BACKGROUND: Promising data regarding the safety and efficacy of gastric bypass surgery (GBS) as an option to address obesity in the transplant population are emerging. The data lack on how GBS may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of modern immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to describe the alterations in the PK of modern immunosuppressants and the GBS population. METHODS: Data are presented on six subjects who participated in this trial--four were on dialysis and two were renal transplant recipients. Dialysis-dependent bypass subjects received a single dose of 6 mg of sirolimus, two 4-mg doses of tacrolimus and two 1000-mg doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) over the 24-h study period. Transplant recipients continued their current regimen. Maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) and the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC(0-12) and AUC(0-infinity) where appropriate) were calculated for tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolic acid (MPA) and mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG). RESULTS: Significant inter-patient variability in the C(max), T(max) and AUC of tacrolimus, sirolimus MPA and MPAG was observed. A notable difference in the AUC:dose ratio for tacrolimus was seen when comparing data with published data in the non-bypass population. Similar differences in PK were seen with sirolimus, MPA and MPAG. CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the PK of sirolimus, tacrolimus, MPA and MPAG to published PK data in the non-bypass population, significant differences are observed. It is likely that transplant recipients with GBS would need higher doses of tacrolimus, sirolimus and MMF to provide similar exposure to a non-bypass patient.
BACKGROUND: Promising data regarding the safety and efficacy of gastric bypass surgery (GBS) as an option to address obesity in the transplant population are emerging. The data lack on how GBS may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of modern immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to describe the alterations in the PK of modern immunosuppressants and the GBS population. METHODS: Data are presented on six subjects who participated in this trial--four were on dialysis and two were renal transplant recipients. Dialysis-dependent bypass subjects received a single dose of 6 mg of sirolimus, two 4-mg doses of tacrolimus and two 1000-mg doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) over the 24-h study period. Transplant recipients continued their current regimen. Maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) and the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC(0-12) and AUC(0-infinity) where appropriate) were calculated for tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolic acid (MPA) and mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG). RESULTS: Significant inter-patient variability in the C(max), T(max) and AUC of tacrolimus, sirolimus MPA and MPAG was observed. A notable difference in the AUC:dose ratio for tacrolimus was seen when comparing data with published data in the non-bypass population. Similar differences in PK were seen with sirolimus, MPA and MPAG. CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the PK of sirolimus, tacrolimus, MPA and MPAG to published PK data in the non-bypass population, significant differences are observed. It is likely that transplant recipients with GBS would need higher doses of tacrolimus, sirolimus and MMF to provide similar exposure to a non-bypass patient.
Authors: Dixon B Kaufman; Ron Shapiro; Michael R Lucey; Wida S Cherikh; Rami T Bustami; David B Dyke Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2004 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Timothy H Mathew; Charles Van Buren; Barry D Kahan; Khalid Butt; Sundaram Hariharan; James J Zimmerman Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Y Watanabe; M Sato; Y Abe; T Yamamoto; Y Kashu; A Horiuchi; Y Hamada; T Nakata; T Lee; K Kawachi Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: M Shipkova; C P Strassburg; F Braun; F Streit; H J Gröne; V W Armstrong; R H Tukey; M Oellerich; E Wieland Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Vivian C McAlister; Kamran Mahalati; Kevork M Peltekian; Albert Fraser; Allan S MacDonald Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Giselle G Hamad; Joseph C Helsel; James M Perel; Gina M Kozak; Mary C McShea; Carolyn Hughes; Andrea L Confer; Dorothy K Sit; Carol A McCloskey; Katherine L Wisner Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Kian A Modanlou; Umadevi Muthyala; Huiling Xiao; Mark A Schnitzler; Paolo R Salvalaggio; Daniel C Brennan; Kevin C Abbott; Ralph J Graff; Krista L Lentine Journal: Transplantation Date: 2009-04-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Margreke J E Brill; Jeroen Diepstraten; Anne van Rongen; Simone van Kralingen; John N van den Anker; Catherijne A J Knibbe Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Jordana B Cohen; Mary Ann Lim; Colleen M Tewksbury; Samuel Torres-Landa; Jennifer Trofe-Clark; Peter L Abt; Noel N Williams; Kristoffel R Dumon; Simin Goral Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.734