Literature DB >> 18471602

Overview of formative, process, and outcome evaluation methods used in the VERB campaign.

Judy M Berkowitz1, Marian Huhman, Carrie D Heitzler, Lance D Potter, Mary Jo Nolin, Stephen W Banspach.   

Abstract

Evaluation was an integral part of the VERB campaign. This paper describes the array of evaluation methods used to support the development, implementation, and assessment of campaign activities. The evaluation of VERB consisted of formative, process, and outcome evaluations and involved both qualitative and quantitative methods. Formative evaluation allowed staff to test ideas for messages and to gauge their appropriateness for the intended audiences. Process evaluation allowed staff to test and monitor the fidelity of the campaign's implementation to objectives and to make changes while the campaign was under way. Outcome evaluation allowed staff to determine the campaign's effects on the target audience. Because a comprehensive approach was used, which included formative and process evaluation, the VERB team's ability to interpret the results of the outcome evaluation was enhanced.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18471602     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  7 in total

1.  The Influence of the VERB campaign on children's physical activity in 2002 to 2006.

Authors:  Marian E Huhman; Lance D Potter; Mary Jo Nolin; Andrea Piesse; David R Judkins; Stephen W Banspach; Faye L Wong
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Social Marketing as a Framework for Youth Physical Activity Initiatives: a 10-Year Retrospective on the Legacy of CDC's VERB Campaign.

Authors:  Marian Huhman; Ryan P Kelly; Timothy Edgar
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-06

3.  CDC MessageWorks: Designing and Validating a Social Marketing Tool to Craft and Defend Effective Messages.

Authors:  Galen E Cole; Punam A Keller; Jennifer Reynolds; Michelle Schaur; Diane Krause
Journal:  Soc Mar Q       Date:  2015-11-18

4.  Formative process evaluation for implementing a social marketing intervention to increase walking among African Americans in the Positive Action for Today's Health trial.

Authors:  Sandra M Coulon; Dawn K Wilson; Sarah Griffin; Sara M St George; Kassandra A Alia; Nevelyn N Trumpeter; Abraham K Wandersman; Melinda Forthofer; Shamika Robinson; Barney Gadson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  A formative evaluation of social media campaign to reduce adolescent dating violence.

Authors:  Danielle N Lambert; Lauren E Bishop; Stephanie Guetig; Paula M Frew
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2014-11-12

6.  Formative evaluation of a portion control and calorie reduction campaign: Insights from focus groups with target audience.

Authors:  Sarah Gonzalez-Nahm; Meghan L Ames; Sara E Benjamin-Neelon
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-10-25

7.  Effectiveness of 'Mois sans tabac 2016': A French social marketing campaign against smoking.

Authors:  Romain Guignard; Raphaël Andler; Jean-Baptiste Richard; Anne Pasquereau; Guillemette Quatremère; Pierre Arwidson; Karine Gallopel-Morvan; Viêt Nguyen-Thanh
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.600

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.