Literature DB >> 18478286

Finite difference iterative solvers for electroencephalography: serial and parallel performance analysis.

Derek N Barnes1, John S George, Kwong T Ng.   

Abstract

Currently the resolution of the head models used in electroencephalography (EEG) studies is limited by the speed of the forward solver. Here, we present a parallel finite difference technique that can reduce the solution time of the governing Poisson equation for a head model. Multiple processors are used to work on the problem simultaneously in order to speed up the solution and provide the memory for solving large problems. The original computational domain is divided into multiple rectangular partitions. Each partition is then assigned to a processor, which is responsible for all the computations and inter-processor communication associated with the nodes in that particular partition. Since the forward solution time is mainly spent on solving the associated matrix equation, it is desirable to find the optimum matrix solver. A detailed comparison of various iterative solvers was performed for both isotropic and anisotropic realistic head models constructed from MRI images. The conjugate gradient (CG) method preconditioned with an advanced geometric multigrid technique was found to provide the best overall performance. For an anisotropic model with 256 x 128 x 256 cells, this technique provides a speedup of 508 on 32 processors over the serial CG solution, with a speedup of 20.1 and 25.3 through multigrid preconditioning and parallelization, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18478286     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-008-0344-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  11 in total

1.  Dipole location errors in electroencephalogram source analysis due to volume conductor model errors.

Authors:  B Vanrumste; G Van Hoey; R Van de Walle; M D'Havé; I Lemahieu; P Boon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The validation of the finite difference method and reciprocity for solving the inverse problem in EEG dipole source analysis.

Authors:  B Vanrumste; G Van Hoey; R Van de Walle; M R D'Havé; I A Lemahieu; P A Boon
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Boundary element method volume conductor models for EEG source reconstruction.

Authors:  M Fuchs; M Wagner; J Kastner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Comparing iterative solvers for linear systems associated with the finite difference discretisation of the forward problem in electro-encephalographic source analysis.

Authors:  M Mohr; B Vanrumste
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  A computationally efficient method for accurately solving the EEG forward problem in a finely discretized head model.

Authors:  Lora A Neilson; Mikhail Kovalyov; Zoltan J Koles
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  A finite difference method with reciprocity used to incorporate anisotropy in electroencephalogram dipole source localization.

Authors:  Hans Hallez; Bart Vanrumste; Peter Van Hese; Yves D'Asseler; Ignace Lemahieu; Rik Van de Walle
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Daniel Güllmar; Jens Haueisen; Michael Eiselt; Frank Giessler; Lars Flemming; Alfred Anwander; Thomas R Knösche; Carsten H Wolters; Matthias Dümpelmann; David S Tuch; Jürgen R Reichenbach
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  A finite difference method for solving the three-dimensional EEG forward problem.

Authors:  Li Jing; Shanan Zhu; Bin He
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2005

9.  Calculation of electrical potentials on the surface of a realistic head model by finite differences.

Authors:  L Lemieux; A McBride; J W Hand
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  New finite difference formulations for general inhomogeneous anisotropic bioelectric problems.

Authors:  H I Saleheen; K T Ng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  2 in total

1.  A 3D finite-difference BiCG iterative solver with the Fourier-Jacobi preconditioner for the anisotropic EIT/EEG forward problem.

Authors:  Sergei Turovets; Vasily Volkov; Aleksej Zherdetsky; Alena Prakonina; Allen D Malony
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 2.238

2.  Frequency-pattern functional tomography of magnetoencephalography data allows new approach to the study of human brain organization.

Authors:  Rodolfo R Llinás; Mikhail N Ustinin
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.492

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.