Literature DB >> 18466275

Functional imaging of stroke recovery: an ecological review from a neural network perspective with an emphasis on motor systems.

Jon Erik Ween1.   

Abstract

Functional imaging is beginning to outline the brain's functional architecture and mechanisms of recovery from injury. I will review primarily the motor-function literature from normal populations, learning trials, stroke recovery, and rehabilitation with a neural network approach that may prove fruitful in further advancing our understanding of brain plasticity in response to focal lesions. A key consideration in this review will be how the development of distributed motor networks might constrain recovery as a function of the altered connectivity between damaged and nondamaged areas. It will be argued that this connectivity is central to both recovery from injury and response to treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18466275     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2007.00180.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimaging        ISSN: 1051-2284            Impact factor:   2.486


  10 in total

1.  Modulation of large-scale brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation evidenced by resting-state functional MRI.

Authors:  Cleofé Peña-Gómez; Roser Sala-Lonch; Carme Junqué; Immaculada C Clemente; Dídac Vidal; Núria Bargalló; Carles Falcón; Josep Valls-Solé; Álvaro Pascual-Leone; David Bartrés-Faz
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 2.  Exploration and modulation of brain network interactions with noninvasive brain stimulation in combination with neuroimaging.

Authors:  Mouhsin M Shafi; M Brandon Westover; Michael D Fox; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Hallucinations as top-down effects on perception.

Authors:  Albert R Powers; Megan Kelley; Philip R Corlett
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-09

4.  An extended motor network generates beta and gamma oscillatory perturbations during development.

Authors:  Tony W Wilson; Erin Slason; Ryan Asherin; Eugene Kronberg; Martin L Reite; Peter D Teale; Donald C Rojas
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Longitudinal Electroencephalography Analysis in Subacute Stroke Patients During Intervention of Brain-Computer Interface With Exoskeleton Feedback.

Authors:  Shugeng Chen; Lei Cao; Xiaokang Shu; Hewei Wang; Li Ding; Shui-Hua Wang; Jie Jia
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  White matter reorganization and functional response after focal cerebral ischemia in the rat.

Authors:  Chrystelle Po; Daniel Kalthoff; Young Beom Kim; Melanie Nelles; Mathias Hoehn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Identifying abnormal connectivity in patients using dynamic causal modeling of FMRI responses.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier; Peter Zeidman; Nicholas H Neufeld; Alex P Leff; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-26

Review 8.  Finding the Intersection of Neuroplasticity, Stroke Recovery, and Learning: Scope and Contributions to Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Leeanne Carey; Alistair Walsh; Achini Adikari; Peter Goodin; Damminda Alahakoon; Daswin De Silva; Kok-Leong Ong; Michael Nilsson; Lara Boyd
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 9.  Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery.

Authors:  Samar M Hatem; Geoffroy Saussez; Margaux Della Faille; Vincent Prist; Xue Zhang; Delphine Dispa; Yannick Bleyenheuft
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Comparison of EEG measurement of upper limb movement in motor imagery training system.

Authors:  Arpa Suwannarat; Setha Pan-Ngum; Pasin Israsena
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.819

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.