Literature DB >> 18465135

Stimulus-dependent oscillations and evoked potentials in chinchilla auditory cortex.

Paul H Delano1, Elizabeth Pavez, Luis Robles, Pedro E Maldonado.   

Abstract

Besides the intensity and frequency of an auditory stimulus, the length of time that precedes the stimulation is an important factor that determines the magnitude of early evoked neural responses in the auditory cortex. Here we used chinchillas to demonstrate that the length of the silent period before the presentation of an auditory stimulus is a critical factor that modifies late oscillatory responses in the auditory cortex. We used tetrodes to record local-field potential (LFP) signals from the left auditory cortex of ten animals while they were stimulated with clicks, tones or noise bursts delivered at different rates and intensity levels. We found that the incidence of oscillatory activity in the auditory cortex of anesthetized chinchillas is dependent on the period of silence before stimulation and on the intensity of the auditory stimulus. In 62.5% of the recordings sites we found stimulus-related oscillations at around 8-20 Hz. Stimulus-induced oscillations were largest and consistent when stimuli were preceded by 5 s of silence and they were absent when preceded by less than 500 ms of silence. These results demonstrate that the period of silence preceding the stimulus presentation and the stimulus intensity are critical factors for the presence of these oscillations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18465135     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-008-0340-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  38 in total

1.  Three distinct auditory areas of cortex (AI, AII, and AAF) defined by optical imaging of intrinsic signals.

Authors:  N Harel; N Mori; S Sawada; R J Mount; R V Harrison
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Differential expression of synaptic and nonsynaptic mechanisms underlying stimulus-induced gamma oscillations in vitro.

Authors:  M A Whittington; H C Doheny; R D Traub; F E LeBeau; E H Buhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.

Authors:  P Fries; J H Reynolds; A E Rorie; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Evoked oscillations in unit recordings from the thalamo-cortical auditory system: an aspect of temporal processing or the reflection of hyperpolarized brain states?

Authors:  Nathalie Cotillon-Williams; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.579

5.  Stimulus induced and spontaneous rhythmic firing of single units in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  J J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence.

Authors:  Pascal Fries
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 7.  The gamma cycle.

Authors:  Pascal Fries; Danko Nikolić; Wolf Singer
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Thalamic modulation of high-frequency oscillating potentials in auditory cortex.

Authors:  D S Barth; K D MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-05       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Repetition rate and signal level effects on neuronal responses to brief tone pulses in cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  D P Phillips; S E Hall; J L Hollett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Comparison of evoked potentials and high-frequency (gamma-band) oscillating potentials in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  M N Franowicz; D S Barth
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  3 in total

1.  The olivocochlear reflex strength and cochlear sensitivity are independently modulated by auditory cortex microstimulation.

Authors:  Constantino D Dragicevic; Cristian Aedo; Alex León; Macarena Bowen; Natalia Jara; Gonzalo Terreros; Luis Robles; Paul H Delano
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-07

2.  Intracortical Microstimulation Modulates Cortical Induced Responses.

Authors:  Mathias Benjamin Voigt; Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Induced cortical responses require developmental sensory experience.

Authors:  Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf; Peter Hubka; Jochen Tillein; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 13.501

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.