Literature DB >> 18461266

Validation of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey upper extremity functional status module in people with unilateral upper limb amputation.

Helena Burger1, Franco Franchignoni, Allen W Heinemann, Stanislava Kotnik, Andrea Giordano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the measurement properties of the Upper Extremity Functional Status module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics User Survey (OPUS).
DESIGN: Methodological research on an outcome measure administered by clinical interview. PATIENTS: A convenience sample of 61 adults who had unilateral upper limb amputations and completed rehabilitation at the Institute for Rehabilitation in Ljubljana, Slovenia, at least one year prior to interview. Thirty-four patients had undergone amputation of the dominant hand. Four patients did not use a prosthesis.
METHODS: Rating scale analysis (Rasch model) was used to evaluate functioning of the rating scale categories, the validity of the measure by examining fit of items to the latent trait, and the hierarchy of item difficulties compared with expectations of the construct.
RESULTS: Rasch analysis allowed us to improve the Upper Extremity Functional Status by rescoring to reduce the response categories from 5 to 4, and identifying 19 of 23 items that are useful to measure upper extremity function. The results allow us to have high confidence in the consistency of both person-ability and item-difficulty estimates.
CONCLUSION: This revised Upper Extremity Functional Status is a promising instrument to measure the degree of manual functioning after a unilateral upper limb amputation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18461266     DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  9 in total

Review 1.  How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: Review of NIDILRR's Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Sarah Blackstone; Cathy Bodine; John Brabyn; David Brienza; Kevin Caves; Frank DeRuyter; Edmund Durfee; Stefania Fatone; Geoff Fernie; Steven Gard; Patricia Karg; Todd A Kuiken; Gerald F Harris; Mike Jones; Yue Li; Jordana Maisel; Michael McCue; Michelle A Meade; Helena Mitchell; Tracy L Mitzner; James L Patton; Philip S Requejo; James H Rimmer; Wendy A Rogers; W Zev Rymer; Jon A Sanford; Lawrence Schneider; Levin Sliker; Stephen Sprigle; Aaron Steinfeld; Edward Steinfeld; Gregg Vanderheiden; Carolee Winstein; Li-Qun Zhang; Thomas Corfman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 2.  Neuroprosthetics and the science of patient input.

Authors:  Heather L Benz; Eugene F Civillico
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Improves Residual Limb Pain, Phantom Limb Pain, and Limb Function: A Prospective Study of 33 Major Limb Amputees.

Authors:  Lauren M Mioton; Gregory A Dumanian; Nikita Shah; Cecil S Qiu; William J Ertl; Benjamin K Potter; Jason M Souza; Ian L Valerio; Jason H Ko; Sumanas W Jordan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Flexible and static wrist units in upper limb prosthesis users: functionality scores, user satisfaction and compensatory movements.

Authors:  M Deijs; R M Bongers; N D M Ringeling-van Leusen; C K van der Sluis
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Use of the DEKA Arm for amputees with brachial plexus injury: A case series.

Authors:  Linda Resnik; Christopher Fantini; Gail Latlief; Samuel Phillips; Nicole Sasson; Eve Sepulveda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A practical 3D-printed soft robotic prosthetic hand with multi-articulating capabilities.

Authors:  Alireza Mohammadi; Jim Lavranos; Hao Zhou; Rahim Mutlu; Gursel Alici; Ying Tan; Peter Choong; Denny Oetomo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Upper-Limb Prosthetic Myocontrol: Two Recommendations.

Authors:  Claudio Castellini; Raoul M Bongers; Markus Nowak; Corry K van der Sluis
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  How do the outcomes of the DEKA Arm compare to conventional prostheses?

Authors:  Linda J Resnik; Matthew L Borgia; Frantzy Acluche; Jill M Cancio; Gail Latlief; Nicole Sasson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of EMG pattern recognition for upper limb prosthesis control: a case study in comparison with direct myoelectric control.

Authors:  Linda Resnik; He Helen Huang; Anna Winslow; Dustin L Crouch; Fan Zhang; Nancy Wolk
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.262

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.