Literature DB >> 18462714

Indoor air particles and bioaerosols before and after renovation of moisture-damaged buildings: the effect on biological activity and microbial flora.

Kati Huttunen1, Helena Rintala, Maija-Riitta Hirvonen, Asko Vepsäläinen, Anne Hyvärinen, Teija Meklin, Mika Toivola, Aino Nevalainen.   

Abstract

Many building-related health problems coincide with moisture damage and mold growth within a building. Their elimination is assumed to improve indoor air quality. The aim of this study was to follow the success of remediation in two individual buildings by analyzing the microbial flora and immunotoxicological activity of filter samples. We compare results from samples collected from indoor air in the moisture-damaged buildings before and after renovation and results from matched reference buildings and outdoor air. The microbial characteristics of the samples were studied by analyzing ergosterol content and determining the composition of fungal flora with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR). In addition, the concentrations of particles were monitored with optical particle counter (OPC). The immunotoxicological activity of collected particle samples was tested by exposing mouse macrophages (RAW264.7) for 24 h to particle suspension extracted from the filters, and measuring the viability of the exposed cells (MTT-test) and production of inflammatory mediators (nitric oxide, IL-6 and TNF*) in cell culture medium by enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). The results show that for Location 1 the renovation decreased the immunotoxicological activity of the particles collected from damaged building, whereas no difference was detected in the corresponding samples collected from the reference building. Interestingly, only slight differences were seen in the concentration of fungi. In the Location 2, a decrease was seen in the concentration of fungi after the renovation, whereas no effect on the immunotoxicological responses was detected. In this case, the immunotoxicological responses to the indoor air samples were almost identical to those caused by the samples from outdoor air. This indicates that the effects of remediation on the indoor air quality may not necessarily be readily measurable either with microbial or toxicological parameters. This may be associated with different spectrum of harmful agents in different mold and moisture-damaged buildings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18462714     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of microbiological indoor air quality in an Italian office building equipped with an HVAC system.

Authors:  Sa Bonetta; Si Bonetta; S Mosso; S Sampò; E Carraro
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Microbiological quality of indoor air in university libraries.

Authors:  Samuel Fekadu Hayleeyesus; Abayneh Melaku Manaye
Journal:  Asian Pac J Trop Biomed       Date:  2014-05

3.  Evaluation of sampling methods for toxicological testing of indoor air particulate matter.

Authors:  Jenni Tirkkonen; Martin Täubel; Maija-Riitta Hirvonen; Hanna Leppänen; William G Lindsley; Bean T Chen; Anne Hyvärinen; Kati Huttunen
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  Studying the microbiology of the indoor environment.

Authors:  Scott T Kelley; Jack A Gilbert
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  Molecular profiling of fungal communities in moisture damaged buildings before and after remediation--a comparison of culture-dependent and culture-independent methods.

Authors:  Miia Pitkäranta; Teija Meklin; Anne Hyvärinen; Aino Nevalainen; Lars Paulin; Petri Auvinen; Ulla Lignell; Helena Rintala
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Dispersal in microbes: fungi in indoor air are dominated by outdoor air and show dispersal limitation at short distances.

Authors:  Rachel I Adams; Marzia Miletto; John W Taylor; Thomas D Bruns
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 10.302

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.