as well as receptor density. This data was published
previously [36]. The experiment was repeated using CHO cell lines separately
expressing SSTR1 and SSTR2 (SSTR2 was donated by Dr. Hans-J Wester, Technical
University of Munich). Displacement tests were also carried out on the two cell
lines using increasing concentrations of SS-14, IPC-α-AL3, and IPC-β-AL3 (10 pmol/L–20 μmol/L) and a
fixed amount of [125I]-Tyr11-SS-14 (100,000 cpm).
2.4. Biodistribution of [131I]-AL3 derivatives in normal CBA/J
and NOD mice
The animal experiments were carried
out in accordance with institutional, national, and international guidelines
for humane use of animals in research, and the local review committee approved
the protocol. Each mouse (the characteristics of the mice used are shown in
Table 1) was injected with 0.1 mL of the [131I]-IPC-β-AL3 solution
containing 185 kBq (5 μCi) and approximately 500 ng of the labeled material.
The mice were mildly anesthetized and killed by cervical dislocation at 15, 30,
60, and 120 minutes post-injection. Organs and tissues of interest were dissected,
weighed, and counted in a gamma counter, calibrated for the radionuclide. The
percent-injected activity per gram of tissue (per whole organ for the thyroid)
was then calculated for the samples. The injected activity per mouse was
estimated by counting a standard sample taken from the injectate. The
experiment was repeated in 16-week-old mice. Parallel experiments were
performed using NOD mice at 5, 8, and 16 weeks old. The [131I]-IPC-α-AL3 was
similarly tested in 5-week-old CBA/J mice.
Table 1
Characteristics of mice used in the biodistribution studies. Values are means ± standard deviations for n ≥ 4.
ND = not determined.
Age (weeks)
CBA/J
NOD
Weight (g)
Glucose (mg/dL)
Weight (g)
Glucose (mg/dL)
5
22 ± 3
70–100
22 ± 3
88–160
8
ND
ND
25 ± 2
120–180
16
27 ± 3
70–90
26 ± 2
260–450
2.5. Autoradiography
In the ex vivo experiment, two control CBA/J mice and two NOD mice (17 weeks
old, blood glucose >300 mg/dL) were each injected with 740 kBq (20 μCi) of [125I]-IPC-β-AL3. The
animals were killed 60 minutes post injection. Pancreata were harvested and washed in 50%
aqueous ethanol. The specimens were mounted on microscope slides, carefully
pressed so that they were spread out evenly, and covered with a transparent
adhesive tape. The samples were imaged (InstantImager, Packard) for
approximately 10 minutes acquisition time. The experiment was repeated on two
26-week-old NOD mice (blood glucose >400 mg/dL), where the animals were
injected with the same amount of radioactive tracer.In a parallel experiment, ex vivo autoradiography was performed in
NOD and CBA/J mice, these animals were 17 weeks old. The animals were killed,
and pancreata were removed and fixed in PBS-formalin (4%, pH 7.5). The samples
were processed and embedded in paraffin. Sections (5 μm) were deparaffinized in
xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanol (100%, 95%, 75%) to deionized water.
The mounted sections were incubated with the radioiodinated IPC-β-AL3 (500,000 cpm) for 60 minutes at ambient temperature. The slides were washed thoroughly with
binding buffer, and the samples imaged.
2.6. Microscopy/immunohistochemistry
To investigate the cellular location of the
radiolabeled tracer observed in the biodistribution and ex vivo autoradiographic studies, immunofluorescence and histology
experiments were performed. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled β-AL3
(β-AL3-FITC) was prepared by incubating equimolar amounts (6 μmol) of β-AL3 and
FITC in methanol in the presence of triethylamine at ambient temperature for 60 minutes. The solid product was isolated and characterized by electrospray mass
spectroscopy. Normal CBA/J and NOD mice (16 weeks old) were injected with β-AL3
(β-AL3-FITC, 1 μg/mouse). One hour post administration, the animals were killed
and pancreata were removed and fixed in PBS-formalin (4%, pH 7.5). The samples
were embedded in paraffin, and thin sections (5 μm) were cut and stained with
hematoxylin and eosin. For colocalization experiments, comparable sections were
deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanol (100%, 95%, 75%) to
deionized water, permeabilized with Triton X100 and treated with both
β-AL3-FITC (1 μg/mL) and anti-insulin antibody (mouse monoclonal IgG, Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, USA) for 60 minutes at ambient temperature. They were then
viewed by confocal microscopy (images were acquired using Ultra View LCI confocal system (PerkinElmer, USA). Images were processed using
Volocity improvision software
(Improvision Inc. Coventry, UK) using indirect
immunofluorescence of TRITC-conjugated affinity purified donkey antimouse IgG
(Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, Inc., USA). These colocalization
experiments were confirmed using isolated formalin-fixed mouse islets. The
islets were isolated as described earlier. To test whether the uptake of
β-AL3-FITC by the islets and fixed sections was mediated through AL3, the
experiment was repeated with fluorescein isothiocyanate alone.
