Literature DB >> 18482049

Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid, tacrolimus and sirolimus after gastric bypass surgery in end-stage renal disease and transplant patients: a pilot study.

Christin C Rogers1, Rita R Alloway, J Wesley Alexander, Michael Cardi, Jennifer Trofe, Alexander A Vinks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Promising data regarding the safety and efficacy of gastric bypass surgery (GBS) as an option to address obesity in the transplant population are emerging. The data lack on how GBS may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of modern immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to describe the alterations in the PK of modern immunosuppressants and the GBS population.
METHODS: Data are presented on six subjects who participated in this trial--four were on dialysis and two were renal transplant recipients. Dialysis-dependent bypass subjects received a single dose of 6 mg of sirolimus, two 4-mg doses of tacrolimus and two 1000-mg doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) over the 24-h study period. Transplant recipients continued their current regimen. Maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) and the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC(0-12) and AUC(0-infinity) where appropriate) were calculated for tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolic acid (MPA) and mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG).
RESULTS: Significant inter-patient variability in the C(max), T(max) and AUC of tacrolimus, sirolimus MPA and MPAG was observed. A notable difference in the AUC:dose ratio for tacrolimus was seen when comparing data with published data in the non-bypass population. Similar differences in PK were seen with sirolimus, MPA and MPAG.
CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the PK of sirolimus, tacrolimus, MPA and MPAG to published PK data in the non-bypass population, significant differences are observed. It is likely that transplant recipients with GBS would need higher doses of tacrolimus, sirolimus and MMF to provide similar exposure to a non-bypass patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18482049      PMCID: PMC3660730          DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00783.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  40 in total

Review 1.  Immunosuppression: practice and trends.

Authors:  Dixon B Kaufman; Ron Shapiro; Michael R Lucey; Wida S Cherikh; Rami T Bustami; David B Dyke
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  A comparative study of sirolimus tablet versus oral solution for prophylaxis of acute renal allograft rejection.

Authors:  Timothy H Mathew; Charles Van Buren; Barry D Kahan; Khalid Butt; Sundaram Hariharan; James J Zimmerman
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.126

3.  Enteric absorption of FK 506: estimation by a block liver perfusion technique in rats.

Authors:  Y Watanabe; M Sato; Y Abe; T Yamamoto; Y Kashu; A Horiuchi; Y Hamada; T Nakata; T Lee; K Kawachi
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Amikacin pharmacokinetics in morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric-bypass surgery.

Authors:  R A Blouin; K L Brouwer; K E Record; W O Griffen; P M Plezia; W John
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb

5.  The impact of body mass index on renal transplant outcomes: a significant independent risk factor for graft failure and patient death.

Authors:  Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Julie A Arndorfer; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Glucuronide and glucoside conjugation of mycophenolic acid by human liver, kidney and intestinal microsomes.

Authors:  M Shipkova; C P Strassburg; F Braun; F Streit; H J Gröne; V W Armstrong; R H Tukey; M Oellerich; E Wieland
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  A clinical pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus and sirolimus combination immunosuppression comparing simultaneous to separated administration.

Authors:  Vivian C McAlister; Kamran Mahalati; Kevork M Peltekian; Albert Fraser; Allan S MacDonald
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.681

8.  Dose-adjusted cyclosporine c2 in a patient with jejunoileal bypass as compared to seven other liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Rou-Yee Chenhsu; Youmin Wu; Daniel Katz; Stephen Rayhill
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Cyclosporine A pharmacokinetics in a cardiac allograft recipient with a jejuno-ileal bypass.

Authors:  G C Knight; M P Macris; M Peric; J M Duncan; O H Frazier; D A Cooley
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.066

10.  Simultaneous determination of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide in human plasma using a simple high-performance liquid chromatography procedure.

Authors:  M Shipkova; P D Niedmann; V W Armstrong; E Schütz; E Wieland; L M Shaw; M Oellerich
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  43 in total

1.  The effect of gastric bypass on the pharmacokinetics of serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Authors:  Giselle G Hamad; Joseph C Helsel; James M Perel; Gina M Kozak; Mary C McShea; Carolyn Hughes; Andrea L Confer; Dorothy K Sit; Carol A McCloskey; Katherine L Wisner
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 2.  Trends in oral drug bioavailability following bariatric surgery: examining the variable extent of impact on exposure of different drug classes.

Authors:  Adam S Darwich; Kathryn Henderson; Angela Burgin; Nicola Ward; Janet Whittam; Basil J Ammori; Darren M Ashcroft; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Kidney Transplant Candidates: a Case Series.

Authors:  Sergio Carandina; Laurent Genser; Manuela Bossi; Laura Montana; Alexandre Cortes; Marie Seman; Marc Danan; Christophe Barrat
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Bariatric surgery among kidney transplant candidates and recipients: analysis of the United States renal data system and literature review.

Authors:  Kian A Modanlou; Umadevi Muthyala; Huiling Xiao; Mark A Schnitzler; Paolo R Salvalaggio; Daniel C Brennan; Kevin C Abbott; Ralph J Graff; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Immunosuppression and allograft rejection following lung transplantation: evidence to date.

Authors:  Gregory I Snell; Glen P Westall; Miranda A Paraskeva
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Altered drug disposition following bariatric surgery: a research challenge.

Authors:  H Karl Greenblatt; David J Greenblatt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Bariatric Surgery in the Peritransplant Period.

Authors:  Sydney Pomenti; Sanket Mehta; Averill Guo; Julia Wattacheril
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-05-01

Review 8.  RYGB and Drug Disposition: How to Do Better? Analysis of Pharmacokinetic Studies and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Lorry Hachon; Xavier Declèves; Pauline Faucher; Claire Carette; Célia Lloret-Linares
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Impact of obesity on drug metabolism and elimination in adults and children.

Authors:  Margreke J E Brill; Jeroen Diepstraten; Anne van Rongen; Simone van Kralingen; John N van den Anker; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Bariatric surgery before and after kidney transplantation: long-term weight loss and allograft outcomes.

Authors:  Jordana B Cohen; Mary Ann Lim; Colleen M Tewksbury; Samuel Torres-Landa; Jennifer Trofe-Clark; Peter L Abt; Noel N Williams; Kristoffel R Dumon; Simin Goral
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.734

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.