Literature DB >> 18469042

Technical note: Occurrence in fecal microbiota of genes conferring resistance to both macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B and tetracyclines concomitant with feeding of beef cattle with tylosin.

J Chen1, F L Fluharty, N St-Pierre, M Morrison, Z Yu.   

Abstract

Development of antimicrobial resistance in food animals receiving antimicrobials has been well documented among bacterial isolates, especially pathogens, but information on development of antimicrobial resistance at the microbial community level during long-term feeding of antimicrobials is lacking. The objective of this study was to examine the association between inclusion of tylosin in feed and occurrence of resistance to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLS(B)) in the entire fecal microbial communities of beef cattle over a feeding study of 168 d. A completely randomized design included 6 pens housed together in 1 barn, with each pen housing 10 to 11 steers. The control and tylosin groups each had 3 pens, with the former receiving no antimicrobial whereas the latter received both tylosin and monensin (11 and 29.9 mg/ kg of feed, respectively, DM) in feed. The abundance of genes conferring resistance to MLS(B) (erm genes) and tetracyclines (tet genes) were quantified using class-specific, real-time PCR assays. The abundances of erm and tet genes were analyzed with pens as experimental units using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Correlations between abundance of different resistance genes were calculated using the CORR procedure of SAS. We identified 4 classes (B, F, T, and X) of erm genes in fresh fecal samples collected at wk 2, 17, and 21 of feeding. From wk 2 to 17, the abundance of erm(T) and erm(X) increased (P < 0.05), whereas that of erm(B) and erm(F) did not. The abundance of the erm genes did not further change from wk 17 to 21. The tet(A/C), tet(G), and tet gene variants encoding ribosomal protection proteins (including classes M, O, P, Q, S, T, and W) appeared to be co-selected by tylosin feeding. Such co-selection of multiresistance at community level by one antimicrobial drug used in animals has the important implication that future studies should examine resistance to not only the antimicrobials used in animals, but also other antimicrobials, especially those used in human medicine, to fully assess the potential risk associated with antimicrobial use in animals. Both the erm and tet genes appeared to be disseminated among the microbial populations in all steers housed together.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18469042     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  15 in total

1.  Molecular ecology of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B methylases in waste lagoons and subsurface waters associated with swine production.

Authors:  Satoshi Koike; Rustam I Aminov; A C Yannarell; Holly D Gans; Ivan G Krapac; Joanne C Chee-Sanford; Roderick I Mackie
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Occurrence and persistence of erythromycin resistance genes (erm) and tetracycline resistance genes (tet) in waste treatment systems on swine farms.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Frederick C Michel; Srinand Sreevatsan; Mark Morrison; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Persistence of resistance to erythromycin and tetracycline in swine manure during simulated composting and lagoon treatments.

Authors:  Lingling Wang; Yukiko Oda; Sukhbir Grewal; Mark Morrison; Frederick C Michel; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Ruminally protected and unprotected Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products as alternatives to antibiotics in finishing beef steers1.

Authors:  Yizhao Shen; Taylor Davedow; Tao Ran; Atef M Saleem; Ilkyu Yoon; Claudia Narvaez; Tim Angus Mcallister; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  The effect of tylosin on antimicrobial resistance in beef cattle enteric bacteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Casey L Cazer; Erin R B Eldermire; Guillaume Lhermie; Sarah A Murray; H Morgan Scott; Yrjö T Gröhn
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.670

6.  Estimation of low quantity genes: a hierarchical model for analyzing censored quantitative real-time PCR data.

Authors:  Tim C Boyer; Tim Hanson; Randall S Singer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Longitudinal characterization of antimicrobial resistance genes in feces shed from cattle fed different subtherapeutic antibiotics.

Authors:  Trevor W Alexander; Jay L Yanke; Tim Reuter; Ed Topp; Ronald R Read; Brent L Selinger; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Effect of in-feed administration and withdrawal of tylosin phosphate on antibiotic resistance in enterococci isolated from feedlot steers.

Authors:  Alicia G Beukers; Rahat Zaheer; Shaun R Cook; Kim Stanford; Alexandre V Chaves; Michael P Ward; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Effect of subtherapeutic vs. therapeutic administration of macrolides on antimicrobial resistance in Mannheimia haemolytica and enterococci isolated from beef cattle.

Authors:  Rahat Zaheer; Shaun R Cook; Cassidy L Klima; Kim Stanford; Trevor Alexander; Edward Topp; Ron R Read; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Effect of Tulathromycin on Colonization Resistance, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Virulence of Human Gut Microbiota in Chemostats.

Authors:  Haihong Hao; Shengxi Zhou; Guyue Cheng; Menghong Dai; Xu Wang; Zhenli Liu; Yulian Wang; Zonghui Yuan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.