2.7. Statistical
analysis
Means were compared using student's
t-test, and a P-value of < 0.05 was
considered significant.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Radioligand binding studies
Radioligand binding studies were
performed to assess the integrity of the isolated islets. [125I]-Tyr-SS-14 was used in
saturation as well as displacement studies. The receptor binding studies performed
with SSTR1 cells revealed that a binding equilibrium was attained after 60 minutes
at ambient temperature. The estimated β
was 1 × 103 receptors/cell.
The IC50 values for IPC-β-AL3 for the SSTR1 and SSTR2 expressing
cell lines were 1.83 nM and 297 nM, respectively (see Figure 1). IPC-α-AL3 was of
low affinity and was in the μM range (data not shown).
Figure 1
Competitive
radioligand binding plots, using [125I]-Tyr11-SS-14 as the radioligand on the two cell lines demonstrated higher affinity for SSTR1 than SSTR2. (Data for IPC-a-AL3 were not included because
of low specificity.)
3.2. Biodistribution and autoradiography
The initial biodistribution was
performed in sex- and age-matched nonobese diabetic (NOD) and normal CBA/J mice.
A statistically significant difference in the pancreatic uptake of
radioactivity was observed at 5 weeks of age. When the experiment was repeated
on 8- and 16-week-old NOD and the CBA/J mice, pancreatic uptake again showed a
significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Although the uptake in the 8-week-old NOD mice was
slightly higher than that of the 16-week-old NOD mice, the difference was not
statistically significant (P < 0.05). Figure 2 shows the general biodistribution of the tracer in NOD mice at
5 weeks of age. Uptake decreased with age in the NOD mice (see Table 2), but not in
the CBA/J mice.
Figure 2
Biodistribution of [131I]-IPC-β-AL3 in NOD mice. The values are means and
standard deviations of % injected radioactivity per gram. Each point represents
n ≥ 4 mice at 5 weeks old.
Table 2
Comparative biodistribution of [131I]-IPC-β-AL3 in normal CBA/J
and NOD mice with age, 60 minutes post injection. Values are means ± standard
deviations of % ID/g, where n = ≥ 4 per
time point. The small intestine was measured with its contents. The value for
the thyroid is for the whole organ (% ID/organ).
Mouse
groups by age (weeks) and strain
5
8
16
Organ/Tissue
CBA/J
NOD
CBA/J
NOD
CBA/J
NOD
Blood
0.7 ± 0.1
1.2 ± 0.1
0.9 ± 0.2
0.6 ± 0.1
0.5 ± 0.1
0.3 ± 0.1
Heart
1.8 ± 0.6
0.7 ± 0.2
2.3 ± 0.7
1.0 ± 0.4
1.2 ± 0.2
0.5 ± 0.1
Intestine (small)
20.7 ± 13.3
10.5 ± 2.7
7.4 ± 1.9*
3.3 ± 1.5*
12.5 ± 3.9
17.1 ± 5.1
Kidney
24.6 ± 7.9
6.5 ± 0.6
13.2 ± 3.3
6.5 ± 1.6
14.4 ± 4.3
5.3 ± 1.1
Liver
3.9 ± 0.6
3.3 ± 0.8
4.4 ± 0.4
3.6 ± 1.4
2.7 ± 0.6
2.1 ± 0.4
Lung
5.8 ± 1.6
2.3 ± 0.3
3.6 ± 1.0
2.3 ± 1.0
3.4 ± 0.7
3.8 ± 1.6
Muscle
—
0.4 ± 0.1
0.5 ± 0.1
0.3 ± 0.1
—
0.3 ± 0.1
Pancreas
5.5 ± 1.1
2.3 ± 0.2
3.4 ± 1.3
1.9 ± 0.8
5.2 ± 0.6
1.6 ± 0.3
Spleen
5.2 ± 1.1
1.7 ± 0.5
2.8 ± 1.1
1.8 ± 0.8
4.4 ± 2.1
1.1 ± 0.3
Thyroid
0.4 ± 0.2
—
—
—
0.2 ± 0.1
—-
*The intestines were measured without
their contents.
