Literature DB >> 18482905

Caecilian jaw-closing mechanics: integrating two muscle systems.

Thomas Kleinteich1, Alexander Haas, Adam P Summers.   

Abstract

Caecilians (Lissamphibia: Gymnophiona) are unique among vertebrates in having two sets of jaw-closing muscles, one on either side of the jaw joint. Using data from high-resolution X-ray radiation computed tomography scans, we modelled the effect of these two muscle groups (mm. levatores mandibulae and m. interhyoideus posterior) on bite force over a range of gape angles, employing a simplified lever arm mechanism that takes into account muscle cross-sectional area and fibre angle. Measurements of lever arm lengths, muscle fibre orientations and physiological cross-sectional area of cranial muscles were available from three caecilian species: Ichthyophis cf. kohtaoensis; Siphonops annulatus; and Typhlonectes natans. The maximal gape of caecilians is restricted by a critical gape angle above which the mm. levatores mandibulae will open the jaw and destabilize the mandibular joint. The presence of destabilizing forces in the caecilian jaw mechanism may be compensated for by a mandibular joint in that the fossa is wrapped around the condyle to resist dislocation. The caecilian skull is streptostylic; the quadrate-squamosal complex moves with respect to the rest of the skull. This increases the leverage of the jaw-closing muscles. We also demonstrate that the unusual jaw joint requires streptostyly because there is a dorsolateral movement of the quadrate-squamosal complex when the jaw closes. The combination of the two jaw-closing systems results in high bite forces over a wide range of gape angles, an important advantage for generalist feeders such as caecilians. The relative sizes and leverage mechanics of the two closing systems allow one to exert more force when the other has a poor mechanical advantage. This effect is seen in all three species we examined. In the aquatic T. natans, with its less well-roofed skull, there is a larger contribution of the mm. levatores mandibulae to total bite force than in the terrestrial I. cf. kohtaoensis and S. annulatus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18482905      PMCID: PMC2607354          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  18 in total

1.  Mandibular arch musculature of anuran tadpoles, with comments on homologies of amphibian jaw muscles.

Authors:  A Haas
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.804

Review 2.  Cranial kinesis in the amphibia: a review.

Authors:  N N Iordanskiĭ
Journal:  Zh Obshch Biol       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.465

3.  Location of the vector of jaw muscle force in mammals.

Authors:  W S Greaves
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.804

4.  A molecular phylogeny of ichthyophiid caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae): out of India or out of South East Asia?

Authors:  David J Gower; Alex Kupfer; Oommen V Oommen; Werner Himstedt; Ronald A Nussbaum; Simon P Loader; Bronwen Presswell; Hendrik Müller; Sharath B Krishna; Renaud Boistel; Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A biomechanical model for analysis of muscle force, power output and lower jaw motion in fishes.

Authors:  Mark W Westneat
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Analysis of the bite force and mechanical design of the feeding mechanism of the durophagous horn shark Heterodontus francisci.

Authors:  Daniel R Huber; Thomas G Eason; Robert E Hueter; Philip J Motta
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  The retro-articular process, streptostyly and the caecilian jaw closing system.

Authors:  Adam P Summers; Marvalee H Wake
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  A subterranean generalist predator: diet of the soil-dwelling caecilian Gegeneophis ramaswamii (Amphibia; Gymnophiona; Caeciliidae) in southern India.

Authors:  John G Measey; David J Gower; Oommen V Oommen; Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  C R Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.583

9.  Bite performance in clariid fishes with hypertrophied jaw adductors as deduced by bite modeling.

Authors:  Anthony Herrel; Dominique Adriaens; Walter Verraes; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.804

10.  Comparative analysis of methods for determining bite force in the spiny dogfish Squalus acanthias.

Authors:  Daniel Robert Huber; Philip Jay Motta
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Bite force is limited by the force-length relationship of skeletal muscle in black carp, Mylopharyngodon piceus.

Authors:  Nicholas J Gidmark; Nicolai Konow; Eric Lopresti; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  The importance of accurate muscle modelling for biomechanical analyses: a case study with a lizard skull.

Authors:  Flora Gröning; Marc E H Jones; Neil Curtis; Anthony Herrel; Paul O'Higgins; Susan E Evans; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Morphological evolution and modularity of the caecilian skull.

Authors:  Carla Bardua; Mark Wilkinson; David J Gower; Emma Sherratt; Anjali Goswami
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.260

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.