Literature DB >> 18471034

Second-line and third-line chemotherapy for lung cancer: use and cost.

Scott D Ramsey1, Renato G Martins, David K Blough, Lauri S Tock, Deborah Lubeck, Carolina M Reyes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify commonly prescribed first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy regimens for persons with lung cancer and to evaluate the utilization patterns and costs of care associated with receiving these regimens. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis.
METHODS: Using health insurance claims from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2006, patients with lung cancer were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes. An algorithm was developed to identify first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by the number of discrete regimens received or by their specific chemotherapy agent or combination of agents. Data were analyzed for up to 2 years from the date of the initial first-line regimen and for 1 year from the second and third lines. Patient costs were based on total reimbursements for each group during the observation period.
RESULTS: Of patients receiving first-line chemotherapy, 25% and 10% received second-line and third-line chemotherapy, respectively. Docetaxel, gefitinib, and erlotinib hydrochloride were the most commonly prescribed second-line regimens; gefitinib and docetaxel were the most commonly prescribed third-line regimens. The most commonly prescribed second- and third-line agents changed substantially over time. Total costs and costs per patient per month increased as the number of lines of chemotherapy prescribed increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Second- and third-line chemotherapy is prescribed infrequently, and patterns of prescribing are changing over time. Direct medical care costs increase substantially with additional lines of therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18471034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  13 in total

1.  Impact of new drugs and biologics on colorectal cancer treatment and costs.

Authors:  Pinar Karaca-Mandic; Jeffrey S McCullough; Mustaqeem A Siddiqui; Holly Van Houten; Nilay D Shah
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Erlotinib (tarceva) for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Caio M Rocha-Lima; Luis E Raez
Journal:  P T       Date:  2009-10

Review 3.  How affordable are targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Linda E Coate; Natasha B Leighl
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-03

4.  Algorithm to Identify Systemic Cancer Therapy Treatment Using Structured Electronic Data.

Authors:  Nikki M Carroll; Kate M Burniece; Jeff Holzman; Deanna B McQuillan; Angela Plata; Debra P Ritzwoller
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2017-11

5.  ReCAP: Hospitalizations in Older Adults With Advanced Cancer: The Role of Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Caitriona B O'Neill; Coral L Atoria; Eileen M O'Reilly; Martin C Henman; Peter B Bach; Elena B Elkin; Caitriona B O'Neill; Coral L Atoria; Eileen M O'Reilly; Martin C Henman; Peter B Bach; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Utilization Patterns and Trends in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Testing Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Chan Shen; Kenneth L Kehl; Bo Zhao; George R Simon; Shouhao Zhou; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Erlotinib: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Accuracy and complexities of using automated clinical data for capturing chemotherapy administrations: implications for future research.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Leah Tuzzio; Debra P Ritzwoller; Andrew E Williams; Tyler Ross; Edward H Wagner; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Andrea Altschuler; Virginia Quinn; Mark Hornbrook; Larissa Nekhlyudov
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Vinorelbine and gemcitabine vs vinorelbine and carboplatin as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. A phase III randomised controlled trial by the Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Ø Fløtten; B H Grønberg; R Bremnes; T Amundsen; S Sundstrøm; H Rolke; K Hornslien; T Wentzel-Larsen; U Aasebø; C von Plessen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Use of electronic medical records (EMR) for oncology outcomes research: assessing the comparability of EMR information to patient registry and health claims data.

Authors:  Edmund C Lau; Fionna S Mowat; Michael A Kelsh; Jason C Legg; Nicole M Engel-Nitz; Heather N Watson; Helen L Collins; Robert J Nordyke; Joanna L Whyte
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.