Literature DB >> 18478188

Local staging of penile cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with pharmacologically induced penile erection.

G Petralia1, G Villa, E Scardino, E Zoffoli, G Renne, O de Cobelli, M Bellomi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to compare the local staging of penile cancer by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with pharmacologically induced penile erection (PIPE), with clinical examination and pathology, and to verify whether MRI-PIPE led to changes in treatment planning in our cohort.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with untreated penile cancer underwent local staging by clinical examination and MRI-PIPE obtained by intracavernosal injection of 10 mug prostaglandin E1. Transverse, sagittal and coronal T2-weighted and T1-weighted (before and after intravenous gadolinium injection) images were obtained with a four-channel phased-array coil. Tumours were treated according to stage, as defined by MRI-PIPE and clinical examination. Stage T1 tumours underwent laser ablation and stage T2 or T3 tumours partial or total penectomy.
RESULTS: Twelve penile cancers were squamous cell carcinomas and one was a sarcoma. MRI-PIPE correctly staged 12 out of 13 patients, failing to detect one in situ carcinoma. Clinical examination correctly staged eight out of 13 patients, over-staging two patients (one Tis was over-staged as T1 and one T1 as T2) and under-staging three patients (two T2 as T1 and one T3 as T2).
CONCLUSION: MRI-PIPE performed better than the clinical examination and changed treatment planning in three patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18478188     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-008-0273-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  14 in total

Review 1.  Penile sonography.

Authors:  M Bertolotto; C E Neumaier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the penis.

Authors:  A Vossough; E S Pretorius; E S Siegelman; P Ramchandani; M P Banner
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

3.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of penile cancer.

Authors:  Oliver Kayes; Suks Minhas; Clare Allen; Chris Hare; Alex Freeman; David Ralph
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Advances in the treatment of carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  W Scott McDougal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  MR imaging of the penis.

Authors:  E S Pretorius; E S Siegelman; P Ramchandani; M P Banner
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  Imaging of penile neoplasms.

Authors:  Ajay K Singh; Anuradha Saokar; Peter F Hahn; Mukesh G Harisinghani
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with penile carcinoma.

Authors:  E de Kerviler; P Ollier; F Desgrandchamps; A M Zagdanski; P Attal; P Teillac; J Frija; A Le Duc; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Ultrasound in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis; a useful addition to clinical staging? A comparison of ultrasound with histopathology.

Authors:  S Horenblas; R Kröger; M P Gallee; D W Newling; H van Tinteren
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Normal penile anatomy and abnormal penile conditions: evaluation with MR imaging.

Authors:  H Hricak; M Marotti; T J Gilbert; T F Lue; L H Wetzel; J W McAninch; E A Tanagho
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Penile carcinoma: a challenge for the developing world.

Authors:  Sanjeev Misra; Arun Chaturvedi; Naresh C Misra
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  7 in total

1.  Painful erections secondary to rare epithelioid hemangioma of the penis.

Authors:  Evan Barber; Trustin Domes
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Imaging in primary penile cancer: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Rohit Kochhar; Ben Taylor; Vijay Sangar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Current and future strategies in the diagnosis and management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Samuel M Lawindy; Alejandro R Rodriguez; Simon Horenblas; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-05-30

Review 4.  Surveillance strategies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Simpa S Salami; Jeffrey S Montgomery
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

Review 5.  Penile sparing surgical approaches for primary penile tumors: preserving function and appearance.

Authors:  Adam S Baumgarten; John S Fisher; Samuel M Lawindy; Jonathan G Pavlinec; Rafael E Carrion; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

Review 6.  Recent Advances in the Management of Penile Cancer: A Contemporary Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Carlos E Stecca; Marie Alt; Di Maria Jiang; Peter Chung; Juanita M Crook; Girish S Kulkarni; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2021-01-16

7.  Myiasis associated with penile carcinoma: a new trend in developing countries?

Authors:  Leandro Koifman; Rodrigo Barros; Lucas Schulze; Antonio Augusto Ornellas; Luciano A Favorito
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.