Literature DB >> 18467298

Cuckoo-hawk mimicry? An experimental test.

N B Davies1, J A Welbergen.   

Abstract

The similarity between many Old World parasitic cuckoos (Cuculinae) and Accipiter hawks, in size, shape and plumage, has been noted since ancient times. In particular, hawk-like underpart barring is more prevalent in parasitic than in non-parasitic cuckoos. Cuckoo-hawk resemblance may reflect convergent evolution of cryptic plumage that reduces detection by hosts and prey, or evolved mimicry of hawks by parasitic cuckoos, either for protection against hawk attacks or to facilitate brood parasitism by influencing host behaviour. Here, we provide the first evidence that some small birds respond to common cuckoos Cuculus canorus as if they were sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus. Great tits and blue tits were equally alarmed and reduced attendance at feeders during and after the presentation of mounted specimens of common cuckoos and sparrowhawks, but not in response to control presentations of collared doves or teal. Plumage manipulations revealed that the strong alarm response to cuckoos depended on their resemblance to hawks; cuckoos with barred underparts were treated like hawks, while those with unbarred underparts were treated like doves. However, barring was not the only feature inducing alarm because tits showed similarly strong alarm to barred and unbarred hawks, and little alarm to barred doves. These responses of tits, unsuitable as hosts and hence with no history of cuckoo parasitism, suggest that naive small birds can mistake cuckoos for hawks. Thus, any cuckoo-hawk discrimination by host species is likely to be an evolved response to brood parasitism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18467298      PMCID: PMC2587796          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  3 in total

1.  The evolution of sexual dimorphism in parasitic cuckoos: sexual selection or coevolution?

Authors:  O Krüger; N B Davies; M D Sorenson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Fat reserves and perceived predation risk in the great tit, Parus major.

Authors:  L K Gentle; A G Gosler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Aggressive mimics profit from a model-signal receiver mutualism.

Authors:  Karen L Cheney; Isabelle M Côté
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  3 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Colour, vision and coevolution in avian brood parasitism.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  A review of the cues used for rejecting foreign eggs from the nest by the Eurasian blackbird (Turdus merula).

Authors:  Andrew G Fulmer; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Uncovering dangerous cheats: how do avian hosts recognize adult brood parasites?

Authors:  Alfréd Trnka; Pavol Prokop; Tomáš Grim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evidence for aggressive mimicry in an adult brood parasitic bird, and generalized defences in its host.

Authors:  W E Feeney; J Troscianko; N E Langmore; C N Spottiswoode
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Visual discrimination of polymorphic nestlings in a cuckoo-host system.

Authors:  Alfredo Attisano; Nozomu J Sato; Keita D Tanaka; Yuji Okahisa; Ralph Kuehn; Roman Gula; Keisuke Ueda; Jörn Theuerkauf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Differently sized cuckoos pose different threats to hosts.

Authors:  Jiangping Yu; Mingju E; Wei Sun; Wei Liang; Haitao Wang; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.624

7.  Color plumage polymorphism and predator mimicry in brood parasites.

Authors:  Alfréd Trnka; Tomáš Grim
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Egg rejection in blackbirds Turdus merula: a by-product of conspecific parasitism or successful resistance against interspecific brood parasites?

Authors:  Francisco Ruiz-Raya; Manuel Soler; Gianluca Roncalli; Teresa Abaurrea; Juan Diego Ibáñez-Álamo
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Sparrowhawk movement, calling, and presence of dead conspecifics differentially impact blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) vocal and behavioral mobbing responses.

Authors:  Nora V Carlson; Helen M Pargeter; Christopher N Templeton
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-08-13       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Heterospecific alarm-call recognition in two warbler hosts of common cuckoos.

Authors:  Jiangping Yu; Hailin Lu; Wei Sun; Wei Liang; Haitao Wang; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.