Literature DB >> 18468959

Inverse planning simulated annealing for magnetic resonance imaging-based intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Charlotte Dai Kubicky1, Benjamin M Yeh, Etienne Lessard, Bonnie N Joe, Joycelyn L Speight, Jean Pouliot, I-Chow Hsu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a technique using exclusively magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to perform dwell position identification, targets and organs at risk delineation, and to apply inverse planning dose optimization to high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 15 consecutive women treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer. All patients underwent MRI after placement of tandem and ring applicator containing a gadodiamide-filled dummy marker. This technique allowed direct visualization of the source pathway and precise definition of the intra-applicator source positions. For each patient, we delineated gross target volume (GTV), high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and organs at risk on MRI, according to the European Gynecological GEC-ESTRO Working Group definitions. We performed inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA) and analyzed the dose-volume histograms with the following endpoints: D(90), D(100), and V(100) for GTV and HR-CTV; D0.1 cc, D1 cc, D2 cc for bladder, rectum, and bowel; and dose at Point A.
RESULTS: The intra-applicator source pathway was easily visualized on MRI using the gadodiamide-filled marker. IPSA provided excellent target coverage. The mean D(90) and V(100) for HR-CTV were 103+/-5% and 92+/-3%, respectively. IPSA provided excellent bladder sparing. D1 cc and D2 cc of bladder were 73+/-10% and 67+/-10%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed a novel technique that allows direct visualization of the intra-applicator source pathway on MRI. Using this technique, we successfully performed inverse planning directly from MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18468959     DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2008.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brachytherapy        ISSN: 1538-4721            Impact factor:   2.362


  5 in total

1.  A detailed dosimetric comparison between manual and inverse plans in HDR intracavitary/interstitial cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Petra Trnková; Dimos Baltas; Andreas Karabis; Markus Stock; Johannes Dimopoulos; Dietmar Georg; Richard Pötter; Christian Kirisits
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-01-14

2.  Does help structures play a role in reducing the variation of dwell time in IPSA planning for gynaecological brachytherapy application?

Authors:  Swamidas Jamema; Umesh Mahantshetty; Dd Deshpande; Smriti Sharma; Sk Shrivastava
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-09-30

Review 3.  Review of clinical brachytherapy uncertainties: analysis guidelines of GEC-ESTRO and the AAPM.

Authors:  Christian Kirisits; Mark J Rivard; Dimos Baltas; Facundo Ballester; Marisol De Brabandere; Rob van der Laarse; Yury Niatsetski; Panagiotis Papagiannis; Taran Paulsen Hellebust; Jose Perez-Calatayud; Kari Tanderup; Jack L M Venselaar; Frank-André Siebert
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Commissioning of a 3D image-based treatment planning system for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yongbok Kim; Joseph M Modrick; Edward C Pennington; Yusung Kim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Qi Fu; Yingjie Xu; Jing Zuo; Jusheng An; Manni Huang; Xi Yang; Jiayun Chen; Hui Yan; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.