Literature DB >> 18478189

Prognostic value of 64-slice coronary angiography in diabetes mellitus patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease compared with a nondiabetic population.

F Cademartiri1, S Seitun, M Romano, E Maffei, M Fusaro, A Palumbo, A Aldrovandi, G Messalli, S Tresoldi, R Malagò, V Brambilla.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography (MSCT) in a population of diabetic subjects with known or suspected ischaemic heart disease compared with a nondiabetic control population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) [group 1; mean age 67.7+/-8.8 years; 32 men; mean body mass index (BMI) 28+/-3.9] and 49 patients without DM (group 2, with similar demographic and clinical characteristics) were studied with MSCT coronary angiography to exclude the presence of ischaemic coronary artery disease (CAD). Each group comprised 26 patients (53%) with no history of ischaemic coronary disease and 23 patients (47%) with a history of myocardial infarction and/or myocardial revascularisation. Clinical follow-up was performed by analysing correlations between the rate of cumulative cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and myocardial revascularisation), the severity of CAD identified on MSCT, and the presence of DM as a cardiovascular risk factor.
RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 20 months, univariate analysis of survival showed significant differences between the two groups (group 1 vs. group 2, p=0.046). Moreover, the cumulative cardiac event rate correlated significantly with the presence of significant CAD (>50% stenosis) in both groups (group 1: p=0.003; group 2: p=0.0004).
CONCLUSIONS: Event-free survival is significantly lower in the diabetic population compared with the normal control population (p=0.046) and is closely correlated with the presence of significant CAD. MSCT is an effective method for stratifying such risk and, together with high diagnostic accuracy, provides additional prognostic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18478189     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-008-0268-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  28 in total

1.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Introduction to coronary imaging with 64-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Giuseppe Runza; Manuel Belgrano; Giacomo Luccichenti; Nico R Mollet; Patrizia Malagutti; Marco Silvestrini; Massimo Midiri; Maria Cova; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli; Gabriel P Krestin
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Francesca Pugliese; Nico R A Mollet; Giuseppe Runza; Carlos van Mieghem; Willem B Meijboom; Patrizia Malagutti; Timo Baks; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J deFeyter; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Lauro Cortigiani; Riccardo Bigi; Rosa Sicari; Patrizia Landi; Francesco Bovenzi; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Diabetes mellitus: a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. A joint editorial statement by the American Diabetes Association; The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; The Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International; The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; and The American Heart Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Value of coronary artery calcium scanning by computed tomography for predicting coronary heart disease in diabetic subjects.

Authors:  Wenchun Qu; Thuy T Le; Stanley P Azen; Min Xiang; Nathan D Wong; Terence M Doherty; Robert C Detrano
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Reliability of differentiating human coronary plaque morphology using contrast-enhanced multislice spiral computed tomography: a comparison with histology.

Authors:  Stephen Schroeder; Axel Kuettner; Martin Leitritz; Jan Janzen; Andreas F Kopp; Christian Herdeg; Martin Heuschmid; Christof Burgstahler; Andreas Baumbach; Manfred Wehrmann; Claus D Claussen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 8.  Assessing prognosis in patients with diabetes mellitus--the Achilles' heel of cardiac stress imaging tests?

Authors:  Masoor Kamalesh; Harvey Feigenbaum; Stephen Sawada
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with diabetes mellitus: enhanced prognostic prediction using a simple risk score.

Authors:  Nithima Chaowalit; Ana Lucia Arruda; Robert B McCully; Kent R Bailey; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S M Haffner; S Lehto; T Rönnemaa; K Pyörälä; M Laakso
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-07-23       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  11 in total

1.  Prognostic value of CT coronary angiography: focus on obstructive vs. nonobstructive disease and on the presence of left main disease.

Authors:  E Maffei; S Seitun; C Martini; A Aldrovandi; T Arcadi; A Clemente; G Messalli; R Malagò; A Weustink; N Mollet; K Nieman; D Ardissino; P de Feyter; G Krestin; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Low dose CT of the heart: a quantum leap into a new era of cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  E Maffei; C Martini; S De Crescenzo; T Arcadi; A Clemente; E Capuano; A Rossi; R Malagò; N Mollet; A Weustink; C Tedeschi; L La Grutta; S Seitun; A Igoren Guaricci; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with chest pain of suspected cardiac origin.

Authors:  E Maffei; S Seitun; C Martini; A Aldrovandi; G Cervellin; C Tedeschi; A Guaricci; G Messalli; O Catalano; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Prognosis and coronary computed tomographic angiography: current and emerging concepts.

Authors:  Kirsten O Healy; Kelly Axsom; James K Min
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Computed tomography coronary angiography in the selection of outlier patients: a feasibility report.

Authors:  E Maffei; C Martini; S Seitun; T Arcadi; C Tedeschi; A Guaricci; R Malagò; G Tarantini; A Aldrovandi; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Left ventricular ejection fraction: real-world comparison between cardiac computed tomography and echocardiography in a large population.

Authors:  E Maffei; G Messalli; A Palumbo; C Martini; S Seitun; A Aldrovandi; A Cuttone; E Emiliano; R Malagò; A Weustink; N Mollet; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Prognostic value of Morise clinical score, calcium score and computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  E Maffei; S Seitun; A Palumbo; C Martini; E Emiliano; A Cuttone; A Aldrovandi; R Malagò; L La Grutta; M Midiri; C Tedeschi; R De Rosa; O Catalano; A Weustink; N Mollet; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Comparison between different kernel reformatting filters in 3D quantitative analysis of MDCT coronary angiography.

Authors:  R Malagò; A Pezzato; C Barbiani; W Mantovani; G Caliari; U Alfonsi; D Tavella; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Rationale, design and methods of CTCA-PRORECAD (Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Prognostic Registry for Coronary Artery Disease): a multicentre and multivendor registry.

Authors:  E Maffei; M Midiri; V Russo; M Rengo; C Tedeschi; P Spagnolo; S Seitun; M Francone; A I Guaricci; N Carrabba; R Malagò; A Cuocolo; T Arcadi; O A Catalano; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Daniele Andreini; Gianluca Pontone; Antonio L Bartorelli; Piergiuseppe Agostoni; Saima Mushtaq; Laura Antonioli; Sarah Cortinovis; Mauro Canestrari; Andrea Annoni; Giovanni Ballerini; Cesare Fiorentini; Mauro Pepi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 9.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.