Literature DB >> 18464987

Structures and interaction energies of stacked graphene-nucleobase complexes.

Jens Antony1, Stefan Grimme.   

Abstract

The noncovalent interactions of nucleobases and hydrogen-bonded (Watson-Crick) base-pairs on graphene are investigated with the DFT-D method, i.e., all-electron density functional theory (DFT) in generalized gradient approximation (GGA) combined with an empirical correction for dispersion (van der Waals) interactions. Full geometry optimization is performed for complexes with graphene sheet models of increasing size (up to C(150)H(30)). Large Gaussian basis sets of at least polarized triple-zeta quality are employed. The interaction energies are extrapolated to infinite lateral size of the sheets. Comparisons are made with B2PLYP-D and SCS-MP2 single point energies for coronene and C(54)H(18) substrates. The contributions to the binding (Pauli exchange repulsion, electrostatic and induction, dispersion) are analyzed. At a frozen inter-fragment distance, the interaction energy surface of the rigid C(96)H(24) and base monomers is explored in three dimensions (two lateral and one rotational). Methodologically and also regarding the results of an energy decomposition analysis, the complexes behave like other pi-stacked systems examined previously. The sequence obtained for the interaction energy of bases with graphene (G > A > T > C > U) is the same for all methods and supports recent experimental findings. The absolute values are rather large (about -20 to -25 kcal mol(-1)) but in the expected range for pi-systems of that size. The relatively short equilibrium inter-plane distance (about 3 A) is consistent with atomic force microscopy results of monolayer guanine and adenine on graphite. In graphene ... Watson-Crick pair complexes, the bases lie differently from their isolated energy minima leading to geometrical anti-cooperativity. Together with an electronic contribution of 2 and 6%, this adds up to total binding anti-cooperativities of 7 and 12% for AT and CG, respectively, on C(96)H(24). Hydrogen bonds themselves are merely affected by binding on graphene.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18464987     DOI: 10.1039/b718788b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  20 in total

1.  Influence of sequential guanidinium methylation on the energetics of the guanidinium...guanine dimer and guanidinium...guanine...cytosine trimer: implications for the control of protein...DNA interactions by arginine methyltransferases.

Authors:  Jason Shearer
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Fast DNA sequencing with a graphene-based nanochannel device.

Authors:  Seung Kyu Min; Woo Youn Kim; Yeonchoo Cho; Kwang S Kim
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  How strong is the edge effect in the adsorption of anticancer drugs on a graphene cluster?

Authors:  Chompoonut Rungnim; Rungroj Chanajaree; Thanyada Rungrotmongkol; Supot Hannongbua; Nawee Kungwan; Peter Wolschann; Alfred Karpfen; Vudhichai Parasuk
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Parameterization of a B3LYP specific correction for non-covalent interactions and basis set superposition error on a gigantic dataset of CCSD(T) quality non-covalent interaction energies.

Authors:  Severin T Schneebeli; Arteum D Bochevarov; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Density functional theory study of π-aromatic interaction of benzene, phenol, catechol, dopamine isolated dimers and adsorbed on graphene surface.

Authors:  Elizane E de Moraes; Mariana Z Tonel; Solange B Fagan; Marcia C Barbosa
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Influence of Single-Stranded DNA Coatings on the Interaction between Graphene Nanoflakes and Lipid Bilayers.

Authors:  Timothy C Moore; Alexander H Yang; Olu Ogungbesan; Remco Hartkamp; Christopher R Iacovella; Qi Zhang; Clare McCabe
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Aviram-Ratner rectifying mechanism for DNA base-pair sequencing through graphene nanogaps.

Authors:  Luis A Agapito; Jacob Gayles; Christian Wolowiec; Nicholas Kioussis
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.874

8.  Insight into the interaction between DNA bases and defective graphenes: covalent or non-covalent.

Authors:  Zhenfeng Xu; Biswa Ranjan Meher; Darnashley Eustache; Yixuan Wang
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.518

9.  Study of DNA base-Li doped SiC nanotubes in aqueous solutions: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Sepideh Ketabi; Seyed Majid Hashemianzadeh; Morteza Moghimiwaskasi
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 10.  Graphene nanodevices for DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Stephanie J Heerema; Cees Dekker
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 39.213

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.