Literature DB >> 18471665

Lottery incentives did not improve response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized controlled trial.

Ian A Harris1, Oliver K Khoo, Jane M Young, Michael J Solomon, Hamish Rae.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to examine the effect of an instant lottery ticket incentive on the response rate to a mailed questionnaire in a population of trauma patients. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: A randomized controlled trial at a major trauma center with 728 patients randomized into 2 groups prior to mailing of a questionnaire. One group of patients (Group A) had a sentence inserted into the cover letter stating that they would receive a $4 instant lottery ticket upon receipt of a completed questionnaire; Group B did not have an incentive. The response rate for both groups was measured after the initial mailing and at the end of the study. The results were analyzed using the X2 test to compare 2 proportions and a P value of .05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: The early response rate in Group A was lower than in Group B, and the response rates for both groups were similar at final follow-up. The differences at both time periods were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The use of an instant lottery ticket incentive did not improve the response rate to a mailed questionnaire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18471665     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  8 in total

1.  Lottery-based versus fixed incentives to increase clinicians' response to surveys.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Rachel Kohn; Aaron Dornbrand-Lo; Thomas Metkus; David A Asch; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Can incentives undermine intrinsic motivation to participate in epidemiologic surveys?

Authors:  Marika Wenemark; Asa Vernby; Annika Lindahl Norberg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Assessing corporate social responsibility in China's sports lottery administration and its influence on consumption behavior.

Authors:  Hai Li; James J Zhang; Luke Lunhua Mao; Sophia D Min
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2012-09

4.  Patient-assessed satisfaction and outcome after microsurgical resection of cavernomas causing epilepsy.

Authors:  Jamie J Van Gompel; W Richard Marsh; Fredric B Meyer; Gregory A Worrell
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Improving response rate and quality of survey data with a scratch lottery ticket incentive.

Authors:  Frank Olsen; Birgit Abelsen; Jan Abel Olsen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  The effects of tracking responses and the day of mailing on physician survey response rate: three randomized trials.

Authors:  Elie A Akl; Swarna Gaddam; Reem Mustafa; Mark C Wilson; Andrew Symons; Ann Grifasi; Denise McGuigan; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Behavioral economics implementation: Regret lottery improves mHealth patient study adherence.

Authors:  S Ali Husain; Keith Diaz; Joseph E Schwartz; Faith E Parsons; Matthew M Burg; Karina W Davidson; Ian M Kronish
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-05-31

Review 8.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.