Literature DB >> 12417220

Effect of discharge desynchronization on the size of motor evoked potentials: an analysis.

Kai M Rösler1, Elisabeth Petrow, Johannes Mathis, Zsuzsanna Arányi, Christian W Hess, Michel R Magistris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) are smaller than CMAPs after peripheral nerve stimulation, because desynchronization of the TMS-induced motor neurone discharges occurs (i.e. MEP desynchronization). This desynchronization effect can be eliminated by use of the triple stimulation technique (TST; Brain 121 (1998) 437). The objective of this paper is to study the effect of discharge desynchronization on MEPs by comparing the size of MEP and TST responses.
METHODS: MEP and TST responses were obtained in 10 healthy subjects during isometric contractions of the abductor digiti minimi, during voluntary background contractions between 0% and 20% of maximal force, and using 3 different stimulus intensities. Additional data from other normals and from multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were obtained from previous studies.
RESULTS: MEPs were smaller than TST responses in all subjects and under all stimulating conditions, confirming the marked influence of desynchronization on MEPs. There was a linear relation between the amplitudes of MEPs vs. TST responses, independent of the degree of voluntary contraction and stimulus intensity. The slope of the regression equation was 0.66 on average, indicating that desynchronization reduced the MEP amplitude on average by one third, with marked inter-individual variations. A similar average proportion was found in MS patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The MEP size reduction induced by desynchronization is not influenced by the intensity of TMS and by the level of facilitatory voluntary background contractions. It is similar in healthy subjects and in MS patients, in whom increased desynchronization of central conduction was previously suggested to occur. Thus, the MEP size reduction observed may not parallel the actual amount of desynchronization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12417220     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00263-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  16 in total

1.  Progressive suppression of intracortical inhibition during graded isometric contraction of a hand muscle is not influenced by hand preference.

Authors:  Maryam Zoghi; Michael A Nordstrom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Epoch length to accurately estimate the amplitude of interference EMG is likely the result of unavoidable amplitude cancellation.

Authors:  Kevin G Keenan; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.880

3.  Corticospinal output and loss of force during motor fatigue.

Authors:  Kai M Rösler; O Scheidegger; M R Magistris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Repetitive spinal motor neuron discharges following single transcranial magnetic stimulation: relation to dexterity.

Authors:  W J Z'Graggen; A M Humm; S Oppliger-Bachmann; M Hosang; K M Rösler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Both sleep and wakefulness support consolidation of continuous, goal-directed, visuomotor skill.

Authors:  Michael R Borich; Teresa Jacobson Kimberley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Desynchronization does not contribute to intracortical inhibition and facilitation: a paired-pulse paradigm study combined with TST.

Authors:  L Caranzano; M A Stephan; F R Herrmann; D H Benninger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The effect of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation on complexity of EMG signal: fractal analysis.

Authors:  M Cukic; J Oommen; D Mutavdzic; N Jorgovanovic; M Ljubisavljevic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Placebo-induced changes in excitatory and inhibitory corticospinal circuits during motor performance.

Authors:  Mirta Fiorio; Mehran Emadi Andani; Angela Marotta; Joseph Classen; Michele Tinazzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Demand on skillfulness modulates interhemispheric inhibition of motor cortices.

Authors:  Miles Wischnewski; Greg M Kowalski; Farrah Rink; Samir R Belagaje; Marc W Haut; Gerald Hobbs; Cathrin M Buetefisch
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Quantification of central motor conduction deficits in multiple sclerosis patients before and after treatment of acute exacerbation by methylprednisolone.

Authors:  A M Humm; W J Z'Graggen; R Bühler; M R Magistris; K M Rösler
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.