Literature DB >> 18475348

Subcutaneous tissue: to suture or not to suture at cesarean section.

V R Bohman1, L C Gilstrap Iii, S M Ramin, B B Little, R Santos-Ramos, K G Goldaber, J Dax, K J Leveno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The null hypothesis for this investigation was that there was no difference in the frequency of wound disruption between women who had their subcutaneous tissues approximated with suture and those who did not during cesarean section.
METHODS: During alternating months, consecutive women delivered by cesarean section either did (N = 716) or did not (N = 693) have their subcutaneous tissues closed with suture. All data were analyzed using chi square, Student's t-test, Fisher's exact probability test, analysis of variance, or logistic regression.
RESULTS: A 32% decrease in the frequency of wound disruption was observed when subcutaneous tissues were brought into apposition with suture at cesarean section (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Closure of Scarpa's and Camper's fascia with suture during cesarean section significantly decreased the frequency of wound disruption in this population.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 18475348      PMCID: PMC2364346          DOI: 10.1155/S1064744994000219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1064-7449


  13 in total

1.  Abdominal wound dehiscence.

Authors:  B F Helmkamp
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Development of wound infections among women undergoing cesarean section.

Authors:  S L Emmons; M Krohn; M Jackson; D A Eschenbach
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  A study on the incidence of postoperative infections and surgical sepsis in a university hospital.

Authors:  L Ortona; G Federico; M Fantoni; F Pallavicini; F Ricci; A Antinori
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1987-08

4.  A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds.

Authors:  P J Cruse; R Foord
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1973-08

5.  Mechanical factors in abdominal wound closure: the prevention of fascial dehiscence.

Authors:  G V Poole
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Guidelines for prevention of surgical wound infection.

Authors:  H C Polk; C J Simpson; B P Simmons; J W Alexander
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1983-10

7.  Surgical wound infections. A 5-year prospective study of 20,193 wounds at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center.

Authors:  M Olson; M O'Connor; M L Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A case-control study of wound abscess after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  R S Gibbs; J D Blanco; P J St Clair
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds.

Authors:  P J Cruse; R Foord
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Grading body fatness from limited anthropometric data.

Authors:  A F Roche; R M Sievogel; W C Chumlea; P Webb
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  2 in total

1.  A phase II trial of a surgical protocol to decrease the incidence of wound complications in obese gynecologic oncology patients.

Authors:  Akiva P Novetsky; Israel Zighelboim; Saketh R Guntupalli; Yevgeniya J M Ioffe; Nora T Kizer; Andrea R Hagemann; Matthew A Powell; Premal H Thaker; David G Mutch; L Stewart Massad
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  DIEAP Flap Patients Equally as Satisfied with the Abdomen as Abdominoplasty Patients.

Authors:  Christoffer Aam Ingvaldsen; Tyge Tind Tindholdt; Kim Alexander Tønseth
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-08-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.