OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on sympathetic nervous function in heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Neurohormonal dysregulation and cardiac autonomic dysfunction are associated with HF and contribute to HF progression and its poor prognosis. We hypothesized that mechanical resynchronization improves cardiac sympathetic function in HF. METHODS: Sixteen consecutive patients receiving CRT for advanced cardiomyopathy and 10 controls were included in this prospective study. NYHA class, 6-minute walk distance, echocardiographic parameters, plasma norepinephrine (NE) were assessed at baseline, 3-month and 6-month follow-up. Cardiac sympathetic function was determined by (123)iodine metaiodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-MIBG) scintigraphy and 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography. RESULTS: Along with improvement in NYHA class (3.1 +/- 0.3 to 2.1 +/- 0.4, P < 0.001) and LVEF (23 +/- 6% to 33 +/- 12%, P < 0.001), delayed heart/mediastinum (H/M) (123)I-MIBG ratio increased significantly (1.8 +/- 0.7 to 2.1 +/- 0.6, P = 0.04) while the H/M (123)I-MIBG washout rate decreased significantly (54 +/- 25% to 34 +/- 24%, P = 0.01) from baseline to 6-month follow-up. The heart rate variability (HRV) measured in SD of normal-to-normal intervals also increased significantly from baseline (82 +/- 30 ms) to follow-up (111 +/- 32 ms, P = 0.04). The improvement in NYHA after CRT was significantly associated with baseline (123)I-MIBG H/M washout rate (r = 0.65, P = 0.03). The improvement in LVESV index was associated with baseline (123)I-MIBG delayed H/M ratio (r =-0.67, P = 0.02) and H/M washout rate (r = 0.65, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: After CRT, improvements in cardiac symptoms and LV function were accompanied by rebalanced cardiac autonomic control as measured by (123)I-MIBG and HRV.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on sympathetic nervous function in heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Neurohormonal dysregulation and cardiac autonomic dysfunction are associated with HF and contribute to HF progression and its poor prognosis. We hypothesized that mechanical resynchronization improves cardiac sympathetic function in HF. METHODS: Sixteen consecutive patients receiving CRT for advanced cardiomyopathy and 10 controls were included in this prospective study. NYHA class, 6-minute walk distance, echocardiographic parameters, plasma norepinephrine (NE) were assessed at baseline, 3-month and 6-month follow-up. Cardiac sympathetic function was determined by (123)iodine metaiodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-MIBG) scintigraphy and 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography. RESULTS: Along with improvement in NYHA class (3.1 +/- 0.3 to 2.1 +/- 0.4, P < 0.001) and LVEF (23 +/- 6% to 33 +/- 12%, P < 0.001), delayed heart/mediastinum (H/M) (123)I-MIBG ratio increased significantly (1.8 +/- 0.7 to 2.1 +/- 0.6, P = 0.04) while the H/M (123)I-MIBG washout rate decreased significantly (54 +/- 25% to 34 +/- 24%, P = 0.01) from baseline to 6-month follow-up. The heart rate variability (HRV) measured in SD of normal-to-normal intervals also increased significantly from baseline (82 +/- 30 ms) to follow-up (111 +/- 32 ms, P = 0.04). The improvement in NYHA after CRT was significantly associated with baseline (123)I-MIBG H/M washout rate (r = 0.65, P = 0.03). The improvement in LVESV index was associated with baseline (123)I-MIBG delayed H/M ratio (r =-0.67, P = 0.02) and H/M washout rate (r = 0.65, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: After CRT, improvements in cardiac symptoms and LV function were accompanied by rebalanced cardiac autonomic control as measured by (123)I-MIBG and HRV.
Authors: Philip B Adamson; Karen J Kleckner; Warren L VanHout; Sriram Srinivasan; William T Abraham Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-07-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J N Cohn; T B Levine; M T Olivari; V Garberg; D Lura; G S Francis; A B Simon; T Rector Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1984-09-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D M Wieland; L E Brown; W L Rogers; K C Worthington; J L Wu; N H Clinthorne; C A Otto; D P Swanson; W H Beierwaltes Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1981-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: James B Young; William T Abraham; Andrew L Smith; Angel R Leon; Randy Lieberman; Bruce Wilkoff; Robert C Canby; John S Schroeder; L Bing Liem; Shelley Hall; Kevin Wheelan Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Niti R Aggarwal; Matthew W Martinez; Bernard J Gersh; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Kalyanam Shivkumar; Olujimi A Ajijola; Inder Anand; J Andrew Armour; Peng-Sheng Chen; Murray Esler; Gaetano M De Ferrari; Michael C Fishbein; Jeffrey J Goldberger; Ronald M Harper; Michael J Joyner; Sahib S Khalsa; Rajesh Kumar; Richard Lane; Aman Mahajan; Sunny Po; Peter J Schwartz; Virend K Somers; Miguel Valderrabano; Marmar Vaseghi; Douglas P Zipes Journal: J Physiol Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Madalena Coutinho Cruz; Ana Abreu; Guilherme Portugal; Helena Santa-Clara; Pedro S Cunha; Mario M Oliveira; Vanessa Santos; Luís Oliveira; Pedro Rio; Inês Rodrigues; Luís A Morais; Rui C Ferreira; Miguel M Carmo Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: D O Verschure; E Poel; G De Vincentis; V Frantellizzi; K Nakajima; O Gheysens; J R de Groot; H J Verberne Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 6.875