Literature DB >> 1847951

Ultrasound of the common bile duct in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

M A Stott1, P A Farrands, P B Guyer, K C Dewbury, J J Browning, R Sutton.   

Abstract

One hundred patients undergoing cholecystectomy underwent ultrasonography of the biliary tree on the day prior to surgery. At operation a per-operative cholangiogram was performed unless stones were palpable in the duct. Pre-operative biliary ultrasonography accurately identified dilatation of the common bile duct (sensitivity 96%, specificity 95%) but was less accurate at detecting common duct stones (sensitivity 36%, specificity 98%). Thirty three percent of patients with dilated ducts on ultrasound did not have stones in the duct, while 20% of patients with common duct stones had normal sized ducts. We conclude that ultrasonography alone cannot reliably select patients who require exploration of the common bile duct, or select patients for operative cholangiography. Although pre-operative demonstration of common bile duct dilation is an absolute indication for operative cholangiography, by itself it does not indicate the need for exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1847951     DOI: 10.1002/jcu.1870190203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound        ISSN: 0091-2751            Impact factor:   0.910


  13 in total

1.  Optical architecture design for detection of absorbers embedded in visceral fat.

Authors:  Robert Francis; James Florence; Duncan MacFarlane
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Once upon a Time a Guideline Was Used for the Evaluation of Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Fairy Tale or a Nightmare?

Authors:  Jorge Canena
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-08

Review 3.  [Diagnostics for diseases of the gallbladder and biliary tract from the viewpoint of the internist and surgeon. Demands made on radiological diagnostics].

Authors:  F M Reimann; H Friess
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Overuse of CT in patients with complicated gallstone disease.

Authors:  Jaime Benarroch-Gampel; Casey A Boyd; Kristin M Sheffield; Courtney M Townsend; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Accuracy of computed tomographic intravenous cholangiography (CT-IVC) with iotroxate in the detection of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Robert N Gibson; Janette M Vincent; Tony Speer; Neil A Collier; Keith Noack
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Clinical models are inaccurate in predicting bile duct stones in situ for patients with gallbladder.

Authors:  B Topal; S Fieuws; K Tomczyk; R Aerts; W Van Steenbergen; C Verslype; F Penninckx
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  [Cholestasis and liver dysfunction in critical care patients].

Authors:  M Kredel; J Brederlau; N Roewer; C Wunder
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Can cholangiography be safely abandoned in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  A Gillams; S Cheslyn-Curtis; R C Russell; W R Lees
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy.

Authors:  Renato Costi; Alessandro Gnocchi; Francesco Di Mario; Leopoldo Sarli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Performance of the Choledocholithiasis Diagnostic Score in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Catarina Gouveia; Rui Loureiro; Rosa Ferreira; Alexandre Oliveira Ferreira; António Alberto Santos; Maria Pia Costa Santos; Carolina Palmela; Marília Cravo
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.