Literature DB >> 18463857

Repetitive spinal motor neuron discharges following single transcranial magnetic stimulation: relation to dexterity.

W J Z'Graggen1, A M Humm, S Oppliger-Bachmann, M Hosang, K M Rösler.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation allows to study the properties of the human corticospinal tract non-invasively. After a single transcranial magnetic stimulus, spinal motor neurons (MNs) sometimes fire not just once, but repetitively. The biological significance of such repetitive MN discharges (repMNDs) is unknown. To study the relation of repMNDs to other measures of cortico-muscular excitability and to physiological measures of the skill for finely tuned precision movements, we used a previously described quadruple stimulation (QuadS) technique (Z'Graggen et al. 2005) to quantify the amount of repMNDs in abductor digiti minimi muscles (ADMs) on both sides of 20 right-handed healthy subjects. Skillfulness for finger precision movements of both hands was assessed using a finger tapping task. In 16 subjects, a follow-up examination was performed after training of either precision movements (n = 8) or force (n = 8) of the left ADM. The size of the QuadS response (amplitude and area ratios) was greater in the dominant right hand than in the left hand (QuadS amplitude ratio: 47.1 +/- 18.1 versus 37.7 +/- 22.0%, Wilcoxon test: P < 0.05; QuadS area ratio: 49.7 +/- 16.2% versus 36.9 +/- 23.0%, Wilcoxon test: P < 0.05), pointing to a greater amount of repMNDs. Moreover, the QuadS amplitude and area increased significantly after finger precision training, but not after force training. This increase of repMNDs correlated significantly with the increase in performance in the finger tapping task. Our results demonstrate that repMNDs are related to handedness and therefore probably reflect supraspinal excitability differences. The increase of repMNDs after skills training but not after force training supports the hypothesis of a supraspinal origin of repMNDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18463857     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1389-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; L Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Do F-wave measurements detect changes in motor neuron excitability?

Authors:  Jenny Z Lin; Mary Kay Floeter
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Nguyet; L G Cohen; J P Brasil-Neto; A Cammarota; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Task-dependent facilitation of motor evoked potentials during dynamic and steady muscle contractions.

Authors:  Z Arányi; J Mathis; C W Hess; K M Rösler
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice.

Authors:  J Classen; J Liepert; S P Wise; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effect of discharge desynchronization on the size of motor evoked potentials: an analysis.

Authors:  Kai M Rösler; Elisabeth Petrow; Johannes Mathis; Zsuzsanna Arányi; Christian W Hess; Michel R Magistris
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2. Multiple descending volleys.

Authors:  B L Day; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; J P Dick; J M Cowan; A Berardelli; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Sensitivity of cortical movement representations to motor experience: evidence that skill learning but not strength training induces cortical reorganization.

Authors:  M S Remple; R M Bruneau; P M VandenBerg; C Goertzen; J A Kleim
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Further evidence for corticomotor hyperexcitability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  D Naka; K R Mills
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  A clinical study of motor evoked potentials using a triple stimulation technique.

Authors:  M R Magistris; K M Rösler; A Truffert; T Landis; C W Hess
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  1 in total

1.  Desynchronization does not contribute to intracortical inhibition and facilitation: a paired-pulse paradigm study combined with TST.

Authors:  L Caranzano; M A Stephan; F R Herrmann; D H Benninger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.