Autoradiographs were obtained by
imaging the pancreata of the CBA/J and NOD mice. The images demonstrated that
at 16 weeks old, there was a significant difference in pancreatic uptake
between the mouse strains (see Figures 3(a)–3(d)). Figure 3(e)
shows the image for a 26-week-old NOD mouse. According to ex vivo autoradiograms
(see Figures 3(f)–3(h)), the extent of radioactivity accumulation correlated with the
number of visible islets in pancreatic sections of the CBA-J mouse under light
microscope (see Figure 4(e)).
Figure 3
Autoradiographic images of mice pancreas injected with [125I]-IPC-β-AL3 and
sacrificed 60 minutes post injection. (a) and (b) = CBA/J normal mice, (c) and (d) = 17-week-old,
and (e) = 26-week-old NOD mice injected with the same quantity of radioactivity.
Note the intense and scattered radioactivity in the CBA/J mice. Ex vivo
autoradiograms of pancreata from normal (CBA/J) and diabetic (NOD) mice (17 weeks old). The sections were
5 μm in thickness, and images were from 30 minutes of exposure. (f) and (g) = CBA/J, (h) = NOD.
Figure 4
(a) Light and fluorescent micrographs of an islet, (b) the same islet labeled with
AL3-FITC, (c) and the two images superimposed. (d) A hematoxylin and eosin stained
section from an NOD mouse (e) and normal CBA/J pancreatic sections (e; 10× magnification).
Note the presence of islets in the normal pancreas (arrows) and none in the
diabetic.
3.3. Microscopy/immunohistochemistry
To further corroborate this autoradiographic
observation and the results of the radiotracer biodistribution studies, the colocalization
experiment was repeated on islets isolated from normal CBA/J mice. This
experiment could not be repeated in the NOD mice because enough islets could
not be obtained. Additionally, hematoxylin-eosin stained and unstained sections
showed no visible islets in 26-week-old NOD mice. However, there were islets of
varying dimensions in the normal mice (see Figures 4(a)–4(e)). Fluorescence microscopy and histology experiments showed
that the conjugate localized to the cell membrane (see Figure 5(a)). When fluorescein
isothiocyanate alone was used, the uptake of dye in the pancreas was largely
nonspecific. This indicated that the localization process was mediated through
the AL3 portion of the conjugate. Confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed
colocalization of the ligand with insulin. The insulin was localized to the
cell membrane as well as in the cytoplasm, whereas the tracer was apparently
cell membrane-bound (see Figure 5(b)).
Figure 5
(a) A representative
tomographic image of an islet stained with AL3-FITC. Note the concentration
of the compound in the cell membrane. (b) Confocal laser scanning fluorescent
micrographs of isolated mouse islet indirectly labeled for insulin (red) and AL3-FITC (green). The
superimposed images are shown in the lower right micrograph.
4. DISCUSSION
Although progress has been reported
in recent years [18, 22–25], such an imaging modality has not yet been fully
realized. We recently reported the synthesis of a radiolabeled peptidomimetic
based on (D)-2-naphthylalanine and hexanediamine and performed initial in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Our results indicated that the tracer was localized
in the normal mouse pancreas [36]. We have further evaluated the radiotracers
and shown that the pancreatic beta cells were the main target.
4.1. Radioligand
binding studies
Radioligand binding studies
performed on isolated mouse islets and two Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell
lines separately expressing SSTR1 and SSTR2 yielded Kd and IC50 values
that were consistent
with previously reported values [38]. Likewise, evaluation of SSTR1 expression
in SSTR1-transfected cells using a radiolabeled SST analog revealed that the SST
analog affinity was in the nanomolar range, and that the number of receptors per
cell was in the 103 range. The results showed that the selectivity of the
radioligand for SSTR1 was greater than 100 times in comparison with the SSTR2.
4.2. Biodistribution
in mice
A statistically significant
difference (P < .05) in the
pancreatic uptake of radioactivity was observed at 5 weeks of age. This
experiment was repeated when the mice were 8 and 16 weeks old, and pancreatic
uptake again showed a significant difference between the CBA/J and NOD age
groups. This observation may be indicative of the severity of diabetes in these
mice. The biodistribution data also showed that the decrease in pancreatic
uptake was not age related. We did not observe any significant difference in
the control mice between 5 to 16 weeks of age. However, as a potential imaging
agent for the beta cells the relatively higher uptake in the liver, intestine,
and the spleen is a major drawback because of the proximity of these organs to
the pancreas. This potential interference may be minimized by making the tracer
less lipophilic. One approach will be to prepare a metal (Tc-99m) chelate by
attaching a chelator to the nonessential part of the molecule.
