Literature DB >> 11124683

Mandibular arch musculature of anuran tadpoles, with comments on homologies of amphibian jaw muscles.

A Haas1.   

Abstract

This study analyzes the structure of the mandibular arch musculature in larval, metamorphic, and postmetamorphic anurans of 26 species and makes comparisons with larvae of three caudate and one gymnophione species. Major transformations in early evolution of anuran larvae comprise, for example, the powering of the larval upper jaw cartilages by relocating insertion sites of mandibular arch levators; splitting of some larval muscles into two muscles or muscle heads (m. intermandibularis, m. lev. mand. externus, m. lev. mand. longus); evolution of a muscle invading the lower lip of the oral disk (m. mandibulolabialis), and shift of origin of the internus and longus muscles from dorsal on the cranium to sites on the ventral otic capsule and palatoquadrate, respectively. In all these characters, Ascaphus truei shares the plesiomorphic conditions with caudates. The larva of Xenopus laevis is remarkable because the insertion pattern of three larval mandibular muscles anticipates the postmetamorphic condition of frogs in general and also resembles the caudate condition. Discoglossids, bombinatorids, pelobatids, and neobatrachians are largely similar in their muscle arrangements. The filter-feeding microhylids, however, have most clearly modified the general neobatrachian pattern. Past conflicts in the interpretation and naming of muscles can be attributed to the implicit or explicit homology assumptions used. In particular, the muscles' relations to the branches of the trigeminal nerve have been the dominant criteria for inferring homology and has led to inconsistencies. This concept is questioned herein. It is observed that the relative position of the ramus mandibularis (V(3)) is more variable interspecifically in anuran larvae than previously thought. The relations of the nerve branches and muscles in larvae are maintained during metamorphosis. Considering the muscle pattern to be more conserved in interspecific comparisons than the position of the nerve branches results in a new interpretation of muscle homologies and a hypothesis of jaw muscle evolution in amphibians that is more parsimonious than earlier views. A new, simplified terminology for the jaw musculature is proposed that is applicable for larvae and adults. It maximizes information content and reflects the hypothesized homologies of amphibian jaw muscles. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11124683     DOI: 10.1002/1097-4687(200101)247:1<1::AID-JMOR1000>3.0.CO;2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  12 in total

1.  Vertebrate head development: segmentation, novelties, and homology.

Authors:  Lennart Olsson; Rolf Ericsson; Robert Cerny
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 1.919

Review 2.  Connecting muscle development, birth defects, and evolution: An essential role for muscle connective tissue.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sefton; Gabrielle Kardon
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Developmental origins of species-specific muscle pattern.

Authors:  Masayoshi Tokita; Richard A Schneider
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Caecilian jaw-closing mechanics: integrating two muscle systems.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinteich; Alexander Haas; Adam P Summers
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Digital dissection of the head of the frogs Calyptocephalella gayi and Leptodactylus pentadactylus with emphasis on the feeding apparatus.

Authors:  Stephanie Kunisch; Valentin Blüml; Thomas Schwaha; Christian Josef Beisser; Stephan Handschuh; Patrick Lemell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  The jaw adductor muscle complex in teleostean fishes: evolution, homologies and revised nomenclature (osteichthyes: actinopterygii).

Authors:  Aléssio Datovo; Richard P Vari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Morphology of the jaw, suspensorial, and opercle musculature of Beloniformes and related species (Teleostei: Acanthopterygii), with a special reference to the m. adductor mandibulae complex.

Authors:  Ingmar Werneburg
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 8.  Developmental changes and novelties in ceratophryid frogs.

Authors:  Marissa Fabrezi; Silvia Inés Quinzio; Javier Goldberg; Julio César Cruz; Mariana Chuliver Pereyra; Richard J Wassersug
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.250

9.  The braincase of Eocaecilia micropodia (Lissamphibia, Gymnophiona) and the origin of Caecilians.

Authors:  Hillary C Maddin; Farish A Jenkins; Jason S Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Development of mandibular, hyoid and hypobranchial muscles in the zebrafish: homologies and evolution of these muscles within bony fishes and tetrapods.

Authors:  Rui Diogo; Yaniv Hinits; Simon M Hughes
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 1.978

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.