Lauren M Mioton1, Gregory A Dumanian1, Nikita Shah1, Cecil S Qiu1, William J Ertl2, Benjamin K Potter3, Jason M Souza3, Ian L Valerio4, Jason H Ko1, Sumanas W Jordan1. 1. L. M. Mioton, G. A. Dumanian, N. Shah, C. S. Qiu, J. H. Ko, S. W. Jordan, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. W. J. Ertl, The Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. 3. B. K. Potter, J. M. Souza, Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. I. L. Valerio, The Department of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation is an emerging surgical technique to treat neuroma pain whereby sensory and mixed motor nerves are transferred to nearby redundant motor nerve branches. In a recent randomized controlled trial, targeted muscle reinnervation was recently shown to reduce postamputation pain relative to conventional neuroma excision and muscle burying. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does targeted muscle reinnervation improve residual limb pain and phantom limb pain in the period before surgery to 1 year after surgery? (2) Does targeted muscle reinnervation improve Patient-reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) pain intensity and pain interference scores at 1 year after surgery? (3) After 1 year, does targeted muscle reinnervation improve functional outcome scores (Orthotics Prosthetics User Survey [OPUS] with Rasch conversion and Neuro-Quality of Life [Neuro-QOL])? METHODS: Data on patients who were ineligible for randomization or declined to be randomized and underwent targeted muscle reinnervation for pain were gathered for the present analysis. Data were collected prospectively from 2013 to 2017. Forty-three patients were enrolled in the study, 10 of whom lacked 1-year follow-up, leaving 33 patients for analysis. The primary outcomes measured were the difference in residual limb and phantom limb pain before and 1 year after surgery, assessed by an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were change in PROMIS pain measures and change in limb function, assessed by the OPUS Rasch for upper limbs and Neuro-QOL for lower limbs before and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: By 1 year after targeted muscle reinnervation, NRS scores for residual limb pain from 6.4 ± 2.6 to 3.6 ± 2.2 (mean difference -2.7 [95% CI -4.2 to -1.3]; p < 0.001) and phantom limb pain decreased from 6.0 ± 3.1 to 3.6 ± 2.9 (mean difference -2.4 [95% CI -3.8 to -0.9]; p < 0.001). PROMIS pain intensity and pain interference scores improved with respect to residual limb and phantom limb pain (residual limb pain intensity: 53.4 ± 9.7 to 44.4 ± 7.9, mean difference -9.0 [95% CI -14.0 to -4.0]; residual limb pain interference: 60.4 ± 9.3 to 51.7 ± 8.2, mean difference -8.7 [95% CI -13.1 to -4.4]; phantom limb pain intensity: 49.3 ± 10.4 to 43.2 ± 9.3, mean difference -6.1 [95% CI -11.3 to -0.9]; phantom limb pain interference: 57.7 ± 10.4 to 50.8 ± 9.8, mean difference -6.9 [95% CI -12.1 to -1.7]; p ≤ 0.012 for all comparisons). On functional assessment, OPUS Rasch scores improved from 53.7 ± 3.4 to 56.4 ± 3.7 (mean difference +2.7 [95% CI 2.3 to 3.2]; p < 0.001) and Neuro-QOL scores improved from 32.9 ± 1.5 to 35.2 ± 1.6 (mean difference +2.3 [95% CI 1.8 to 2.9]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted muscle reinnervation demonstrates improvement in residual limb and phantom limb pain parameters in major limb amputees. It should be considered as a first-line surgical treatment option for chronic amputation-related pain in patients with major limb amputations. Additional investigation into the effect on function and quality of life should be performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.
BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation is an emerging surgical technique to treat neuroma pain whereby sensory and mixed motor nerves are transferred to nearby redundant motor nerve branches. In a recent randomized controlled trial, targeted muscle reinnervation was recently shown to reduce postamputation pain relative to conventional neuroma excision and muscle burying. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does targeted muscle reinnervation improve residual limb pain and phantom limb pain in the period before surgery to 1 year after surgery? (2) Does targeted muscle reinnervation improve Patient-reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) pain intensity and pain interference scores at 1 year after surgery? (3) After 1 year, does targeted muscle reinnervation improve functional outcome scores (Orthotics Prosthetics User Survey [OPUS] with Rasch conversion and Neuro-Quality of Life [Neuro-QOL])? METHODS: Data on patients who were ineligible for randomization or declined to be randomized and underwent targeted muscle reinnervation for pain were gathered for the present analysis. Data were collected prospectively from 2013 to 2017. Forty-three patients were enrolled in the study, 10 of whom lacked 1-year follow-up, leaving 33 patients for analysis. The primary outcomes measured were the difference in residual limb and phantom limb pain before and 1 year after surgery, assessed by an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were change in PROMIS pain measures and change in limb function, assessed by the OPUS Rasch for upper limbs and Neuro-QOL for lower limbs before and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: By 1 year after targeted muscle reinnervation, NRS scores for residual limb pain from 6.4 ± 2.6 to 3.6 ± 2.2 (mean difference -2.7 [95% CI -4.2 to -1.3]; p < 0.001) and phantom limb pain decreased from 6.0 ± 3.1 to 3.6 ± 2.9 (mean difference -2.4 [95% CI -3.8 to -0.9]; p < 0.001). PROMIS pain intensity and pain interference scores improved with respect to residual limb and phantom limb pain (residual limb pain intensity: 53.4 ± 9.7 to 44.4 ± 7.9, mean difference -9.0 [95% CI -14.0 to -4.0]; residual limb pain interference: 60.4 ± 9.3 to 51.7 ± 8.2, mean difference -8.7 [95% CI -13.1 to -4.4]; phantom limb pain intensity: 49.3 ± 10.4 to 43.2 ± 9.3, mean difference -6.1 [95% CI -11.3 to -0.9]; phantom limb pain interference: 57.7 ± 10.4 to 50.8 ± 9.8, mean difference -6.9 [95% CI -12.1 to -1.7]; p ≤ 0.012 for all comparisons). On functional assessment, OPUS Rasch scores improved from 53.7 ± 3.4 to 56.4 ± 3.7 (mean difference +2.7 [95% CI 2.3 to 3.2]; p < 0.001) and Neuro-QOL scores improved from 32.9 ± 1.5 to 35.2 ± 1.6 (mean difference +2.3 [95% CI 1.8 to 2.9]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted muscle reinnervation demonstrates improvement in residual limb and phantom limb pain parameters in major limb amputees. It should be considered as a first-line surgical treatment option for chronic amputation-related pain in patients with major limb amputations. Additional investigation into the effect on function and quality of life should be performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.
Authors: Laura A Miller; Kathy A Stubblefield; Robert D Lipschutz; Blair A Lock; Todd A Kuiken Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Patti L Ephraim; Stephen T Wegener; Ellen J MacKenzie; Timothy R Dillingham; Liliana E Pezzin Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Taylor E Purvis; Elena Andreou; Brian J Neuman; Lee H Riley; Richard L Skolasky Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: D M Ehde; J M Czerniecki; D G Smith; K M Campbell; W T Edwards; M P Jensen; L R Robinson Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Gregory A Dumanian; Benjamin K Potter; Lauren M Mioton; Jason H Ko; Jennifer E Cheesborough; Jason M Souza; William J Ertl; Scott M Tintle; George P Nanos; Ian L Valerio; Todd A Kuiken; A Vania Apkarian; Kyle Porter; Sumanas W Jordan Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Denis Ehrl; Nikolaus Wachtel; David Braig; Constanze Kuhlmann; Hans Roland Dürr; Christian P Schneider; Riccardo E Giunta Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Sonu A Jain; Jason Nydick; Fraser Leversedge; Dominic Power; Joseph Styron; Bauback Safa; Gregory Buncke Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-10-04
Authors: Matthias Luft; Johanna Klepetko; Silvia Muceli; Jaime Ibáñez; Vlad Tereshenko; Christopher Festin; Gregor Laengle; Olga Politikou; Udo Maierhofer; Dario Farina; Oskar C Aszmann; Konstantin Davide Bergmeister Journal: Elife Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: John M Felder; Stahs Pripotnev; Ivica Ducic; Rachel Skladman; Austin Y Ha; Mitchell A Pet Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-04-06