Literature DB >> 10725186

Three distinct auditory areas of cortex (AI, AII, and AAF) defined by optical imaging of intrinsic signals.

N Harel1, N Mori, S Sawada, R J Mount, R V Harrison.   

Abstract

Using pure-tone sound stimulation, three separate auditory areas are revealed by optical imaging of intrinsic signals in the temporal cortex of the chinchilla (Chinchilla laniger). These areas correlate with primary auditory cortex (AI) and two secondary areas, AII and the anterior auditory field (AAF). We have distinguished AI on the basis of concurrent single-unit electrophysiological recording; neurons within the AI intrinsic signal region have short (<15 ms) onset-response latencies compared with neurons recorded in AII and the AAF. Within AI, AII, and AAF we have been able to define cochleotopic or tonotopic organization from the differences in intrinsic signal areas evoked by pure tones at octave-spaced frequencies from 500 Hz to 16 kHz. The maps in AI and AII are arranged orthogonal to each other. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10725186     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  14 in total

1.  High-resolution fMRI maps of cortical activation in nonhuman primates: correlation with intrinsic signal optical images.

Authors:  Anna W Roe; Li M Chen
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

2.  Stimulus-dependent oscillations and evoked potentials in chinchilla auditory cortex.

Authors:  Paul H Delano; Elizabeth Pavez; Luis Robles; Pedro E Maldonado
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Stimulus-dependent changes in optical responses of the dorsal cochlear nucleus using voltage-sensitive dye.

Authors:  F G Licari; M Shkoukani; J A Kaltenbach
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  All rodents are not the same: a modern synthesis of cortical organization.

Authors:  Leah Krubitzer; Katharine L Campi; Dylan F Cooke
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  The olivocochlear reflex strength and cochlear sensitivity are independently modulated by auditory cortex microstimulation.

Authors:  Constantino D Dragicevic; Cristian Aedo; Alex León; Macarena Bowen; Natalia Jara; Gonzalo Terreros; Luis Robles; Paul H Delano
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-07

Review 6.  Ultra high resolution fMRI at ultra-high field.

Authors:  Noam Harel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Responses of auditory cortex to complex stimuli: functional organization revealed using intrinsic optical signals.

Authors:  Israel Nelken; Jennifer K Bizley; Fernando R Nodal; Bashir Ahmed; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Theoretical limitations on functional imaging resolution in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Thomas L Chen; Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Response properties of whisker-related neurons in rat second somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Ernest E Kwegyir-Afful; Asaf Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A map of periodicity orthogonal to frequency representation in the cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gerald Langner; Hubert R Dinse; Ben Godde
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.