Literature DB >> 18480064

A new tool for epidemiology: the usefulness of dynamic-agent models in understanding place effects on health.

Amy H Auchincloss1, Ana V Diez Roux.   

Abstract

A major focus of recent work on the spatial patterning of health has been the study of how features of residential environments or neighborhoods may affect health. Place effects on health emerge from complex interdependent processes in which individuals interact with each other and their environment and in which both individuals and environments adapt and change over time. Traditional epidemiologic study designs and statistical regression approaches are unable to examine these dynamic processes. These limitations have constrained the types of questions asked, the answers received, and the hypotheses and theoretical explanations that are developed. Agent-based models and other systems-dynamics models may help to address some of these challenges. Agent-based models are computer representations of systems consisting of heterogeneous microentities that can interact and change/adapt over time in response to other agents and features of the environment. Using these models, one can observe how macroscale dynamics emerge from microscale interactions and adaptations. A number of challenges and limitations exist for agent-based modeling. Nevertheless, use of these dynamic models may complement traditional epidemiologic analyses and yield additional insights into the processes involved and the interventions that may be most useful.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18480064     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  100 in total

1.  Using stylized agent-based models for population-environment research: A case study from the Galápagos Islands.

Authors:  Brian W Miller; Ian Breckheimer; Amy L McCleary; Liza Guzmán-Ramirez; Susan C Caplow; Jessica C Jones-Smith; Stephen J Walsh
Journal:  Popul Environ       Date:  2010-05-01

2.  Expanding the scope of risk assessment: methods of studying differential vulnerability and susceptibility.

Authors:  Joel Schwartz; David Bellinger; Thomas Glass
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Population- versus cohort-based modelling approaches.

Authors:  Olivier Ethgen; Baudouin Standaert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Complexity in built environment, health, and destination walking: a neighborhood-scale analysis.

Authors:  Cynthia Carlson; Semra Aytur; Kevin Gardner; Shannon Rogers
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Closing the gap in a generation: what more research do we need?

Authors:  Bruna Galobardes
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Systems science: a revolution in public health policy research.

Authors:  Patricia L Mabry; Stephen E Marcus; Pamela I Clark; Scott J Leischow; David Méndez
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Spreading dynamics on complex networks: a general stochastic approach.

Authors:  Pierre-André Noël; Antoine Allard; Laurent Hébert-Dufresne; Vincent Marceau; Louis J Dubé
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Six paths for the future of social epidemiology.

Authors:  Sandro Galea; Bruce G Link
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Enhancing dissemination and implementation research using systems science methods.

Authors:  Jessica G Burke; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Jennifer Watling Neal; Helen I Meissner; Michael Yonas; Patricia L Mabry
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2015-06

10.  A model of social influence on body mass index.

Authors:  Ross A Hammond; Joseph T Ornstein
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.