OBJECTIVES: To identify commonly prescribed first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy regimens for persons with lung cancer and to evaluate the utilization patterns and costs of care associated with receiving these regimens. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. METHODS: Using health insurance claims from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2006, patients with lung cancer were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes. An algorithm was developed to identify first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by the number of discrete regimens received or by their specific chemotherapy agent or combination of agents. Data were analyzed for up to 2 years from the date of the initial first-line regimen and for 1 year from the second and third lines. Patient costs were based on total reimbursements for each group during the observation period. RESULTS: Of patients receiving first-line chemotherapy, 25% and 10% received second-line and third-line chemotherapy, respectively. Docetaxel, gefitinib, and erlotinib hydrochloride were the most commonly prescribed second-line regimens; gefitinib and docetaxel were the most commonly prescribed third-line regimens. The most commonly prescribed second- and third-line agents changed substantially over time. Total costs and costs per patient per month increased as the number of lines of chemotherapy prescribed increased. CONCLUSIONS: Second- and third-line chemotherapy is prescribed infrequently, and patterns of prescribing are changing over time. Direct medical care costs increase substantially with additional lines of therapy.
OBJECTIVES: To identify commonly prescribed first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy regimens for persons with lung cancer and to evaluate the utilization patterns and costs of care associated with receiving these regimens. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. METHODS: Using health insurance claims from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2006, patients with lung cancer were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes. An algorithm was developed to identify first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by the number of discrete regimens received or by their specific chemotherapy agent or combination of agents. Data were analyzed for up to 2 years from the date of the initial first-line regimen and for 1 year from the second and third lines. Patient costs were based on total reimbursements for each group during the observation period. RESULTS: Of patients receiving first-line chemotherapy, 25% and 10% received second-line and third-line chemotherapy, respectively. Docetaxel, gefitinib, and erlotinib hydrochloride were the most commonly prescribed second-line regimens; gefitinib and docetaxel were the most commonly prescribed third-line regimens. The most commonly prescribed second- and third-line agents changed substantially over time. Total costs and costs per patient per month increased as the number of lines of chemotherapy prescribed increased. CONCLUSIONS: Second- and third-line chemotherapy is prescribed infrequently, and patterns of prescribing are changing over time. Direct medical care costs increase substantially with additional lines of therapy.
Authors: Pinar Karaca-Mandic; Jeffrey S McCullough; Mustaqeem A Siddiqui; Holly Van Houten; Nilay D Shah Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Nikki M Carroll; Kate M Burniece; Jeff Holzman; Deanna B McQuillan; Angela Plata; Debra P Ritzwoller Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2017-11
Authors: Caitriona B O'Neill; Coral L Atoria; Eileen M O'Reilly; Martin C Henman; Peter B Bach; Elena B Elkin; Caitriona B O'Neill; Coral L Atoria; Eileen M O'Reilly; Martin C Henman; Peter B Bach; Elena B Elkin Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Chan Shen; Kenneth L Kehl; Bo Zhao; George R Simon; Shouhao Zhou; Sharon H Giordano Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Erin J Aiello Bowles; Leah Tuzzio; Debra P Ritzwoller; Andrew E Williams; Tyler Ross; Edward H Wagner; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Andrea Altschuler; Virginia Quinn; Mark Hornbrook; Larissa Nekhlyudov Journal: Med Care Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Ø Fløtten; B H Grønberg; R Bremnes; T Amundsen; S Sundstrøm; H Rolke; K Hornslien; T Wentzel-Larsen; U Aasebø; C von Plessen Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Edmund C Lau; Fionna S Mowat; Michael A Kelsh; Jason C Legg; Nicole M Engel-Nitz; Heather N Watson; Helen L Collins; Robert J Nordyke; Joanna L Whyte Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 4.790