4.3. Autoradiography
Radioactivity was localized and
concentrated in the pancreas in a pattern similar to the anatomical structure
of islets in the pancreas. Our observations reflected the typical scattered
appearance of islets in the pancreas surrounded by nonendocrine tissue [18].
Although we did not quantify the beta cells in the islets in the fixed
pancreatic sections, visual counting under a light microscope showed that there
were several islets of varying sizes. This observation correlated with the
extent of radioactivity accumulation in the ex vivo autoradiograms.
4.4. Histology
and microscopic studies
The heterogeneous
distribution pattern of radioactivity within the pancreas seemed to follow the
variation of islet sizes and densities seen in the hematoxylin-eosin stained sections. However, the NOD mice showed pancreatic uptake slightly
above background radioactivity. This observation may be due to nonspecific
binding and confirmed what we observed in the previous blocking studies [36]. The
uptake was increased 2-3 folds in the
normal compared with the NOD mice at 26 weeks of age. The lack of substantial radioactivity in the pancreata of
NOD mice was confirmed by the paucity of visible islets in the pancreatic sections of these mice.
Nonetheless, the apparent high uptake in the CBA/J mice cannot be
explained by perfusion alone since the circulating radioactivity in the blood
was low at later time points in the biodistribution experiments. Additionally,
if the uptake in the pancreas was due to inflammation during immune cell
infiltration of the pancreas (associated with leaky vasculature), then the NOD
mice would be expected to show a higher uptake than normal CBA/J mice, but this
was not observed.Fluorescence microscopy and
histology experiments indicated that the localization process was mediated
through the AL3 portion of the conjugate. The insulin was localized to the cell
membrane as well as in the cytoplasm; whereas the tracer was apparently cell
membrane-bound. There are two possible explanations for this result. It may be
due to the presence of insulin bound to its receptors on the plasma membranes
of the islets, or due to leakage of insulin, which was then fixed to the plasma
membrane during tissue processing, from the secretory granules. Nonetheless,
these data suggest that the tracer localizes to the islets, and the beta cells are
its target. Consistent with our prior result, when the colocalization
experiment was repeated on isolated mouse islets, images of live cells demonstrated
that insulin was present in the cell membrane as well as in the cytoplasm, while
the tracer was bound to the cell membrane. These radioligand binding and live
cell imaging data indicate that the uptake of radioactivity in the pancreas was
receptor-mediated and that SSTR1, but not SSTR2, was largely targeted.Collectively, the data show that
the tracer binds to beta cells. The extent of localization may be indicative of
the stage of diabetes development in these mice. Although the results showed a
reasonable contrast between normal and diabetic pancreata, in our estimation, it
was not high enough for good in vivo imaging. The data also suggest SSTR1 involvement in the pancreatic uptake of
the tracer; however, there appeared to be nonspecific binding as well. To
overcome this shortcoming, this molecule may need to be optimized to obtain a higher
signal-to-background ratio by decreasing the lipophilicity. This investigation
is already in progress in our laboratory.
5. CONCLUSION
Our results indicate that this novel
radiotracer targets beta cells in the mouse pancreas. We can also infer that
decreased pancreatic uptake of the radiotracer in NOD mice may be directly
related to the progressive destruction of beta cells in these mice.
Authors: R Barone; E Procaccini; M Chianelli; A Annovazzi; V Fiore; M Hawa; G Nardi; G Ronga; P Pozzilli; A Signore Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Date: 1998-05
Authors: S Moldovan; A Atiya; T E Adrian; R M Kleinman; K Lloyd; K Olthoff; D Imagawa; L Shevlin; D Coy; J Walsh Journal: J Surg Res Date: 1995-07 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: I Virgolini; P Angelberger; S Li; Q Yang; A Kurtaran; M Raderer; N Neuhold; K Kaserer; M Leimer; M Peck-Radosavljevic; W Scheithauer; B Niederle; H G Eichler; P Valent Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Date: 1996-10
Authors: S W Mitra; E Mezey; B Hunyady; L Chamberlain; E Hayes; F Foor; Y Wang; A Schonbrunn; J M Schaeffer Journal: Endocrinology Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: P B Clark; H D Gage; C Brown-Proctor; N Buchheimer; J Calles-Escandon; R H Mach; K A Morton Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: A Signore; M Chianelli; A Toscano; L Monetini; G Ronga; C C Nimmon; K E Britton; P Pozzilli; M Negri Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 1992-10 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Leah V Steyn; Kameswari Ananthakrishnan; Miranda J Anderson; Renata Patek; Amy Kelly; Josef Vagner; Ronald M Lynch; Sean W Limesand Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 3.488