Literature DB >> 18474538

Safety of myocardial flash-contrast echocardiography in combination with dobutamine stress testing for the detection of ischaemia in 5250 studies.

C Aggeli1, G Giannopoulos, G Roussakis, E Christoforatou, G Marinos, C Toli, C Pitsavos, C Stefanadis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to provide evidence regarding the safety of real-time flash-contrast echocardiography combined with dobutamine-atropine stress echo (DASE).
BACKGROUND: The combination of perfusion assessment using myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) with DASE has shown very promising results for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Concerns have, however, been expressed regarding the safety of the use of echo-contrast agents in echocardiography.
DESIGN: 5250 individuals (70.8% men, aged 64.6 years (SD 10.6)) were submitted to DASE, with concurrent MCE using a low mechanical index technique with the administration of high-energy impulses in order to assess replenishment time.
RESULTS: No deaths or myocardial infarctions were observed. Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation requiring resuscitation occurred in two cases (0.04%). The incidence of other arrhythmic events was: sustained VT not requiring resuscitation, 10 (0.18%); non-sustained VT, 18 (0.34%); atrial tachycardia, 4 (0.08%); atrial fibrillation, 25 (0.48%). Other observed adverse events included: intense headache, 52 (1%); intense back pain, 26 (0.5%). Vagal reactions with marked systolic blood pressure falls were observed in 45 cases (0.9%). Hypersensitivity reactions were reported in 23 cases (0.44%), although no serious cases of hypersensitivity requiring hospitalisation were recorded. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of DASE/MCE were 92%, 61% and 85%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This report of safety data regarding stress-contrast echocardiography in a large series of subjects suggests that this is an exceptionally safe technique, given that in 5250 studies no study-related deaths or myocardial infarctions were encountered, whereas serious adverse events requiring hospitalisation were extremely rare (one in 2625 studies).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18474538     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.135145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  13 in total

1.  Quantification of Microvascular Tortuosity during Tumor Evolution Using Acoustic Angiography.

Authors:  Sarah E Shelton; Yueh Z Lee; Mike Lee; Emmanuel Cherin; F Stuart Foster; Stephen R Aylward; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Contrast echocardiography: an update.

Authors:  Rajesh K Chelliah; Roxy Senior
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Contrast echocardiography for detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities : A clinical perspective.

Authors:  N Karogiannis; R Senior
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Transcranial contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid in semiquantitative evaluation of brain perfusion.

Authors:  Kozue Saito; Toshiko Hirai; Satoshi Ueno
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  On the relationship between microbubble fragmentation, deflation and broadband superharmonic signal production.

Authors:  Brooks D Lindsey; Juan D Rojas; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Stress echocardiography with contrast for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-06-01

7.  Parallel imaging and dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atypical chest pain or equivocal ECG not suitable for stress echocardiography.

Authors:  E Di Cesare; S Battisti; A Riva; C Corbacelli; G De Bernardinis; S Cicogna; C Masciocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver: technical and lexicon recommendations from the ACR CEUS LI-RADS working group.

Authors:  Andrej Lyshchik; Yuko Kono; Christoph F Dietrich; Hyun-Jung Jang; Tae Kyoung Kim; Fabio Piscaglia; Alexander Vezeridis; Juergen K Willmann; Stephanie R Wilson
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-04

9.  Safety of Perflutren Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Disproportionality Analysis of the US FAERS Database.

Authors:  Manfred Hauben; Eric Y Hung; Kelly C Hanretta; Sripal Bangalore; Vincenza Snow
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Renal retention of lipid microbubbles: a potential mechanism for flank discomfort during ultrasound contrast administration.

Authors:  Ya Ni Liu; Jaspreet Khangura; Aris Xie; J Todd Belcik; Yue Qi; Brian P Davidson; Yan Zhao; Sajeevani Kim; Yoichi Inaba; Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.