Literature DB >> 18482347

Is there a lower threshold value of bone density for early loading protocols of dental implants?

I Turkyilmaz1, Edwin A McGlumphy.   

Abstract

This clinical study aimed to determine the bone density in dental implant recipient sites using computerized tomography (CT) and to establish a lower threshold value of bone density for early loading protocols. The study group was composed of 100 early loaded implants in 42 patients. A total of four groups were established according to the loading time and implant sites. The bone density of each recipient site for implant placement was determined using CT. The maximum insertion torque values were recorded with torque controlling machine. Implant stability measurements were performed with resonance frequency analyser. The bone density values varied from 528 to 1231 HU. It was found that mean bone density, insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis values were 887 +/- 180 HU, 41.2 +/- 6 Ncm, and 73.7 +/- 4 ISQ, respectively. Strong correlations were found between these three parameters. CT may be a useful tool for assessing the bone density of recipient areas before implant placement, and the early loading of dental implants may be possible in the implant sites where bone density is over 528 HU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18482347     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01867.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  9 in total

1.  Digital subtraction radiography evaluation of longitudinal bone density changes around immediate loading implants: a pilot study.

Authors:  L S Carneiro; H A da Cunha; C R Leles; E F Mendonça
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Short implants had lower survival rates in posterior jaws compared to standard implants.

Authors:  Gary L Stafford
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2016-12

3.  Effect of ultra-low doses, ASIR and MBIR on density and noise levels of MDCT images of dental implant sites.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Reema Al-Shawaf; Peter Schullian; Ra'ed Al-Sadhan; Romed Hörmann; Asma'a A Al-Ekrish
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Determination of the dynamics of healing at the tissue-implant interface by means of microcomputed tomography and functional apparent moduli.

Authors:  Po-Chun Chang; Yang-Jo Seol; Steven A Goldstein; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Implant Survival between Endo-osseous Dental Implants in Immediate Loading, Delayed Loading, and Basal Immediate Loading Dental Implants a 3-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Ritesh Garg; Neha Mishra; Mohan Alexander; Sunil Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec

6.  Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone.

Authors:  Sun-Jong Kim; Myung-Rae Kim; Jae-Suk Rim; Sung-Min Chung; Sang-Wan Shin
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 7.  Ultralow Dose MSCT Imaging in Dental Implantology.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Asma'a A Al-Ekrish
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-01-31

8.  Restoring Edentulous Mandible with an Implant-Retained Overdenture in a Day by Means of Flapless Surgery and Stereolithographic Surgical Guide: a Case Report.

Authors:  Ilser Turkyilmaz
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2019-03-31

9.  Location of the mandibular canal and thickness of the occlusal cortical bone at dental implant sites in the lower second premolar and first molar.

Authors:  Jui-Ting Hsu; Heng-Li Huang; Lih-Jyh Fuh; Rou-Wei Li; Jay Wu; Ming-Tzu Tsai; Yen-Wen Shen; Ming-Gene Tu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-11-03       Impact factor: 2.238

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.