Literature DB >> 17439849

The evolution of sexual dimorphism in parasitic cuckoos: sexual selection or coevolution?

O Krüger1, N B Davies, M D Sorenson.   

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism is ubiquitous in animals and can result from selection pressure on one or both sexes. Sexual selection has become the predominant explanation for the evolution of sexual dimorphism, with strong selection on size-related mating success in males being the most common situation. The cuckoos (family Cuculidae) provide an exceptional case in which both sexes of many species are freed from the burden of parental care but where coevolution between parasitic cuckoos and their hosts also results in intense selection. Here, we show that size and plumage differences between the sexes in parasitic cuckoos are more likely the result of coevolution than sexual selection. While both sexes changed in size as brood parasitism evolved, we find no evidence for selection on males to become larger. Rather, our analysis indicates stronger selection on parasitic females to become smaller, resulting in a shift from dimorphism with larger females in cuckoos with parental care to dimorphism with larger males in parasitic species. In addition, the evolution of brood parasitism was associated with more cryptic plumage in both sexes, but especially in females, a result that contrasts with the strong plumage dimorphism seen in some other parasitic birds. Examination of the three independent origins of brood parasitism suggests that different parasitic cuckoo lineages followed divergent evolutionary pathways to successful brood parasitism. These results argue for the powerful role of parasite-host coevolution in shaping cuckoo life histories in general and sexual dimorphism in particular.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17439849      PMCID: PMC2211511          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

1.  Evolutionary biology: the tale of the parasitic cuckoos.

Authors:  Arie J van Noordwijk
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution.

Authors:  M Pagel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Comparative analyses of the influence of developmental mode on phenotypic diversification rates in shorebirds.

Authors:  Gavin H Thomas; Robert P Freckleton; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The evolution of cuckoo parasitism: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  O Krüger; N B Davies
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  R Shine
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.875

6.  Obligate brood parasites as selective agents for evolution of egg appearance in passerine birds.

Authors:  Bard G Stokke; Arne Moksnes; Eivin Røskaft
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Molecular genetic perspectives on avian brood parasitism.

Authors:  Michael D Sorenson; Robert B Payne
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing two hypotheses for Rensch's rule in the water strider Aquarius remigis.

Authors:  Daphne J Fairbairn
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 9.  Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints.

Authors:  Oliver Krüger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Host-race formation in the common cuckoo

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Coevolution is linked with phenotypic diversification but not speciation in avian brood parasites.

Authors:  Iliana Medina; Naomi E Langmore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Brood parasitism selects for no defence in a cuckoo host.

Authors:  Oliver Krüger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Cuckoo-hawk mimicry? An experimental test.

Authors:  N B Davies; J A Welbergen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sex allocation in relation to host races in the brood-parasitic common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus).

Authors:  Frode Fossøy; Arne Moksnes; Eivin Røskaft; Anton Antonov; Andrzej Dyrcz; Csaba Moskat; Peter S Ranke; Jarkko Rutila; Johan R Vikan; Bård G Stokke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does coevolution promote species richness in parasitic cuckoos?

Authors:  Oliver Krüger; Michael D Sorenson; Nicholas B Davies
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Color plumage polymorphism and predator mimicry in brood parasites.

Authors:  Alfréd Trnka; Tomáš Grim
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.