OBJECTIVE: The South Bay Heart Watch is a cohort study designed to determine the significance of coronary calcium in high-risk asymptomatic patients. This is a report of the relative risk (RR) for outcomes of coronary artery calcium in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 1312 diabetic and nondiabetic subjects underwent risk factor screening and computed tomography testing for coronary calcium at baseline and were followed clinically for 6.3 +/- 1.4 years. End points were either 1). hard events of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary death or 2). any cardiovascular event (nonfatal MI, coronary death, coronary revascularization, or stroke). RESULTS: The incidence rates of a hard event and any cardiovascular event for diabetic and nondiabetic subjects were 14.5 and 6.1% and 23.8 and 12.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). Cox regression analyses of the combined risk relationship of diabetes status and calcium score demonstrated that relative to nondiabetic subjects with low calcium scores (<2.8), diabetic subjects with calcium scores >or=2.8 exhibited at least a fourfold increase in the risk of either a hard or any cardiovascular event (P < 0.001). Cox regression analyses conducted separately for nondiabetic and diabetic subjects revealed that coronary calcium score risk groups were significantly associated with events in nondiabetic subjects (RR >or= 2.6, P <or= 0.01), but not in diabetic subjects (RR <or= 1.7, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of coronary heart disease increases with increasing calcium scores and diabetes status. Calcium scores have less prognostic value in diabetic subjects.
OBJECTIVE: The South Bay Heart Watch is a cohort study designed to determine the significance of coronary calcium in high-risk asymptomatic patients. This is a report of the relative risk (RR) for outcomes of coronary artery calcium in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 1312 diabetic and nondiabetic subjects underwent risk factor screening and computed tomography testing for coronary calcium at baseline and were followed clinically for 6.3 +/- 1.4 years. End points were either 1). hard events of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary death or 2). any cardiovascular event (nonfatal MI, coronary death, coronary revascularization, or stroke). RESULTS: The incidence rates of a hard event and any cardiovascular event for diabetic and nondiabetic subjects were 14.5 and 6.1% and 23.8 and 12.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). Cox regression analyses of the combined risk relationship of diabetes status and calcium score demonstrated that relative to nondiabetic subjects with low calcium scores (<2.8), diabetic subjects with calcium scores >or=2.8 exhibited at least a fourfold increase in the risk of either a hard or any cardiovascular event (P < 0.001). Cox regression analyses conducted separately for nondiabetic and diabetic subjects revealed that coronary calcium score risk groups were significantly associated with events in nondiabetic subjects (RR >or= 2.6, P <or= 0.01), but not in diabetic subjects (RR <or= 1.7, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of coronary heart disease increases with increasing calcium scores and diabetes status. Calcium scores have less prognostic value in diabetic subjects.
Authors: C A F Tavares; C H R E Rassi; M G Fahel; B L Wajchenberg; C E Rochitte; A C Lerario Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Matthijs Oudkerk; Arthur E Stillman; Sandra S Halliburton; Willi A Kalender; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Cynthia H McCollough; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Leslee J Shaw; William Stanford; Allen J Taylor; Peter M A van Ooijen; Lewis Wexler; Paolo Raggi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A Kretowski; J E Hokanson; K McFann; G L Kinney; J K Snell-Bergeon; D M Maahs; R P Wadwa; R H Eckel; L G Ogden; S K Garg; J Li; S Cheng; H A Erlich; M Rewers Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2006-06-13 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Kevin A Bybee; John Lee; Richard Markiewicz; Ryan Longmore; A Iain McGhie; James H O'Keefe; Bai-Ling Hsu; Kevin Kennedy; Randall C Thompson; Timothy M Bateman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 5.952